15,000,000 unvetted Indian migrants and migrants mandated by the EU to take jobs, housing, food & healthcare from Canadians. Elites have implemented Canadian Population Replacement scheme. Carney’s joining EU will cost $6B per year so that in 2029 he can be elected EU President.

Canada’s ‘associate’ status with EU will be closer to membership than anything done before, officials say theglobeandmail.com/politics…

How is it possible that in a democracy the governing party can repeatedly avoid accountability? Canadians have every right to question where their tax dollars are going, who controls the spending and why parliamentary scrutiny is being resisted. This Liberal government has become synonymous with secrecy, obstruction and unanswered questions. Transparency isn’t optional and accountability isn’t a favour granted by the government. It’s an obligation owed to Canadians. What exactly are they so afraid of revealing? We seem to be under a dictatorship.

‼️🚨Prime Minister Carney plans to borrow more in just FIVE YEARS than generations of Canadian prime ministers before Justin Trudeau borrowed in our ENTIRE history. This is a mountain of debt that will crush my generation and my children's generation. #cdnpoli

“Canadian Transportation Agency has proven to be incapable of implementing… While we are prepared to get this backlog eliminated, we are no longer prepared to subject taxpayers to the responsibility and burden of paying for this system.” — @stevenmackinnon

Mark Carney: the heart wants what the heart wants. (And what he wants is to be European again).

In a couple days the Canada-EU Summit will be held in Montreal to move Canada towards an Associate Member...but there are some interesting things happening. Quebec Premier Paul St-Pierre Plamondon was banned from speaking at the Summit. France, Germany and other key EU countries are pushing back against Canada's joining the EU as Associate Member. These are our biggest allies. Mark Carney promotes it as: > Give young Canadians opportunities to study, work and travel. > More opportunities for Canadian businesses. > Canadian researchers will have more depth of opportunities. And somehow being tied to the EU will make Canada " a more independent, more sovereign nation". How?! The reality is that Canadian youth and businesses already have access to all these relationships and opportunities with the EU. So what is this really about??

I think Carney wants to tie Canada to the EU. Then become Ursula of the EU and run the world!!!

Harper had that set up and Trudeau stopped it from happening. Buying Chiefs' votes?

"Access to safe drinking water is an internationally recognized human right." @MarkJCarney is investing over $12B in First Nations communities, targeting critical infrastructure on reserves: - $3.5B for education - $4B for affordable housing - $4.5B for clean water & wastewater systems

We are repeatedly told that the case against Israel must be overwhelming because the accusation is echoed by international institutions, NGOs, academics, politicians, and enormous crowds in Western capitals. That is precisely why @natan_sharansky’s latest essay is so important. His central argument is simple: consensus is not proof, and history should have taught Jews never to confuse the two. Sharansky reaches back to Ahad Ha’am’s writing about the blood libel, an accusation that endured for centuries because it was accepted, repeated, and legitimized by the institutions and authorities of its time. It became culturally respectable and socially unquestioned. It was still false. That history matters because the mechanism has not disappeared. When the same accusation is repeated by the United Nations, NGOs, academics, politicians, and major media organizations, the repetition itself begins to acquire moral force. People stop asking whether the claim has actually been proven and start asking how anyone could possibly still disagree. That is how consensus hardens into orthodoxy. And once that happens, dissent is no longer treated as disagreement. It is treated as evidence of moral failure. Sharansky deserves credit for refusing that trap. His argument is not that Israel should be beyond scrutiny. Israel should be scrutinized rigorously, and Israelis themselves have never been reluctant to criticize their own government, military, or institutions. But scrutiny is not the same thing as submission. There is a profound difference between examining evidence honestly and accepting an accusation because enough voices have declared the debate over. History gives us no reason to trust consensus blindly. Institutions can be wrong. Experts can be wrong. Entire societies can be wrong. And Jews, perhaps more than anyone, should understand how dangerous it is when a false accusation becomes so widely accepted that disbelief itself is treated as suspect. Sharansky’s message is ultimately one of moral confidence: examine ourselves, demand high standards, correct genuine wrongdoing when it occurs, but do not outsource judgment to the crowd. The size of the consensus tells us how widely an idea has spread. It does not tell us whether the idea is true. shorturl.at/FPCq4

I have quite literally heard this from every single Prime Minister in every meeting and policy room going back to when I first arrived in Ottawa in early 2000s. Can someone explain to me how we keep doling out funding for safe drinking water but no one on FN reserves ever seems have any?