A lot of companies are still using AI as an extra tool inside the same old workflows.
There’s probably more upside in changing how the work gets done than in waiting for the next model.
Even if AI development stopped today, we'd have years of catching up to do. The gap between what current models can do and what almost anyone is using them for is vast.
Here’s my post on The Overhang, and the four advantages that let people close it. open.substack.com/pub/oneuse…
4
hours pay next month. a contingency case pays once, at the end, and only if it wins
that gap is the real moat in plaintiff work and it has nothing to do with models
I highly recommend Bob Ambrogi’s report on ILTACON
Have we reached peak legal tech? Here's my take on @ILTAConf, the largest one ever, and with over-the-top booths and parties from the likes of @harvey and @WeAreLegora, including performances from big-name artists such as Sheryl Crow and Lady A. lawnext.com/2026/08/have-we-…
1
83
Welcome to the Club, Google
With Gemini Enterprise for Legal, Google joins a slew of other Big Tech companies building specialized tools for legal industry professionals. law.com/legaltechnews/2026/0…
1
52
34% of law firm professionals use ai tools their own firm never authorised. unauthorised means nobody checks the output
there's a database of 1,923 court decisions where invented citations reached a judge anyway. 761 filed by lawyers. 28 written by the judge
damiencharlotin.com/hallucin…
1
38






