Feminism is a lie and I help you figure out what to do about that likemotherlikedaughter.org/2…

The SPLC called debanking Christians a “conspiracy theory.” The Treasury Department just called it fact — and implicated the SPLC! Read the damning report that exposes their hypocrisy and financial weaponization. catholicism.org/the-splc-cal… via @SBC_Catholic

Researchers gave office workers who lived under LEDs a 60W incandescent desk lamp. Two weeks later, every one of them had their color vision improve by 25%. In 2022, the government banned those bulbs for "wasting" energy. But that "waste" is actually one of the most important nutrients our bodies depend upon, and the improvement lasted for weeks after the lamps were taken away (while nothing changed in the controls). Decades of forgotten research show the artificial light we replaced it with is a root cause of many inexplicable illnesses (e.g., insomnia, obesity, cancer, and hyperactivity in children). Here I show what that research found and why Senator Mike Lee’s bill to bring these bulbs back, which has now cleared a Senate committee, matters.🧵 midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-h…

Two months before Allie was kidnapped, someone vandalized three of the six Flock cameras in nearby Woodruff, South Carolina. Allie's kidnapper almost certainly drove by one of the downed cameras. If those cameras hadn't been vandalized, Allie could have been home much sooner.

Cardinal Fernández has said his latest document on transmitting the faith interests neither “progressives nor conservatives” “Pope Francis’s call for a renewed missionary proclamation of the kerygma hasn’t changed the pastoral plans of dioceses and movements,” he said. He also commented on homosexuals, divorced & re-married who “feel rejected by the Church” Read on @CatholicHerald

Glenna did an unusual thing that people typically don't do: she checked a citation in a law review article to see whether the citation said what the authors claimed it did. She found that the citation said the opposite of what the authors claimed it did. She then asked the editor of the law review for a correction. The editor did not reply to the request. She then asked the authors for comment on the incorrect citation. The authors acknowledged that the citation was erroneous and regretted the error. The authors then insisted that the citation did not matter to their actual argument because nothing in their argument depended on the citation being right. Glenna then wrote a post explaining why the erroneous citation was in fact important to their actual argument, and why the erroneous citation also exposed a wider ignorance of the subject on which the authors were writing. (She claims, convincingly, that it's important to know what sex is in order to understand what sex discrimination is, and that being able to define what sex is is an inextricable aspect of knowing what sex is.) I consulted with some lawyer friends in a chat group who helpfully explained to me that no one ever reads footnotes, no one checks the underlying references, and no one cares if they are correct or not because law review articles like the one Murray and Shaw published are merely political advocacy masquerading as legal scholarship that no one reads, and therefore not to expect the Supreme Court Review to issue a correction for a citation that the authors are on the record admitting was erroneous. Do I have all that right, @williambaude?

“The World Health Organization” now states on its website: “COVID-19 vaccination can cause multiple sclerosis due to cross-reactive CD4+ T cells that recognize the spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 and myelin peptides.” In other words, your own immune system destroys the nerve pathways and then attacks your brain and spinal cord. This data was available during the lockdowns but was labeled as a “conspiracy theory” and censored by social media.

You don't need to be a scholar to know that hormones mess with your behavior. Just ask teenage boys and menopausal women.

It would be difficult to find something more antisemitic than this statement by the Chicago archdiocese in which they imply that supporting child murder is central to Jewish identity. That is a lie. There are many pro-life Jews.

I will gain zero friends in saying this, but it's the truth: Hannity is a baptized Catholic who remains subject to canon law. A number of Catholics attended Hannity's 2nd wedding in an Episcopal Church. They should not have attended, according to Catholic doctrine. Truth hurts.