̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
🌟 Upcoming New Listing 🌟
🤩 #BitMart will list QRL @QRLedger soon!
👀Keep an eye on our socials for further announcements.
👇Share in the comments what you like about this project.
🔥Register Now: bitmart.com/en-US/invite/QRL…
#QRL #BitMartListing
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
We’re building more than quantum computers. We're building a system that uses quantum to solve real-world problems that were once considered impossible.
Last month, IBM laid out a transparent roadmap detailing how we’ll achieve quantum advantage. Let’s take a closer look.🧵
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Performance in quantum computing isn’t just about qubit count. Willow delivers across the full system—gates, reset, readout, calibration—resulting in benchmark-leading quality and 5x improvement in T₁ times over our previous chips → goo.gle/4fgRDLV
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
For the BTC bros proudly sharing this while mocking quantum computing same author, folks. Whether it’s classical or quantum factoring, you’ve got a problem.
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Scientists demonstrate a process called "magic state distillation" in logical qubits for the first time, meaning we can now build quantum computers that are both error-free and more powerful than supercomputers.
livescience.com/technology/c…
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
IBM and IonQ promise some amazing logical qubit counts in quantum computing. Kipu Quantum is squeezing everything possible out of the stack on these systems while we approach fault tolerance. Learn how in the latest episode of The Post-Quantum World. youtu.be/U3gU2RSBsSs?si=Cuev…
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Did Quantum Fears Prompt a Bitcoin Whale to Make an $8 Billion Move?
A dormant Bitcoin whale has transferred $8.6 billion worth of BTC from eight wallets last used in 2011.
Key points:
→ $8.6B in BTC moved from Satoshi-era wallets to modern SegWit addresses
→ Transfer followed OP_RETURN spam campaigns targeting legacy wallets
→ Adds to broader discussion around quantum security in crypto
→ Institutions like BlackRock have recently flagged quantum as a risk factor
Read here: hubs.ly/Q03wcjrB0
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
There exists a critical question for those using bitcoin and running bitcoin nodes:
What happens when quantum computers someday enter the scene and begin liquidating quantum-vulnerable coins (QVCs) ?
There are at least five choices:
1. Do nothing. Let liquidations happen. All 6.2 million QVCs could be moved within hours or days by those with Cryptanalytically Relevant Quantum Computers. The impact this could have on markets could be profound, akin to historical drawdowns of 95% or more. This could have significant effects on the security of the network.
2. Burn or freeze the coins - this could be considered confiscatory, but it protects the network with minimal complexity.
3. Distribute the coins - this is also confiscatory. The coins will be returned to the coinbase and added directly to the block subsidy, and may also have some market impacts (if you think this is the way to go, leave a comment).
4. Hourglass v1 - restrict the spending of early P2PK coins to one transaction per block. This unfortunately solves only a small portion of the problem because P2PK coins only represent roughly 27% of all QVCs, and the timeline for liquidation is still relatively short (~8 months).
5. Hourglass v2 - restrict the spending of all QVCs to protect the network and distribute the coins over the course of more than a century.
Are there any other choices? What's your opinion?
Be sure to share this poll to boost visibility so others can have their say.
42%Do nothing. Liquidations.
26%Burn or freeze coins
4%Hourglass v1
28%Hourglass v2
296 votes • Final results ̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Thanks! 🫡 a 6-bit ECC key is the next target. It should take about ~4 to 5 minutes to complete.
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Regarding encryption standard upgrade:
What deprecated means as of 2030 for RSA and ECDSA
What disallowed means for RSA, ECDSA, EdDSA as of 2035
NIST's "Transition to Post-Quantum Cryptography Standard" initial public draft report.
csrc.nist.gov/pubs/ir/8547/i…
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Error correction is a key component of tomorrow’s large-scale quantum computers. Today we’re excited to report the experimental demonstration of a color code system that provides an advantageous alternative to the well studied surface code. Check it out →goo.gle/4ljZwli
ALT Comparing the triangular color code to the square surface code. The geometry of the color code is advantageous because it uses fewer physical qubits for the same code distance.
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
The recent blog post by @conordeegan at blog.projecteleven.com/posts… made me wonder how close we are to quantum-resistant Bitcoin. Many new proposals and research have emerged in the past year.
How far are we from post-quantum resistant Bitcoin?
13%1-2 years
27%3-4 years
60%5+
30 votes • Final results ̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
When CxO's cannot articulate what AI and DLT mean ...
linkedin.com/pulse/you-fit-l… via @LinkedIn
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
A CPU can add 32bit numbers in a nanosecond.
In my quantum factoring estimate, I also used 32bit adders. They're a bit slower. Each superposed add costs TWO MILLION nanoseconds.
Quantum factoring isn't fast because of fast operations; it's fast because it uses *few* operations.
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
In corp. governance, a CEO calling out a CTO often signals misalignment with strategy or execution, usually followed by internal scrutiny.
For @P3b7_, Quantum, though it wasn’t before, is now a pending issue to be addressed, since @_pgauthier has a sales company in the mix ✅
̶ᴾ̶ᵒ̶ˢ̶ᵗ Quantum Sure, Not 𝕏 | Ω retweeted
Excited to share that IBM is teaming up with @SeeqcUs as part of DARPA’s Quantum Benchmarking Initiative.
This NY-based collab explores how SFQ tech could enable compact, efficient quantum control—key for scaling.
See prnewswire.com/news-releases…
