Amazed by nature and wildlife. I enjoy taking photos as a hobby. Also amazed by cats. 🐱 All photographs my own. 📸😊 ‘You do yours, I’ll do mine.’
Joined December 2020
- Tweets3.2K
- Following2.5K
- Followers1.5K
- Likes35.8K
Pinned Tweet
I think this little owl might have known it was my birthday as he didn’t look quite so cross as usual. 😠😆 🎈🦉 He melts my heart. What a cutie sitting there in the rain. ☔️ 🌧
@Britnatureguide @Natures_Voice @durhamwildlife @Steveredwolf @jane__eden #NaturePhotography #owls
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
I am going to describe some painful and personal things in relation to Russell Brand because I have been put in a position now where I feel that I have no choice other than to do so, given the misleading reports and speculation around the facts of a harassment injunction that was taken out to protect me and my family.
Firstly, and most importantly, I am and have always been strongly and unequivocally on the side of all of Brand’s victims. I am in awe of the courageous women who came forward at Brand’s trial, told their stories, testified and ensured justice was done. I have had my own personal experience of his violence, coercive control and abuse. I had to call the police to have him removed from my house in 2014 during a violent incident. I chose not to press charges at the time and not to go public with this, as I was worried about the impact of the press attention on my then teenage children. I have neither seen nor spoken to Brand since that period in 2014. Whilst my pain in relation to this, pales in comparison to what the women have testified in court have suffered, this was a difficult period in my life which has had a lasting impact.
Over several years, I assisted the journalists who finally exposed him; Ros Urwin, Louisa Compton and Dorothy Byrne. I also undertook to testify in court to his abusiveness, if the newspaper that published the victims’ accounts were ever to be sued.
I have spent much of my professional career trying to support unfairly demonised and silenced women, such as Monica Lewinsky and defending free speech.
In 2014, a harassment injunction was taken out against a woman called Szilvia Berki which was made final in 2015.
I fully understand the good intentions of those now advocating on her behalf online and agree with their demand for this harassment injunction to be varied, as my lawyer made clear to Berki’s lawyer in December last year.
However, the commentary and media reporting this week has presented an untrue narrative, which has opened me up to vile hatred and abuse online.
For this reason, and to correct the record, I am providing the factual background to that injunction to explain why The High Court found the campaign of harassment by Berki against me to be, "oppressive and unacceptable” and made the order permanent.
The background to this is that Ms Berki came to my house for roughly 30 minutes in June 2014, after I booked her to give a massage to Brand. By the time she arrived he had decided he didn’t want a massage and asked her to leave. She was clearly offended. I was present the whole time he was with her, and I did not see anything untoward, despite the fact that he was later found guilty of sexually assaulting other women and he later physically assaulted me. If I saw any man abuse any woman under any circumstances, I would do my utmost to stop them, without hesitation.
Ms Berki later reported to the police that Brand had pushed her in the back whilst she was leaving the house and that she also said she was “attacked” by my dog, which she described in her police statement as my dog licking her face. The police rightly investigated Ms Berki’s complaint. I cooperated fully with the investigation, provided a truthful statement about what I saw and also provided CCTV footage, which showed my overly exuberant but totally unaggressive dog jumping up.
Following an investigation into Ms Berki’s allegations, police concluded that there was no case to answer and that no criminal offence had been committed.
According to the police, at no time did Ms Berki ever state to them that she had been assaulted, threatened or falsely imprisoned.
There was also a subsequent review of the investigation by the IPCC and Thames Valley Police Professional Standards which found that the original police investigation had been correct in its findings.
In the meantime, several untrue stories appeared in the tabloid papers. Ms Berki forwarded an email to me confirming a payment for one such story she had received from The Sun newspaper. Articles were also published in The Telegraph, The Mail and The Mirror at Ms Berki’s instigation which contained her account of the alleged incident.
Then having at first said in a story published by the Daily Mail that she had found me to be “really very nice, very, very nice,” she later embarked on a campaign of vicious antisemitic and threatening abuse online and in emails.
Below is just a sample of some of those tweets and messages sent over many months (which were submitted to the judge who granted the harassment injunction)-
(Jemima is a) “deeply rotted JEWISH Bitch”
“Did you know that if your life is in danger you can LAWFULLY kill your attacker as defence?! … by now I could have lawfully kill at least 5-6 people who were hurting me”
“Also happy birthday (Jemima). I hope you have more. In other words I hope you don’t die this year.”
EMAIL- “If you make me very upset…you can expect the worts from me – I think you know this – without that I need to remind you”
“What is going on in Britain is a dictatory of J evils. English Jewish Evil dictatory”
“Would like to see justice, and I do not think that I should do it myself but what can I do when every organisation is scared of Jevils! ;)”
“They say … Do not hate all Jews because you know a few Jewish evils. They are on top always decadent and evils”
“Fortunately there are many mansions outside of the UK where Jewish money aristocrats are still not welcomed
#Germany #Austria #Italy #Hungary”
"Judge on High Court: I ordered her to shut up Jew. Do I have a case or not? soon we will kill her then".
“A pity that I was in the UK. BB In Hungary if you would report the Police they would for sure find it without an investigation already that the Jews are guilty. Sad”
“Every organisation is scared of JEVILS”
“When my great grandparents see what Jews did to me they do something in heaven to solve this. I will not make my hand dirty with Jews.”
“J evils … Rob, lie, crime”
“I am so happy I am free from the English Jewish Evil dictator and outside of England the High Court cannot rule”
“Probably I wait a bit more and than go public. What is going on in Britain is a dictatory of J evils.”
She sent an enormous volume of similarly disturbing emails and tweets to or about me, to my family, to my workplace, to journalists from the national media to members of my family, to UNICEF UK where I had been a goodwill Ambassador for decades, and to organisations my ex-husband was associated with, and to MPs.
She began disseminating on social media wild and untrue allegations about me, ranging from kidnap to cyberhacking, to having someone bump into her and laugh at her in the tube station, having her followed by two men, bribing the police, paying off a judge, and other false and alarming conspiracy theories based on my Jewishness.
The number, tone and content of these messages was extremely frightening. It was distressing for my then teenage children and my family. I was concerned that Ms Berki was potentially a real danger to my family and me. I have had stalkers before and this behaviour felt similarly threatening.
Although I was at this point no longer in contact with Brand, I agreed to the suggestion by his lawyer of a harassment order. My sole reason was to stop Ms Berki targeting me and my family. The harassment injunction was upheld by the High Court and Court of Appeal on several occasions.
I engaged a lawyer of my own when I was made aware that Berki was applying to the court to vary the terms of the injunction. And I instructed my lawyer in December last year to approach Ms Berki’s barrister to say that I agreed to vary the injunction so that she could speak to the police again if she wanted to. I also instructed my lawyer to engage on her other requests.
I did this despite my real fears that the harassment would re-commence and that her threatening antisemitism, if again unleashed, might exacerbate the danger to my children and me that we continue to face because of our Jewish heritage and their father’s political career and incarceration in Pakistan.
Her barrister has not responded to my lawyer since May of this year despite trying to engage him. I was informed by her lawyer that any change to the injunction must also be agreed by Brand. I have no ability to compel Brand in this matter, as I have not seen or spoken to him in over a decade.
I hope this information will help clarify speculation about my involvement in the anti-harassment order.
I am glad and relieved that Russell Brand has finally faced justice.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
I’m sorry, but I feel like I need to make this post. Both my parents suffered sexual abuse.
My mother was abused by her stepfather. My father was raped as a child in a care home for orphans.
I have a friend who was raped repeatedly by her father telling her how much he loved her and that she reminded him of her dead mother, and another friend raped by her very own uncle.
So watching people on 𝕏 defend a convicted rapist and blame the women who came forward genuinely disgusts me. It also makes me question whether they understand the meaning of consent.
This isn’t a joke to me. It disgusts me.
Before claiming Russell Brand was “set up by the system”, perhaps take five minutes to research the evidence that convicted him.
In 2009, Brand met a 21-year-old woman at a comedy show. She subsequently went to his home.
Their sexual encounter initially began consensually. But consent to one act is NOT consent to another.
She described being subjected to anal rape, leaving her with physical and psychological injuries.
She disclosed what happened shortly afterwards. The jury heard evidence from people she told at the time, including family and friends. Medical records and a nurse’s statement also supported her account of seeking medical attention and reporting what happened.
This wasn’t simply an allegation invented 17 years later.
And the investigation went considerably further.
According to the Metropolitan Police:
• Over 100 witnesses traced and interviewed.
• More than 400 witness statements taken.
• Over 1,400 documents reviewed.
• Historical photographs, floor plans and timelines examined.
• Hundreds of hours of Brand’s interviews, television appearances and performances reviewed.
Police also reported that Brand initially claimed not to recognise the women involved, before his account changed as the case approached trial.
These figures cover the entire investigation, not just the rape conviction.
The jury also heard evidence concerning three other women.
Brand was convicted of sexually assaulting an MTV worker, a Choice FM employee and a Channel 4 worker.
The jury also ACQUITTED him of three other charges.
Think about that before claiming the jury simply convicted him because he was famous or unpopular.
They considered separate allegations and returned different verdicts.
Brand himself admitted in court to using his fame to facilitate sexual access, while maintaining that his encounters were consensual.
But being famous, having a sexual relationship with someone or having previously obtained consent gives nobody the right to sexually assault them.
And finally, to those arguing that women shouldn’t be allowed to prosecute historical sexual offences because too much time has passed:
As I said yesterday in a previous post. Would you tell a 32-year-old who was raped by their uncle at 12 that they’ve missed their opportunity for justice?
Would you say the same to someone who finally found the courage to speak up at 50?
Of course, every defendant deserves a fair trial. But victims deserve access to justice too.
Russell Brand received a four-week trial. The jury heard the evidence and unanimously convicted him of rape and three sexual assaults. He has not been targeted by the matrix as Andrew Tate likes to put it.
You are entitled to question a verdict or support an appeal.
But stop blaming victims, dismissing evidence you haven’t examined and pretending that the passage of time makes rape somehow acceptable.
Rape doesn’t have an expiry date. Justice shouldn’t either.
Very few have done any research on this website. They immediately jump to defend Russell Brand who is now a convicted rapist. And I am adamant many more will come forward now.
I might mute the word Russell and brand so I can now move on with my day.
I guess having two daughters makes me feel quite emotional about this, as well as what happened to both of my parents and some of my friends.
T
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
The testimony of the then 16 year old schoolgirl, who accused Brand, is one of the most harrowing and horrific things that I’ve ever read.
It’s being reported that she has come forward to add her case. I hope she gets justice and they throw the book at the bastard.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
The judge apparently relied on inconsistencies in Berki's changing account and his assessment of her motives.
But how could he assess her credibility and motives, without hearing her evidence tested at trial?
Particularly when she had no lawyer?
inforrm.org/2015/11/03/case-…
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
Why?
Because Brand (and his then-girlfriend, Jemima Goldsmith) obtained a permanent, life-long, injunction against her.
Brand/Goldsmith said Ms Berki's accusations amounted to harassment, which caused them "anxiety and distress".
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
Now Russell Brand's been convicted of rape, we need to talk about Sylvie Berki. Because she can't speak for herself.
In 2014, Ms Berki said she'd been assaulted by Russell Brand.
But if she talks about it, even now, she risks jail.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
It was always as clear as day that Russell Brand was a disgusting twat. That said I feel incredibly sorry for those women who have been conned by him, and impressed by the bravery of those who came forward.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
I've kept my gob shut as I had to. I know multiple women, high profile public figure women, who have told me various incidents that they were involved in or a close friend of theirs was.
Russell Brand was and likely still is, a pervy rapey smelly (yep, he stinks) fucking cunt.
And, as per fucking usual, 'everyone knew' in TV world.
My thoughts and prayers are with his cell mate who'll have to put up with the cunt.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
I worked for John Lewis for 25 years, until I was sacked for personal opinions that the woke, modern John Lewis didn't agree with.
It was once a great company to work for and a true British institution.
The Christmas adverts were the highlight of the year. They captured the mood of the nation, they made us laugh and they made us cry, and everyone looked forward to the moment they were released.
This new advert says more about modern Britain than I think John Lewis intended. It captures entitlement and woke madness gone overboard. It captures zero discipline, no boundaries and no respect for the elderly.
The one thing this advert captures perfectly is how far this country has fallen.
That's my take, as someone who gave that company 25 years.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
Totally agree. It’s possibly the worst advert I’ve ever seen for anything. Would actively dissuade me from going to @JohnLewisRetail - what on earth were they thinking?
I can’t express how much I hate this John Lewis advert. Spoilt entitled, rude and overindulged children. Useless, weak parents. Terrible mauling of the Rolling Stones. Yet again ANOTHER cliched out-of-touch grandparent we are all supposed to roll our eyes at. Urgh. It’s as bad as that ‘get consent to hug your grandkids’ one.
mol.im/a/16259695
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
My Welsh grandparents used to keep my sister and I happy with bottles of pop (from the pop man’s van), walks in nature, putting my grandfather’s white hair in bunches (patiently borne) and generally the incredible warmth of being in the small home (cobwebby outside toilet for many years) of two people who gave us such unconditional love.
How rich we felt in their love.
I hate the John Lewis advert - ugly, materialistic, totally not getting the magic of grandparents.
@JohnLewisRetail
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
l’ve had no orders for my nature jewellery collection. I know they’re expensive but the materials for each cost £70 or more & I can’t charge nothing for several hours’ making time on each piece. They used to sell out.
I make intricate casts of real flowers incl. snowdrop, lily of the valley & wild carrot, nature finds such as dragonfly wings & feathers & tiny 3d wearable sculptures of much-love birds. I’m taking pre-orders for🎄. A RT would really really help my small business rn, thankyou x: etsy.com/uk/shop/silverpebbl…
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
CRAZY SCENES IN GRAVELINES, NORTHERN FRANCE!
A large group of illegal migrants openly making their way through this small, beautiful French town towards the beach.
I suspect they are preparing for an attempted crossing to Britain tomorrow.
No authorities in sight. No oversight. No attempt to hide.
Just another extraordinary scene unfolding in broad daylight.
Gravelines, France | 28 October 2026
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
The critics like to say it is all vibes. The vibes really matter when you see empathy and humanity rooted in something he has long supported
The Prime Minister presented a special recognition award at the Pride of Britain Awards to honour the founders of Andy’s Man Club, Elaine and Luke.
In 2016, Andy Roberts, Elaine’s son and Luke’s brother-in-law, tragically took his own life at just 23 years old. The pair went on to create Andy's Man Club, a male suicide prevention charity that has grown from a single group in Halifax to more than 360 groups nationwide.
Through its mission to break the stigma around men’s mental health, Andy’s Man Club has saved thousands of lives and inspired men to speak up when they need help 🤝
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
Hey @owenjonesjourno what do you propose to do about these women who won't have sex with the men you want them to have sex with?
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
In 2026, women are having to explain very very slowly, that choosing to date who we choose, rather than prioritising men's feelings, is equality and our absolute rock solid right.
Owen's 'progressive' misogyny is showing yet again. And it taints his every single take on everything.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
If you want to know whose side Reform are on, look at how their millionaire leaders and far right backers like @kelvmackenzie are lining up to attack trade unions and ordinary workers and defend those dodgy billionaire donors. Just as this piece of shit lined up to attack Liverpool fans after Hillsborough , he’s back attacking ordinary people to defends the establishment.
Trade unions money comes from millions of ordinary workers, who if they wish can pay a few pounds into their union’s political fund, with a legal right to opt out. The union members decide whether to affiliate to the Labour Party and how much to contribute. It’s regulated, accounted for and declared and is millions of individuals making small donations .
What a contrast Reform are . They have just been bunged £72 MILLION by TWO dodgy multi millionaires. One, Ben Delo pleaded guilty in the US to breaking anti-money-laundering law but was pardoned by Trump.
And the second, Christopher Harborn is the man who previously gave Farage a £5m “personal gift” which Farage broke Parliamentary rules by failing to declare.
Both come from vast fortunes in crypto generating no wealth or economic benefit for anyone but the millionaire donors. And the public has nothing remotely like the visibility over where the wealth behind those fortunes ultimately came from that it has over regulated trade-union political funds.
Millions of workers chipping in a few quid: Reform attacks it.
Two billionaires handing over £72m: Reform pockets it and praises donors.
Let’s never again hear the claim Reform is a party of working people. It’s a party that hates ordinary worker, led by millionaires and bought for them by billionaires.
Wildlife Tweets 🌿🍄 retweeted
Personally, I’m absolutely positive that what the UK needs now is a government backed largely by elderly white people who dress up as the Battle of Agincourt, believe shit they see on FB and attack hecklers with their walking sticks. China must be laughing its bloody head off.