Pinned Tweet
Buy and burn is the most overrated thing in crypto right now, and I'll die on this hill.
Here's what really happens. A project takes the trading fees, buys its own token, and burns it. You get one green candle, everyone claps, and then the chart goes back to sleep.
That money is gone forever. It didn't reach a single holder, and it didn't move anything.
That's stale liquidity. The money sits dead while the people holding the bag get nothing.
Now flip it. Share those fees with the holders instead.
If you hold, you get a cut. Some people hold more to get a bigger cut. Others take what they earned and go use it somewhere else: they ape another token, back another dev, keep the money moving.
The liquidity flows around the ecosystem instead of being set on fire.
On Solana especially, where everything is PVP and most people walk away with nothing, at least this way the people actually showing up get something back.
Is it perfect? No, nothing is. But between burning the money and sharing it with the people who hold, the choice is easy.
That's what we're building with @StayLiq. Fees go back to holders, not into a fire.
If that makes sense to you, support it. It's better for all of us, not just one chart.
Lock your bags and get rewarded
The Locker is live. 🔒
Lock your bag and earn a share of the fees from every trade on every token launched on the StayLiq launchpad. Not just STAY. Every launch.
No buy and burn. No one green candle and then the money's gone forever.
The fees go back to the people who stayed. You can use your earnings to buy more and earn more, or take them and ape something else.
Either way, the liquidity keeps moving around Solana instead of dying.
This is what we've been building toward.
Lock in at stayliq.fun/lock
Why fee sharing, not buy and burn
Burning feels good for a day, then it's gone. Tokens get torched, the chart gets a small bump, and nothing really changes.
Building StayLiq with full fee sharing instead, so the fees go back into the market and keep the LP flowing for as long as people trade.
Third DNS hijack this week. Vercel, Name.com, now Netlify.
None of these teams got their contracts hacked. Someone took the domain, pointed it at a fake site, and the fake site asked people to sign.
If you run a dapp, do the boring stuff today:
- turn on the registrar's transfer lock
- add CAA records so only your chosen companies can issue certs for your domain
- use 2FA with a passkey or hardware key on every login that can touch DNS
- switch on DNSSEC
- set up a watcher that pings you if your DNS or site files change
The domain is the front door, and almost nobody checks it.
If a site you've used for months suddenly asks you to sign something new, close the tab.
Pump still pulls about 78% of Solana launchpad revenue.
Most new pads are fighting it on fees. I don't think fees are why coins die.
Liquidity leaving after launch is. That's what I'm working on…
Rough math from DefiLlama's Solana launchpad revenue, last 30 days: Pump ~$44M of ~$57M.
defillama.com/protocols/laun…
Right now creators get paid best for leaving and worst for staying.
Flipping that is the whole idea.
Heads down on it.
Block 0 is the best seat in any launch, and most traders never get near it.
Been testing what happens when it stops being the best seat.
Devnet is getting interesting…
Robinhood launched a chain. A lot of people will just copy the same old crypto apps onto it.
Some teams are already past that. You can already swap stock tokens. You can already lend and borrow against them.
The part that still feels empty to me is everything that is not a swap or a loan. A stock token in a game. A bot that can hold NVDA without a brokerage screen. Stuff the Robinhood app still cannot do.
