VeryGood

Kamala Harris: 67/79 = 84.81% Gavin Newsom: 6/79 = 7.59% Pete Buttigieg: 5/79 = 6.33% Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: 1/79 = 1.27%

it would be nice if everyone in michigan could keep their shit together for 3 godforsaken days. people can't keep their mouths shut and lock tf in for 70 hours? save the long 2016 slap fighting for the month of silence we have before the presidential cycle starts up publicly. please.

Resist lib slop moms are mad, but what is impeaching him going to do exactly? We can’t remove him.

We have a chance to smother the last half of the Trump Presidency in the cradle. I don’t know why we’re not all hands on deck.

👀

Hunter lives in Malibu I believe.

We are we still relitigating the Michigan Senate Primary? The election is in 4 goddamned days.

Yes, that’s what they seem to be. At least some are using them that way. But California isn’t in the equation for her, and none of that contingent that keeps pointing that out has seemed to internalize that.

You mean Alaskans don’t care about a “scandal” that the Republicans pulled the pin on months ago? Shocked, I tell ya’

Stuff like this isn’t interesting. It’s the H2H measurements between Harris and Newsom that are interesting.

Oh, oh. I see it.

This is wordy, but: It's so perplexing. But people like Peter are probably confusing Newsom's willingness to defer to her as evidence that he expects her to decline. It could be that he doesn't know, and is preparing to go if she does stay out. In fact, Newsom's conduct is entirely consistent with someone believes that there is a huge chance that Harris ultimately runs and that challenging her isn't worth the consequences. Because suppose that crowd is right, and Newsom genuinely believes Harris sits out. What does he gain by this? If she doesn't run, his path is clear. If she runs, he's disqualified himself, unless he's willing to break his word. And if he does that, he's handed Harris a bludgeon that she can use to smash his credibility and political conviction. Because, I promise you, if Newsom does run against Harris, and she does fail, her supporters won't flock to him. We, as Harris supporters, by and large, remember. 😆 And he's gone on the record five times, each time more firmly than before making this commitment, without getting anything from her in return. She hasn't endorsed it, or commented, and only, allegedly, subliminally, took a swipe at him through sources. He's given basically everything, she's still holding all of her cards. I'm not sure that framing Harris as being in the weaker position is the thing to do here.

Getting close to locking this in. We'll see what Monday brings.

I want a straight up attack dog. Harris can be the joyful warrior, and whoever the VP pick is can go around calling Vance and whatever unfortunate denizen of the Island of Misfit Toys he picks to be his running mate shriveled little homunculi of American conservatism, and emphasizing that small children should throw dirt at them as they pass by.