ArchLiquid

ArchLiquid’s incentivized testnet is now live on Robinhood Chain. Use the protocol, earn provisional points, and help us test the liquidity layer for onchain capital markets. Your participation may qualify you for an airdrop at TGE. Terms apply. Website: archliquid.com App: app.archliquid.com/rewards Discord: discord.gg/w4BzxQmz3W

It’s been a little while since our last update, and there’s plenty taking shape at ArchLiquid. We’re preparing a refreshed website with redesigned Markets and Launchpad pages, expanded trading charts, clearer portfolio tracking, and updated profiles, ARCH Points and ranks. The aim is a more polished, connected experience across desktop and mobile, in both light and dark modes. The new design is not live yet. We’re working through development and reviews before release. Current mainnet estimates range from a couple of weeks to a month or two, depending on testing and readiness. That’s an estimated window, rather than a confirmed launch date. Thank you for continuing to test ArchLiquid and share your feedback.

Our thesis is simple: More assets are coming onchain. Those assets need markets. Those markets need infrastructure. We're building it.

Build. Test. Find edge case. Fix edge case. Find another edge case. Infrastructure development continues as planned.

More assets moving onchain means more demand for infrastructure around those assets. Watching the evolution of tokenized markets closely. @RobinhoodApp

"We'll add liquidity later." An infrastructure strategy we cannot formally endorse.

Assets move. Capital moves. Users move. Infrastructure should be prepared to move with them. @solana is our second chain, not our last.

For teams building across multiple chains: What's been the biggest source of friction? Infrastructure, liquidity, UX or maintaining deployments? Interested to hear how others are approaching it.

There is a meaningful difference between: "We won't." and "The contract won't let us." We prefer the latter.

Tokenizing an asset is step one. Liquidity, distribution, lending and capital formation are what turn assets into functioning markets. That's where ArchLiquid fits.

Engineering update: Everything works perfectly until someone uses it. Testnet continues.

V2 made AMMs simple. V3 made liquidity more capital efficient. V4 makes liquidity increasingly programmable. Each generation expands what infrastructure can be built around it. @Uniswap

More UK founders should be building onchain. The ecosystem here is stronger than people give it credit for. Big respect to @SuperteamUK for continuing to push it forward.

Create. Launch. Lock. Vest. Stake. Lend. One infrastructure layer for onchain capital markets.

Following a comprehensive internal review, we can confirm: Removing all the liquidity is generally considered bad.

A liquidity lock proves liquidity cannot be withdrawn before a defined point. It doesn't guarantee price stability. Good infrastructure makes that distinction clear.

Non-custodial by default. Onchain by design. Verifiable by anyone.

High-throughput execution creates room for increasingly sophisticated financial infrastructure. That's one reason we're building on @solana. What part of Solana's capital markets stack still needs the most work?

Apparently "just add more liquidity" isn't a complete liquidity strategy. Noted.

Question for builders: What's currently the most unnecessarily complicated part of launching an onchain asset? We're listening.

Bringing traditional assets onchain is only the beginning. The next question is what financial infrastructure develops around them. Liquidity. Distribution. Lending. Capital formation. We're building for that next stage. @RobinhoodApp