Pinned Tweet
"Complex issues are not assisted by conclusory mantras, or the reflexive reframing of discussion as bigotry."
Why does the far-left always assume that its voters are the ones who aren’t organised enough to enrol? Seems a bit insulting.
Nemo retweeted
That the Communist hammer and sickle isn’t commonly regarded as evil and offensive as the Nazi swastika is a failure of education.
“Dear Italian students, who today take to the streets carrying flags with the hammer and sickle and wearing T-shirts emblazoned with ‘CCCP’,” began an open letter in Italian by Lithuanian expat Neringa Budryt.
“I would like to ask you a question: do you truly know what the symbols you carry represent? And do you know what would have happened to many of you had you openly demonstrated in countries living under the oppression of communist regimes?
Let me tell you something. It is easy to display a red flag when, for you, communism is merely an abstract idea of equality, social justice, and rebellion against the system. It is easy to wear a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it when you have never experienced the reality of a communist regime.
We come from that part of Europe where communism was not a T-shirt, a symbol of rebellion, or a romanticized notion of equality. It was the system in which we lived—a system we never chose.
We know the history of Soviet repression, Stalinist purges, the Gulags, and mass deportations. Above all, we know the word "Siberia"—a place to which thousands of innocent people were forcibly deported, simply for thinking differently.
In Siberia—amidst freezing cold, starvation, and forced labor—many lost their lives; those who survived carried the scars of that experience forever. Entire families were torn apart, and generations were denied the chance to live freely in their own homeland.
In the countries of the Soviet bloc, censorship, political police, surveillance, and the suppression of dissent drastically curtailed individual freedoms.
We grew up in a system where state control permeated even our daily lives. At school, we were required to wear the red necktie of the "Pioneers." We were monitored; they tracked where we went and even whether we attended church. Even faith—a choice that should belong to an individual’s own conscience—could become a cause for suspicion.
We used to celebrate Christmas with our windows blacked out, to ensure no one would see us and report us. Because it was forbidden—just like so many other things: jeans, rock music, and all the symbols of a Western lifestyle. My mother returned from a Soviet labor camp. And do you know what happened to her? She was barred from continuing her education because she had been labeled an enemy of communism.
Under a communist regime, you could not protest. You risked arrest, imprisonment, interrogation, persecution—and, in certain historical contexts, even death. In the Soviet Union and other communist regimes, political dissent could cost you your freedom and your life.
Demonstrations independent of the authorities were not a guaranteed right; they were often suppressed by force.
That is why it strikes me to see young Italians proudly displaying the hammer and sickle—symbols associated with regimes that persecuted and imprisoned millions of people.
Today, you are free to take to the streets, shout against the government, criticize institutions, and wave your flags precisely because you live in a democracy that grants you these freedoms. Under an authoritarian regime of that kind, protesting against those in power could have landed you in prison.
This is not about denying the existence of social injustices, inequalities, or the right to fight for a better world. You are free to take to the streets to demand a more just society—but you should not idealize a system that denied so many people the very things you are free to exercise today: the right to choose, to believe, to speak, and to dissent. Before wearing a T-shirt with "CCCP" on it, listen to those who experienced that world. Talk to the deportees and their descendants; read the accounts of those who endured the gulags and forced exile to Siberia. Learn what it meant to be stripped of your freedom, your home, your loved ones—and even any prospect of a normal life—simply because of your background or your beliefs.
Before waving the hammer and sickle, please, study history thoroughly.”
This is a must listen.
A chilling insight into just how far these modern-day inquisitors will go to punish anyone who rejects their ideology.
And the tyranny of the regulators will get far worse under Labour/Greens/TPM/TOP. Vote wisely.
Cath Simpson was a mental health nurse at Health NZ for 19 years.
In her own time, on a personal X account, she posted about abortion law, gender identity and Pride. Many people would disagree with what Cath said, and without doubt, some of the posts were crude. She didn't say she was a nurse in the key posts, and never named Health NZ, a patient or a colleague. She deleted the posts more than a year ago and apologised.
The Nursing Council prosecuted her anyway. The Health Practitioners Disciplinary Tribunal censured her, suspended her for two months and ordered her into re-education: a postgraduate qualification, at her own cost, on “power and structural inequity” and “the impacts of colonisation”.
The Tribunal found no evidence she was anything other than a capable nurse. Health NZ’s own decision letter accepted there was “no established incident of discriminatory care”. It had kept her on the frontline for 18 months knowing about the posts. Then, on 9 October, it sacked her without notice for serious misconduct.
Health NZ has gone overseas to recruit mental health nurses. It has just sacked one with 19 years’ service.
For the first time, Cath tells her story in full. Watch it, and share it 👇👇👇👇
youtu.be/2M7IqaFl1ZI
Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142
Not sure that an academic who writes racist diatribes about “white mediocrity” and “whiteness” is in any position to be casting stones here.
Far-left commentator posting about health system failures that occurred under Labour is something of an own goal.
Nemo retweeted
Protesters have occupied the colosseum in Rome.
Where are those lions when you need them?
Elite Maori defending gangs is a great example of luxury beliefs.
Aaron Smale: The Silencing Continues newsroom.co.nz/2026/10/25/aa…
“Opportunity leader Qiulae Wong said New Zealand needed to stop making decisions based on the next election.”
I get the distinct impression that Qiulae Wong sees elections as annoying impediments to the establishment of her technocratic utopia.
rnz.co.nz/news/politics_elec…
Is this a parody account?
Clashes erupt in Paris after largely peaceful protests across France bbc.in/4jyPz62
Both these unfortunate outcomes occurred under Labour, and “serious systemic deficiencies” played a major part. This close to an election, it is journalistic malpractice to not mention this fact at the start of the article or in the headline.
nzherald.co.nz/nz/dunedin-ho…
There’s a big difference between being photographed with gang members as part of the abuse in care inquiry, and taking fangirl selfies surrounded by gang iconography while endorsing gang culture.
nzherald.co.nz/nz/christophe…
The idea that “Islamophobia” and the “far-right” are driving the French riots is utterly absurd. MSM is behaving as if we’re in the pre-social media era, and telling us to reject the evidence of our eyes and ears.
rnz.co.nz/news/world/2118796…
"For more than a century, universities have been intellectual battlegrounds where ideas... are stress-tested through argument. Today, that model is being dismantled from within as activist academics declare that any questioning of trans-affirming theories of gender is off limits"
This is a nothingburger, but if the left want to use it to keep gangs in the headlines that’s fine by me. Ongoing talk about gangs harms the left far more than National.
rnz.co.nz/news/politics_elec…
Nemo retweeted
National proposed banning under-16s from social media. Labour says it will do the same and go further, with a Digital Duty of Care requiring platforms to “protect Kiwis from harmful content".
Free Speech Union Executive Director Jillaine Heather told The Platform she’s open to tackling addictive algorithms and forcing more transparency from the platforms. Neither Labour’s policy nor National’s before it is aimed at illegal content, though. The target is “harmful” content, which always comes down to who decides, and once a government holds that power it sits between adults and their lawful speech.
Promoted by Free Speech Union, PO Box 91811, Victoria Street West, Auckland 1142
The left’s “whero whanau”.
A vote for the left is a vote for normalising this culture.
nzherald.co.nz/hawkes-bay-to…
Would be useful for MSM to ask Labour and Green politicians why they are willing to appear on Bradbury's "Big Hairy Network" show.
And here is Martyn Bradbury telling youth to blame National and to riot if they are too lazy to enroll in time. @nzpolice are busy persecuting a church minister while left wing thugs ACTUALLY incite violence.
Nemo retweeted
'Even when [stonings] are put into practice it is still a blessing from Allah’.
That’s a relief.
Super that this kind man is treating NHS patients and writing educational books for kids 👍
mol.im/a/16222717
Good advice on how to resist the Newspeak of gender ideology.
How to Talk to Someone Who Is Still Inside the Spell, by @pittparents open.substack.com/pub/pitt/p…


















