Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd) profile picture

To believe in something is to disbelieve in something

Joined June 2024
Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)Photo by Akshit Singh (@akshit_fbd)
Introducing TTRV: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Vision-Language Models 🧠📸 Most RL methods need labeled data — but humans learn directly from experience. We bring that ability to VLMs. 🚀 TTRV adapts models on-the-fly at inference, with no labels.
2
3
1
4
691
Incredible chart
99
192
71
2,116
200,433
Akshit Singh retweeted
I redid the startup founder signals that lead to top tier VCs investing in the seed / A, after incorporating some feedback. This added ex-frontier lab and cyber security near the top, IIT as a positive, and educated in China as a negative. The main changes were; - extended founding year to 2019-2026, ~2x'd the number of startups - unified and added some signals Here are the new signals:
Which startups are most likely to get an investment from top tier VCs? I looked at ~60 attributes across 5000 startups and these were the 15 strongest. #1 is being from a top tier fund. MBA is a negative signal Full list of signals below:
77
34
37
351
125,789
Akshit Singh retweeted
Recursive self improvement
91
159
55
2,040
120,004
Akshit Singh retweeted
I wrote a blog post detailing the writing approach I took while working on my recent paper: sophielwang.com/blog/paper-w… I describe the behind the scenes for how this paper came to be, why and how I storyboarded figures before running experiments, and some figure design tips! :)
Can “chicken” make a base model reason? 🐔 Yes! Why? With the right first tokens, base models can match RL in reasoning. We trace this to learned training data associations and use a simple data edit to make “chicken” elicit reasoning too. blog: sophielwang.com/cues
34
158
9
1,512
116,843
Akshit Singh retweeted
Fun fact about (some) AI researchers / academics: the more senior you get, the more convinced you become that every new AI idea is something you already invented 20 years ago. Or, even better: wait until something actually works and then try convincing everyone that this is exactly what you’ve been saying all along. I was at a conference where a speaker was presenting their research. One academic stood up and said: what you’re doing is actually something I did a few years ago. The speaker was very polite and said thank you for pointing this out. Then a second researcher stood up and said, well I already did it this 10 years ago, you should cite my work. Then a third person said, I already did all of this about 20 years ago. It was the funniest thing ever.
68
56
30
1,207
133,185
New paper: Architectural Sampling 🧵 Test-time scaling samples many answers from a frozen model. But with temperature, every answer runs the exact same computation. What if diversity came from how the model computes, not just the final token draw?
1
1
64
It also helps models learn from themselves. Swapping temperature rollouts for architectural ones in label-free test-time RL (TTRV) improves accuracy on every benchmark we tried, e.g. +15.3 on A-OKVQA with Qwen3.5-VL-2B.
1
22
Huge thanks to my amazing co-authors: @shyam__marjit @WeiLinCV @leokarlin @jmie_mirza 📄 Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2610.01687 🌐 Project: akshit21112002.github.io/Arc… 💻 Code: github.com/Akshit21112002/Ar… Working on test-time scaling or VLMs? Would love to chat
2
2
45
Akshit Singh retweeted
Presenting today @CVPR Poster 422 11:45-13:45: TTRV: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Vision Language Models Can a VLM improve itself at test time without any labels or external supervision? We show that the answer is YES. 👇 Poster 422 11:45-13:45 akshit21112002.github.io/ttr…
1
4
24
1,813
Akshit Singh retweeted
give me your best #CVPR2026 poster me first: i shamelessly nominate myself 🤡🫣💀🤣 @CVPR @CVPRConf #CVPR
4
8
1
97
10,714
Akshit Singh retweeted
Tomorrow I will travel to Denver, CO for #CVPR2026 🏔️🤖🇺🇸 I'm incredibly excited to dive into the latest research, catch up with old friends, and make new connections. If you are attending and want to chat about Computer Vision, Multi-modal LLMs, or just grab a coffee, let's connect! Please also step by our 3 posters: "VisualOverload: Visual Understanding of VLMs in Really Dense Scenes" Paul Gavrikov, Wei Lin, Jehanzeb Mirza, Soumya Jahagirdar, Muhammad Huzaifa, Sivan Doveh, Serena Yeung-Levy, James Glass, Hilde Kuehne 📍 Main Poster Session 6 on June 7th, 15:30 PM - 17:30 PM, Poster 431 (ExHall A) "TTRV: Test-Time Reinforcement Learning for Vision Language Models" Akshit Singh, Shyam Marjit, Wei Lin, Paul Gavrikov, Serena Yeung-Levy, Hilde Kuehne, Rogerio Feris, Sivan Doveh, James Glass, Jehanzeb Mirza 📍 Main Poster Session 5 on June 7th, 11:45 AM - 13:45 PM Poster 422 (ExHall F) "When Negation Is a Geometry Problem in Vision-Language Models" Fawaz Sammani, Tzoulio Chamiti, Paul Gavrikov, Nikos Deligiannis 📍 MAR Workshop Poster Session June 4th, 11:50 AM - 12:30 PM, Poster 179 See you in Denver!
1
9
431
Akshit Singh retweeted
Outstanding researchers excel at the art of finding problems right at the edge of our understanding — that can actually be solved.
6
31
1
428
28,117
Akshit Singh retweeted
New Anthropic research: Natural Language Autoencoders. Models like Claude talk in words but think in numbers. The numbers—called activations—encode Claude’s thoughts, but not in a language we can read. Here, we train Claude to translate its activations into human-readable text.
580
1,662
615
16,450
2,601,216
Akshit Singh retweeted
New paper! Subliminal learning—transferring hidden signals between language models—is more powerful than we thought. By biasing the teacher with a steering vector instead of a prompt, we achieve strong, consistent transfer, which we use to study its mechanisms. w/@GeorgeMorgulis
6
34
4
317
33,178
Akshit Singh retweeted
AI research used to be in a unique position. Unlike biology or materials science, it was not extremely resource-intensive: 1-2 GPUs could still support top-venue-level work. Unlike math or theoretical physics, it was also not purely intelligence-intensive. (1/3)
6
21
3
727
95,410