Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary) profile picture

Follower of Jesus Christ; Criminologist; Civil Rights and Due Process Advocate ⚖️

Massachusetts, USA
Joined October 2016
Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)Photo by Madam Secretary (@_MadamSecretary)
This head nod by Sue Clancy to Lindsay says everything. #LindsayClancy
114
151
24
5,731
770,800
Madam Secretary retweeted
💥Morrissey claims they didn’t charge Mathew Farwell because they were constrained by the medical examiners suicide determination, but they charged Karen Read with murdering John O’Keefe, even though the medical examiner ruled it undermined. 🤡
70
86
5
798
8,427
Madam Secretary retweeted
The Norfolk District Attorney’s Office just released a statement following Matthew Farwell’s conviction for killing Sandra Birchmore and her unborn child. Part of the statement reads: “Its ability to prosecute was constrained by the finding of the Office of the Chief Medical Examiner that the manner of death was suicide.” It is important to add context. During opening statements in Farwell’s trial, Assistant U.S. Attorney Torey Cummings told the jury that Massachusetts State Police troopers assigned to the Norfolk DA’s Office: “very quickly told others, including the medical examiner, that this was definitively a suicide and there was no foul play. They told the medical examiner, no need to treat this death as suspicious.”
164
143
43
923
85,910
Madam Secretary retweeted
🚨#BREAKING: Former Stoughton, Mass. Police Officer Matthew Farwell was convicted today of murdering Sandra Birchmore and causing the death of her unborn son. Farwell began grooming & sexually exploiting Birchmore when she was 15-years-old & member of the Stoughton Police Department’s Explorers' Program. He murdered her eight years later and staged it to look like a suicide. #FBI Boston's Special Agent in Charge Ted Docks joined MA U.S. Attorney Leah Foley at a news conference immediately following today's verdict where he made it clear that if you attempt to silence witnesses through violence, justice will find you. Learn more: ow.ly/65oI5105Ay4
59
98
12
733
15,452
Madam Secretary retweeted
God bless you all. I'm going to go cry now. Cashapp: cash.app/$grantsmithellis Venmo: account.venmo.com/u/Grant-E1 Paypal = paypal.com/paypalme/GrantEll…
64
48
9
1,076
22,359
Madam Secretary retweeted
BREAKING NEWS: Matthew Farwell has been found GUILTY on both charges as to the murder of Sandra Birchmore and her unborn Baby Boy. The jury deliberated for a total of 15 hours and 30 minutes.
292
441
136
3,266
94,087
Praise God!!! Justice for #SandraBirchmore and #BabyBirchmore
BREAKING NEWS: Matthew Farwell has been found GUILTY on both charges as to the murder of Sandra Birchmore and her unborn Baby Boy. The jury deliberated for a total of 15 hours and 30 minutes.
1
254
Several scenarios would have led to the feds getting involved. The way my brain works: Scenario 1 - Sandra threatened to tell MF's wife. She eventually follows through. MF's wife contacts a divorce attorney and tells all. Divorce attorney contacts AG's office. Feds get involved. #SandraBirchmore
1
2
647
#SandraBirchmore I'm not totally convinced the jury is stuck on the nexus aspect of proving that MF killed Sandra to prevent info from getting to the Feds somehow, some way. If the jury was paying attention, which it sounds like they were very engaged, it shouldn't be difficult to make that connection. If Stoughton PD operated in compliance with their sworn and statutorily required duties under MGLc 6E, § 8 and 555 CMR 1.00, it is CERTAIN the feds would have been contacted. (1/2)
3
16
4,474
Stoughton PD was well aware of who Sandra was. She spent all of her teens in the Explorers program. A friend of Sandra's called Stoughton PD and reported the relationship. An internal investigation would have likely uncovered the extent of MF and Sandra's relationship and subsequently that MF violated 18 USC § 242, Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law - a federal offense. Stoughton PD had the duty to investigate. Had they done so, they would have uncovered MF's federal violation and been required to report it to the feds. Had Stoughton PD not prioritized covering for MF, Sandra might still be alive. Stoughton PD should be right next to MF at the defense table. (2/2)
3
226
Madam Secretary retweeted
Hello from inside Boston's Moakley Courthouse, where I am first in line on the fifth floor as we await the resumption of verdict watch in the Sandra Birchmore and Matthew Farwell trial. Jurors wanted to stay until 6:30pm on Friday, but they went home when told 6pm was their cap.
31
36
5
1,172
72,836
Madam Secretary retweeted
This is where the Towel News Verdict Clock stands now.
43
16
3
619
31,634
Madam Secretary retweeted
Walking into the courthouse for the last time in the fight for justice for Sandra Birchmore before jury deliberations. What began as a story that deserved to be heard became a fight that so many refused to walk away from. Through every hearing, every revelation, every difficult moment, and every step along the way, you showed up. You listened. You questioned. You cared. Thank you to everyone who has stood beside Sandra, who has spoken her name, and who has refused to let her story fade into silence. She deserved so much more from this world. She deserved protection, she deserved truth, and she deserves justice. As I walk through these courthouse doors, I carry with me the voices of everyone who has helped keep her story alive. For Sandra. Always. 🩵🫶 #JusticeForSandraBirchmore
60
81
6
1,262
16,772
Anything you can do to spread the word about this is helpful. I reached out to various mainstream media outlets. You'd think "Hey, this guy has raised huge money for charity" would get some attention. No interest from them. It's up to us.
16
151
3
435
11,723
In my opinion, finding out a prospective juror omitted or provided false/inaccurate info on their questionnaire gives more weight to the accusations by the foreperson and others that said juror was unable, or refused, to follow the judge’s instructions on the law during deliberations… #LindsayClancy
1
12
924
Madam Secretary retweeted
‼️ GIVEAWAY ‼️ We're giving away 2 tickets to the Patriots vs. Green Bay Packers game on Sunday, 11/8, plus 2 General Admission tickets to @TheHall, open from 10 AM through kickoff! 🏈 To enter: 1. Follow @PatriotPlace 2. Like and Repost this video! Good luck! Giveaway closes on Friday 11/6.
275
3,859
48
4,216
135,699
Interesting … RE: dishonest answers by prospective jurors during voir dire.
1
1
4
331
Madam Secretary retweeted
Oooooof Lie Detected‼️
DUE DILIGENCE You will see that the judge had already told the jurors to stop using electronic devices AFTER — and I repeat, AFTER — jurors had allegedly been using their phones during deliberations to look up definitions. Meaning The Judge already told them to stop. So the court already knows There were also allegations of jurors posting on social media and discussing with friends what case they were deliberating. And then there’s the allegation involving a [blank juror] posting in a Karen Read Facebook group. Yet, once again, Michael gets outed. If multiple jurors had phones and were communicating with people outside the courthouse, why are we focusing on only one person? And as for Mr. Kevin Reddington, I’m not worried about that. Because if we’re going to start looking at Michael’s phone records, then let’s be consistent: Let’s look at EVERYONE’S phone records. Don’t single out one juror. If Michael’s communications are relevant, then the same standard should apply across the board. And if we really want to go deeper, here’s the bigger question: Why were phones allowed in the deliberation room in the first place? 🤔🤔
3
4
56
5,773
Additionally, a juror cannot act as a rogue prosecutor. If the only way a juror can justify a conviction is by explaining alternative theories (that the prosecution did not present, nor prove) then the legal requirement of **proof beyond a reasonable doubt** has not been met, and the juror's lawful vote should be "not guilty." #LindsayClancy
“As I tried to explain **different possible theories** during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented.” Well, if a juror is proposing alternative theories to convince others of the defendant’s guilt, the juror is likely violating the core legal principle that a defendant can only be convicted on the specific case and evidence presented by the prosecution.
17
14
78
2,689
“As I tried to explain **different possible theories** during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented.” Well, if a juror is proposing alternative theories to convince others of the defendant’s guilt, the juror is likely violating the core legal principle that a defendant can only be convicted on the specific case and evidence presented by the prosecution.
Michael Péguy Desronvil. American Hero & Champion of Justice. 100% (ALL) of your generous donations on "Stand With the Juror" will go directly to Michael. 0% (ZERO) will go to lawyers. "I didn't have any doubts. As I tried to explain different possible theories during deliberation, I kept getting cut off as if I had doubts based on the evidence presented. Based on all the physical evidence, key witnesses, and what the prosecution presented, I thought it was enough proof that she (Clancy) knew exactly what she was doing and planned." -Michael Péguy Desronvil
12
6
2
63
5,088