Roses are red, your hair is blue, women are female and biology is true.
Joined March 2025
- Tweets5.5K
- Following672
- Followers297
- Likes10.9K
Pinned Tweet
Hi! Meet Cameron âNatalieâ Pershall. Cameron changed his name to Natalie, started female hormones and got his sex changed on legal documents. âNatalieâ did not get any genital surgery though. âNatalieâ used his new identity to take photos of hundreds of women in restrooms. He got away with it until a female co-worker caught him taking her photo while she was urinating.
âNatalieâ denied it and said he just dropped his phone. He went home and wiped his phone and hard drive on his computer. The co-worker pressed charges and investigators were able to recover the data he deleted and found hundreds of photos of women on toilets. Apparently, âNatalieâ has a pee fetish. Unfortunately, most of the women found on his phone were not able to be identified. So they have no idea this even happened to them.
Keep in mind, âNatalieâ was able to get away with this for a long time until he got caught. How many âNataliesâ are out there getting away with it every day? How many women are being recorded without their knowledge or consent? We have no idea because most video voyeurs are never caught. But we do know that 95-99% of those who are caught are male.
Women are not collateral damage for men with fetishes. Stop spreading this false idea that we arenât more at risk when males are allowed in our private spaces.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
Classification isn't discrimination, y'all.
It's discernment.
You can't protect women if you can't say what one is.
You can't protect kids if "child" is up for a vote.
Definitions aren't supposed to be inclusive, honey. They're supposed to draw a line so we all know what we're talking about. That's literally their whole job.
Blurring that line isn't progress.
It's erasure.
Women aren't a costume.
We aren't a feeling.
We aren't a vibe.
We're a SEX.
And that's not up for a vote either.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
Iâve never told any trans person what they âshould be.â As far as Iâm concerned, trans people can call themselves whatever they like and believe whatever they like about themselves. What trans people arenât entitled to is universal agreement that theyâve changed sex, acclaim for their embodiment of sex stereotypes, the reconfiguration of laws around an objective untruth or womenâs surrender of their sex-based rights.
This is what ALL female athletes are going to have to do until sex-based fairness is restored in female sports.
BREAKING: Nearly half of the girls cross-country team in Camas, Washington, just forfeited their race. They refused to compete against a boy. This is bravery. Vote YES on I-638 to stand with them. Video: @KnownHeretic
Many modern feminists reallyâŠ.arenât.
They are misandrists.
âBelieve all womenâ isnât fair.
Assuming men should have more responsibility when drunk isnât equality.
Women are more physically vulnerable, yes, but we arenât mentally inferior.
We have agency.
I am NOT Jane Doe.
If Jane Doe had never claimed she was gang raped and instead she just enjoyed a âliberatingâ night of drugs, alcohol, and hedonistic group sex (like many college students)âŠ.if the men had tried to âshelter and protectâ her, it would have been considered sexist âslut shamingâ.
Itâs not fair that the #Cornell7 are being labeled rapists without due process. Accusations arenât always true. Yet they are having their photos/names plastered everywhere and their lives ruined. All parties should be anonymous until the process is complete. All deserve fairness.
And if a man consents to a threesome (or foursome) it doesnât make him a rapist. Women are allowed to say no just like men. We donât have to say âsure!â to every sexual request. If someone loses their inhibitions because of drugs or alcohol, that doesnât mean it was rape.
This quoted post is unavailable.
âBabeâ (degrading to women) you seem to think men are smarter and therefore should be the more responsible parties when everyone is inebriated. You can infantilize yourself if you like (itâs deserved) but donât include me. Iâm not a gullible fool like you.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
You know most folks who have been gang raped for 7 hours totally try to hook up for more sex the very next day.
This explains what @JaneDoe claimed in 2024, 3 weeks after it occurred. She has completely changed her story 2 years later. If her first account is true, itâs an absolute shame that these men have been publicly crucified as ârapistsâ. This describes a consensual drunken orgy.
Let me go ahead and take one final stab at explaining what happened at Cornell because with all the numbers it can get confusing
Hereâs all the men and their role in this:
- male number 1 is the guy she was into who she went to see after choosing to pregame and get drunk. They met up at his frat house. After the whole encounter she texted him trying to make plans to hook up again but just the two of them this time. Thereâs no way to assume anything other than consent here. He was in the first and third threesome
- male number 2 is the guy 1 proposed having a threesome with after she arrived. She told the police this idea excited her because she thought they might both be gay for eachother. She agreed enthusiastically. Her claimed intoxication level at this point is a few beers. We have to reasonably assume consent here especially given NYâs laws on this. He was in the first and second threesome
- male number 3 is whoâs room that 80% of the story went down in. He participated in the second threesome with male number 2 in his room, after 1 passed out. He asked to come into the room and she agreed because it was his room. She was on some ketamine at this point but agreed to it. Second threesome consensual
- male number 4 is who you can make the best case committed rape. Not a good case, just better than the rest against whom you cannot make a case. At some point one of them texted the Snapchat âfree pussyâ and four guys came in, 4, 5, 6, 7. She hid under the covers because she became uncomfortable. When they came in 2 offered her more ketamine and she agreed because sheâd already done it earlier so âwhy notâ. She did the ketamine off 2âs erect dick in front of all of them. 4 suggested she let everyone do ketamine off her naked body. She said âsureâ. After all this insanity, at some point 3 tried to kick everyone out his room. 5 or 6 (they have the same first name so itâs unclear which she meant) told her she can sit down as long as she needed to because she got dizzy from her medical condition and the ketamine but eventually 3 kicked them out and got his room back. 4 then went upstairs with 1 and her and they had the third threesome. She canât remember how that happened. She doesnât claim she was unconscious. She doesnât claim she said no. She canât remember.
- Male number 5 and 6 were literally just in the room from when they got the snap to when they all got kicked out by 3. Itâs unclear if they did drugs off her body but she consented to everyone doing it so it wouldnât matter. Nothing else happened
- Male number 7 tried to kiss her and said some rude things to her as soon as he walked into the room after the snap went out. She immediately shut it down. He never had sex with her. She didnât want to have sex with him and even at this stage of intoxication was able to indicate she wasnât interested and it was respected.
Hereâs all the threesomes and their context:
First: 1 & 2, the least debatable and most defensible. She wanted it and said so and joked and chose it. 1 eventually passes out from drinking too much
Second: 2 & 3 after 1 passes out, she fools around with 2 for a bit before 3 comes into his room and she lets him join and itâs all consensual. 1 wakes up part way through and asks to join and make it a foursome. She says âhell noâ because she knew that meant anal and she didnât want anal. So 1 didnât join and no one had anal with her. Her boundary was stated and respected.
Third: after everyone is kicked out of 3s room, 1 & 4 go into another room with her. She chooses this and still wants 1 alone, 1 on 1. But 4 is there for some reason too. She has no memory of what happened, but they had the threesome. The day after she texts 1 again trying to hook up alone with him so we can assume she consented with 1. 4 is a question mark but she doesnât remember enough to say she didnât consent because the ketamine she took voluntarily scrambled her memory
nytimes.com/interactive/2026âŠ
Jane Doe @Cornell wasnât unconscious. She went to the frat house already drunk and said yes to a threesome. She said âsure!â to ketamine and snorted it off their dicks and let them snort it off her body. Read her original statement in 2024. ALL need to be heard before judgement.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
I donât care what anyone says,
Sydney Sweeney didnât set women back decades.
OnlyFans did.
Men competing in womenâs sports did.
Lindsay Clancyâs defenders did.
âSex work is workâ did.
Dylan Mulvaney did.
DEI did.
Calling women âbirthing peopleâ did.
The total mainstreaming of porn did.
Treating stay-at-home moms like they wasted their lives did.
A beautiful actress isnât the problem.
A culture that stopped protecting women is.
Tell me Iâm wrong. đ€·ââïž
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
If he will do this on a public sidewalk imagine the horror this poor little girl goes through behind closed doors. Why is he still breathing.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
As another man who once worked with me declares himself saddened by my beliefs on gender and sex, I thought it might be useful to compile a list for handy reference. Which of the following do you imagine makes actors and directors who arenât involved with the HBO reboot of Harry Potter so miserable?
Is it my belief that women and girls should have their own public changing rooms and bathrooms?
That women should retain female-only rape crisis centres?
That men donât belong in womenâs sport?
That female prisoners shouldnât be incarcerated with violent men and male sex offenders?
That women should remain a protected class in law, because they have sex-specific needs and issues?
That language should reflect reality rather than ideological jargon, especially in a medical context?
That women shouldnât be harassed, persecuted or fired for refusing to pretend humans can change sex?
That women should not be threatened with violence and rape when they assert their rights?
That freedom of speech and belief are essential to a pluralistic democratic society?
That troubled minors, especially those who are gay, autistic and trauma-experienced, should be given mental health support instead of irreversible surgeries and drug treatments on non-existent evidence of benefit?
That gay people shouldnât be pressured to include the opposite sex in their dating pools, nor should they be smeared as âgenital fetishistsâ when they donât?
That cross-dressing heterosexual male fetishists arenât actually oppressed, but having the time of their lives piggybacking off gender identity ideology?
That said ideology, and the privileged, blinkered fools pushing it because they suffer zero consequences themselves, have done more damage to the political leftâs credibility than Trump and Farage could have achieved in a century?
Let me have your thoughts.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
This actually makes me feel sad. Society made this woman feel like she had to pretend to be a man to be happy. Her tiny stature, the way she walks, her mannerisms, everything about her screams female. The oversized suit just makes her look like a child playing dress up.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
Itâs not a âconservative campaignâ when 79% of the country does not support males competing in female sports. The number is probably even higher because many on the left wonât admit it due to fear of being ostracized. This is about fairness and privacy for women and girls.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
Becky can still play. Becky just needs to play on the male team. Being in denial doesnât change biology.
Cee D. McHughes𫧠retweeted
Today you will read many sympathetic media stories about B.P.J., the male athlete who challenged WVâs law and lost at SCOTUS.
Iâm guessing none will mention that B.P.J. defeated 470+ girls 1,400+ times (including a state title) and sexually harassed our client Adaleia (pictured) in the girlsâ locker room. Sadly, Adaleia stopped playing the school sports she loved due to B.P.J.âs ongoing presence in girlsâ sports and spaces.
But weâll probably be lucky if those girls get even a passing mentionâlet alone a front-page photo.
This has been the pattern on this issue from far too many institutions of power. Boysâ feelings are the focus. Girlsâ safety, fairness, and opportunity take a back seat.âš
Iâm so thankful today that the Supreme Court reversed that pattern, acknowledged the reality of biological sex, and remembered the girls.
