Anadish Pal

In 1996 the Irish Times visited Ian Smith in Harare and were surprised that he had no bodyguards or guards and the front door to his house was open to everyone. he went into town without any protection, and was said that Black Zimbabweans would stop him to say they were better off under his government. Mugabe on the other hand never moved without lorries of armed men and armoured cars around him, and his protection kept growing even as the country fell apart. by 2006 inflation was over 1,000% and people were queuing for bread and fuel, yet his government spent US$60k on new sirens for his motorcade. when the zimbabwean media asked what all his security was costing, the president’s office said it was “not for public consumption.” I’ve always thought this says more about the two regimes than anything.

The White House’s state dinner menu for Xi Jinping “The menu showcases American ingredients with Chinese influence, bringing the culinary traditions of both nations together,” the first lady’s office said in its announcement. The first course is a yellow squash velouté featuring wild mushrooms, fresh herbs, crispy pancetta and drizzled scallion oil. Guests will then be served sesame-crusted sea bass with braised baby bok choy, roasted garden eggplant and sauce verte. For dessert, attendees will dine on vanilla crémeux with sour cherry confit topping a walnut frangipane, accompanied by ice cream made with honey gathered at the White House.

This dude is worth a follow 😂 very good 🥂

Floodwaters rushed down from Tibet, killing over many people and leaving thousands missing, yet the Chinese state media calls it the "Nepal flood." Just days before the disaster, someone had already filmed the border hydropower construction sites: nonstop blasting, rock crushers roaring away, tunnels forcibly carved into cliffs, with virtually no safety measures and environmental protection nowhere in sight. Projects like Rasuwagadhi and Upper Trishuli 3A that were washed away—all backed by Chinese capital or Chinese companies. The State government official line is that it was a glacier collapse blocking the river and then bursting. They lie without even drafting a script! The entire river valley has been turned into a construction zone—blasting, digging, and diverting the riverbed—amplifying the risks. Tibet has planned over a hundred hydropower dams, and the Jilong border crossing is being bulldozed right into glacier and seismic zones. Power sent east, water discharged south. Now a landslide dam has formed upstream, liable to burst again at any moment, and downstream Nepal and Bihar in India will be definitely be affected. Chinese obsession with infrastructure will be their own undoing.

I’ll be honest with you: until recently I didn’t know much about the Fabian Society. Maybe it’s because the English know how to be smooth – so correct me if I am getting something wrong. The Fabian Society was founded in London in 1884. Named after Quintus Fabius Maximus – the Roman general famous for defeating Hannibal not through direct confrontation but through patience, attrition, and the slow wearing down of the enemy. The name was chosen deliberately. It was the strategy. Their emblem was a wolf in sheep’s clothing. They chose this themselves. It is worth sitting with that for a moment: an organization that selected, as its own symbol, the image of predatory intent disguised as harmless appearance – deception as the founding principle, the operational method, the thing they were most proud of. Not imposed by critics. Self-selected. They were proud of it. The strategy was simple and devastating: do not storm the institutions. Infiltrate them. Permeate them — their word — gradually, patiently, over generations, placing Fabian-trained people in positions of influence in government, academia, media, and the civil service, until the institutions produce Fabian outcomes without anyone having to announce a revolution. The revolution would happen – but slowly, invisibly, bureaucratically, democratically. By the time anyone noticed, the institutions would already have changed. They founded the London School of Economics in 1895 – the institution that trained generations of politicians, civil servants, economists, and journalists across the entire Commonwealth and beyond. They were instrumental in creating the Labour Party in 1900. They shaped the BBC. They designed the British welfare state. George Bernard Shaw, H.G. Wells, Tony Blair, Gordon Brown, Keir Starmer – the list of Fabians who shaped British and global politics is not a footnote. It is the history of the twentieth century’s left, stated plainly. Starmer is not an accident or an evolution of Labour. He is the current expression of a project that has been running for a hundred and forty years – patient, institutional, and entirely consistent with the original strategy. The Fabian Society is the Gramsci long march through the institutions – but English, so better dressed and better funded, and fifty years earlier. Gramsci theorized what the Fabians had already been doing. The Fabians were the practitioners. The Frankfurt School provided the philosophy. The Fabian Society provided the operational model. And the French Theory provided the cultural packaging. Three projects, different origins, identical destination: the dismantling of Western civilization’s foundations through the patient occupation of its institutions. What makes the Fabian model more dangerous than revolutionary socialism is precisely its smoothness. Revolution is visible. You can point at the barricades. The Fabian approach produces no barricades – only gradually changing curricula, subtly shifting editorial lines, incrementally revised civil service guidelines, and a succession of reasonable-sounding reforms that individually seem modest and collectively amount to the transformation of everything. The wolf in sheep’s clothing is not just a predator in disguise – it is a predator that has learned to speak the sheep’s language, adopt the sheep’s manners, express concern for the sheep’s welfare, and gradually rewrite the rules of the flock from the inside. By the time you notice, the wolf has been in the room for decades. It was wearing the sheep’s clothing so long that some people forgot it wasn’t a sheep. The deception was not incidental. It was the method. The wolf in sheep’s clothing is obłuda (👇🏻) with a long-term strategy. Zakłamanie with a hundred-year plan. The Systemic Lie with a think tank and an endowment. They were patient. They were deliberate. They were effective. And the civilization that produced Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights, and Churchill barely noticed until it was very late.