Some people might be focusing too much on the discovery of CRISPR itself. What’s important and exciting here is that you don’t need to have skills to find something from existing data. Even more importantly, this is the autonomous science. It will be good and bad for science.
It’s academia problem, not science.
Purpose of scientific endeavors is to expand our knowledge and improve our lives. It doesn’t matter who has more papers or where ideas come from.
Use of publication number as a major indicator of productivity and trajectory is the problem.
Generative AI tools are increasingly being used in science. This raises a question: what counts as human authorship when some of a researcher’s work is mediated by AI?
go.nature.com/4gFfQMS
Too long. Make it shorter and more concise.
Your cold emails can be the golden ticket to your dream PhD lab. Here’s how:
Most applicants treat cold emails like polite introductions. That’s a mistake. A PI isn’t looking for politeness. They are scanning for signal. Can this person think, contribute, and reduce my uncertainty?
Here’s a research-oriented, high-leverage approach:
1. Start with a paper, not a profile
Don’t begin with “I’m interested in your work.” Begin with a specific claim from one of their recent papers.
Identify a gap, assumption, or unexplored extension.
2. Write a 3 to 4 sentence micro-proposal
Structure it like this:
Observation: What they did
Tension: What remains unclear or limited
Idea: Your proposed extension
Method hint: How you would approach it
This signals you are already thinking like a researcher, not an applicant.
3. Attach proof of execution, not just potential
Link 1 to 2 artifacts only:
A GitHub repo
A preprint
A tight 2-page research note
Each should directly relate to the idea you pitched.
4. Use the adjacent expertise angle
Labs do not just need clones. Position yourself as someone who brings a method or perspective they do not currently have but clearly need.
5. Ask a low-friction question
Instead of “Are you accepting students?” ask:
“Would this direction align with your current priorities, or am I missing a key constraint?”
This invites engagement, not rejection.
6. Timing is strategic, not random
Email right after:
A new paper release
A conference talk
A grant announcement
You are entering when attention is already on new ideas.
7. Subject line equals hypothesis, not a request.
Good: “Extending your X paper: idea on Y limitation”
8. Keep it under 350-400 words
Constraint forces clarity. Clarity signals intelligence.
DM me “cold-email” if you also want to create highly magnetic cold-emails that turn into interview offers.
OpenAI will probably claim authorships, patents, and “idea fees” in near future. Time to get AIs running on your computers locally.
Introducing Prism, a free workspace for scientists to write and collaborate on research, powered by GPT-5.2.
Available today to anyone with a ChatGPT personal account: prism.openai.com/
科学者はお互いの仕事をrespectしながらcriticalに査読するのだけどもこの査読者はオブラートに包むことを知らないか自分もそのようなレビューが返ってきたからかな。つまらなかったり馬鹿馬鹿しいと思うのならどこが悪くどうすれば良くなるのか言えばいいのにね。
先行研究の調査
仮説構築
実験の選択
データ解析
Publicとのコミュニケーション
が科学者の仕事になるんだじゃにかな。AIだと細かいところやミスを追求しようとしないだろうからそこから生まれるものを見逃す。AIはカビの周りに細菌は繁殖しないって気づかないと思うし気づいても研究しない。
Replying to @_daichikonno
論文執筆がここまで自動化されると、
「研究者の仕事とは何なのか」を改めて問い直す必要がある。
・先行研究の調査
・仮説の立案
・データの収集
・データの解析
・論文執筆
どこまで任せて良くて、どこからは人間がすべきなのか。
この先数年で、研究者という職が再定義されそうです。
My advisor once told me to have two different types of projects; one which could be boring but gives you a paper, another gets you excited but it may not work out. It is always nice to have something to show that you accomplished something.
🤦
Replying to @NIH
➡️ Shorten the eligibility window and refocus review criteria for a key mentored career development award (K99/R00) to facilitate more rapid transition of postdoctoral scholars.
Problem is not the ChatGPT itself but the authors who decided to publish without any effort of editing, the editors and reviewers who didn’t even read the first sentence of introduction, and the academic nature encouraging mass production of papers. Blame the right ones.
Record what you eat and calculate calories. It’s as simple as calories in, calories out. It doesn’t matter how “busy” you are or how much you “tried” unless you understand what you are doing. Clarify a goal. Reducing weight is not losing fat. Work smarter, not harder.
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Drtats retweeted
One of my graduate students dropped by my office, exasperated, and said, "I don't know how to innovate. So, how can I do a PhD?".
I erased my whiteboard and began listing strategies for generating new research ideas. They left reassured and excited!
As #professors, we mentor and make knowledge accessible to empower our students. I hope this is helpful to others! #academicchatter #Phdlife #Highered
This👇
Replying to @ithinkwellHugh
Always great to see how backward minded the writers are for these self-serving takes. If an advisor isn't good at advising, they should be a research tech instead. Stop trying to make grad students accommodate their terrible advisors. Horrible take, do better.
Can someone help? I hate to see the years of hard work wasted
📸 Look at this post on Facebook facebook.com/share/p/5Stc65s…
Obsidian is way better and free…
Why I use Notion to organize my PhD research
Maya Gosztyla describes the database tool as a ‘second brain’, helping her to coordinate her work.
go.nature.com/408Ba4A
Drtats retweeted
PhD奨学金(給付型)@シンガポール国立大学
弊研究所ではPhD学生を 9名募集
・約34万円/月 (来年から現役生を含め増額予定。増額幅は調整中)
・学費免除
・寮完備(1年目は確定)
・渡航費(最大約8万円)&生活準備金(約11万円)支給
・分野に興味があれば経験不問
・8月入学
・2024年1月14日〆切
詳細↓





























