For men who speak to women on social media forums in the quest for courting them romantically, I have news for you. The woman you are speaking to, by definition, is going to be open to, and probably is speaking to many men other than you. They are selected as such.
The thing with broadcasting yourself publicly as a woman is that it involves a very sharp tradeoff. On one hand, you obviously get attention, potential suitors, etc. But on another, you terminally lose the ability to attract men who will sincerely devote themselves to you.
The correct response to this is to gracefully accept that you are not exclusively desired and respect their autonomy. You can grieve the fact that you are not desired, but please do not try to make them feel guilty for an emotion they are not in control of. Be intentional.
@HallvardHolte if you were too LAZY to read my Substack (haha just kidding), this is the argument made for not policing infidelity here.
My most radical opinions (I really cannot pin them down to one side of the spectrum)
• Passive pedophilic consumption is fine
• Eugenics is good
• Democracy is mostly bad
• Infidelity is fine
• Minors can consent sometimes, adult sometimes cannot
• Extinction is fine
It’s funny. I have had barely any experience with hypergamy. All the women I have expressed interest in actively in real life, the interest has been reciprocated (if decayed of my own making as well). This is partly to do with my Leviathan social skills when I am on the ball.
The face is extremely important. I inadvertently co-liked someone after they sent me a superlike. She had her face covered with an emoji. I just swiped once and, respectfully, ew. Immediately unmatched. Should I buy Tinder Gold for 2 dollars to investigate them more?
I just logged into Tinder for the shits (I don’t actually want to date Indian women, this was for when I’d land in Germany). In two days, I already have 20 likes. Wtf. Was this app not supposed to be anti-male or something? 😭
Whenever I get icked by poop, I tend to think that it is just electrons at the end of the day. But then I’m like, hmm, does the poop exist meaningfully? Before long I am deep into contemplating the mereology of poop and distracted from the immediate aesthetic package.
If you were a doctor examining a healthy patient, dismembering whose organs, and thus killing them — absent their consent — could help you save the lives of five people, would you do it? Yes or no?




