Pinned Tweet
End all Vaccine Mandates
Barbara O’Neill says it wasn’t vaccines that ended infectious diseases — it was sanitation, hygiene and nutrition.
“They used to have in the medical journals the graphs of infectious diseases.”
“And if you look at the original graphs, the infectious diseases were three-quarters,
sometimes totally wiped out before the vaccines were introduced.”
“So what caused this massive drop?”
“Florence Nightingale… she increased hygiene, sanitation and nutrition.”
“In the 1950s, the sewage from London went into the Thames and the people in London drank that water… no wonder the infectious diseases were out of control.”
“The children aren’t sitting in sewage anymore… that’s what stopped those diseases.”
bannk88 retweeted
🚨Uncovered video🚨
@BernieSanders in 1985 praising the Communist Castro regime in Cuba and admitting on camera that he traveled to Nicaragua to advise the Ortega regime on how to successfully fight the United States.
bannk88 retweeted
President Bukele single-handedly proved that the UN and their NGO’s were enabling the criminal activities of Haitian Gangs who committed murder, money laundering, human trafficking and extortion.
bannk88 retweeted
Every Republican legislature in America should immediately pass legislation to:
1) Ban sanctuary cities
2) Ban Ranked Choice Voting
3) Ban ballot harvesting
4) Require citizenship to vote
5) Require photo ID to vote
6) Ban the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
7) Ban foreign entities from buying property
8) Suspend any gas taxes
9) Institute school choice
10) Abolish property taxes
11) Open non-juror records to public inspection
12) Mandate secretaries of state to share complete voter registration rolls with DOJ
13) Mandate voter roll list maintenance
14) Offer rewards for convictions involving fraudulent use of Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, Social Security, or other entitlements
15) Freeze rent increases
Republican governors would be wise to use this time to convene special sessions.
bannk88 retweeted
Pol Pot. This piece of shit killed an estimated 1.7 million Cambodians between 1975 and 1979, somewhere between 25 and 33 percent of the entire population. He did this by applying an ideology to its logical conclusion. Ideology always has a conclusion; socialism's conclusion is death.
The Khmer Rouge abolished money in 1975. Completely. Banks closed. Markets dissolved. Currency became contraband. They then abolished private property, forcibly relocated urban populations to collective farms, and set central planners the task of organizing rice production for the entire nation. The result was predictable: mass starvation beside the rice fields. Planners cannot coordinate production without prices. Prices require private property and voluntary exchange.
Pol Pot studied in Paris during the 1950s, absorbing French Communist Party doctrine and Maoist agrarianism. Western universities provided the intellectual scaffolding for the killing fields. Coercion requires enforcers, tribunals, and eventually mass graves; Cambodia's are at Choeung Ek.
Every collectivist experiment reaches this same point, because central planners cannot solve what free exchange solves automatically every second of every day.
bannk88 retweeted
This is INSANE 🚨 Mike Benz does through Jeffrey Epstein documents
“Jeffrey Epstein negotiated the f*cking contract to move the CIA’s proprietary airliner, Southern Air Transport, which was busted running drugs and guns during Iran-Contra”
“He (Epstein) personally was the authorized signatory on the deal with Southern Air Transport to move it to a military base in Columbus, Ohio, to service the Limited
Hey, any of you guys got any bright ideas about how you would go about in 1994, convincing the Central Intelligence Agency to move its proprietary CIA airline used for covert operations, based in Miami, to f*cking up and move its entire operation to f*cking Columbus, Ohio, just to service your personal company instead of the CIA?
What do you think he cold called the CIA? You think he just schmoozed the CIA? Or is it because he was handling Khashoggi’s money during Iran-Contra that purchased the guns that Southern Air Transport a decade earlier was moving?
Adnan Khashoggi is the notorious Saudi Arabian billionaire arms dealer and international middleman. He was one of the world’s most prominent arms brokers in the 1970s and 1980s, facilitating massive deals between Western defense contractors (like Lockheed and Northrop) and the Saudi government, earning billions in commissions.
Jeffrey Epstein was so deeply involved in our government and international affairs
Toxic skies is real.
The ROTHSCHILDS have just begun to lose control of the weather.
For 47 years, they have controlled the skies through a network of 22 weather modification stations that could direct hurricanes, droughts, floods, and earthquakes, on demand, to any place on Earth.
The program was called "THRONE CLIMATE" and was funded by a labyrinth of NGOs, carbon credit systems, and "green energy" foundations, all connected to the same family office in Geneva that has controlled European banks since 1815. A few days ago, the last station was disconnected, seized in a military operation involving 6 nations that have never publicly acknowledged working together. The weather is no longer a weapon. For the first time since 1979, the skies belong to no one. Every "natural disaster" of the last 47 years had a signature, a digital fingerprint embedded in the ionosphere that preceded it. HAARP researchers have detected it for decades. They were ridiculed, but they were right about everything: Hurricane Katrina: frequency trace detected 72 hours before impact; The 2010 Haiti earthquake has the same frequency signature, originating from a station in Venezuela; The 2011 earthquake, signature attributed to a flagless ship operating in the Pacific. The ship's registration, obtained via "QFS maritime tracking," belongs to a company conveniently located in the Cayman Islands. The company's sole director: a family trust of the Rothschild family.
They didn't predict disasters, they ordered them. Why control the weather? Because the weather controls everything. Food prices, insurance markets, government stability, migration systems, election outcomes. They didn't need an army. They didn't need murders. They needed rain or drought in the right place at the right time. $4.2 trillion in "natural disaster" damages since 1979. Betting on the destruction they created. Harvesting the suffering they caused. For the first time in half a century, the rain will fall where it should fall.
FOLLOW ME, THE NEXT DROP WILL BE SHOCKING
There needs to be justice for Sabatini.
🚨 “I LOST EVERYTHING.” — PROFESSOR DAVID M. SABATINI RECOUNTS THE DEVASTATING DESTRUCTION OF HIS SCIENTIFIC CAREER AND PROFESSIONAL LIFE.
FROM A WORLD-RENOWNED SCIENTIST AND POTENTIAL NOBEL PRIZE CONTENDER TO YEARS OF PROFESSIONAL, FINANCIAL, AND PERSONAL DEVASTATION.
> Become one of the world's leading biomedical scientists.
> Make pioneering discoveries concerning the mTOR signaling pathway, transforming our understanding of cell growth, metabolism, and disease.
> Build an internationally recognized laboratory and research program.
> Become an HHMI Investigator.
> Receive the prestigious 2020 Sjöberg Prize.
> Be widely regarded as a potential future Nobel Prize contender.
> Have a consensual relationship with fellow MIT scientist Kristin Knouse.
> Face allegations of sexual misconduct and an institutional investigation.
> August 2021: Lose his position at the Whitehead Institute.
> Lose his Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI) Investigator appointment.
> Lose his principal source of research funding through HHMI.
> Lose his income, which he testified fell to ZERO within hours.
> Lose his laboratory and the institutional infrastructure supporting his research.
> Lose all his positions at biotechnology companies he helped establish.
> Lose his positions on biotechnology companies' scientific advisory boards.
> Lose prospective company shares and equity compensation.
> Lose more than 2 MILLION company shares, according to evidence presented by his legal team.
> Lose every position he held on scientific journals' editorial boards.
> Lose control over manuscripts being prepared by his research group.
> Lose direct communication with journal editors concerning those manuscripts.
> Have his institutional affiliations removed from scientific manuscripts, leaving his name without institutional contact information.
> 2022: Lose his tenured faculty position at MIT.
> Lose the opportunity for a potential appointment at New York University (NYU).
> Lose access to established research funding opportunities.
> Lose scientific collaborations and professional opportunities.
> Lose speaking invitations and opportunities to participate in the scientific community.
> Suffer an estimated $1.9 MILLION in lost income between 2021 and 2025, according to his legal team.
> Experience years of reputational destruction and professional isolation.
> Struggle to obtain employment despite his scientific accomplishments.
> Endure public humiliation, including an incident in which a fellow airline passenger reportedly requested to be moved after recognizing him.
> Endure profound personal suffering, including a suicide attempt he subsequently described publicly.
> Fight for years through the courts to obtain accountability.
> October 2026: A Massachusetts jury finds Kristin Knouse liable for defamation and tortious interference, awarding Sabatini $6 MILLION in damages.
🚨 BUT A JURY VERDICT CANNOT RESTORE EVERYTHING HE LOST.
His scientific positions. His research funding. His biotechnology interests. His editorial appointments. His manuscripts. His professional reputation. Years of his scientific career.
THE HUMAN SUFFERING AND LOST SCIENTIFIC OPPORTUNITIES EXTEND FAR BEYOND ANY FINANCIAL AWARD.
🚨 AND THE QUESTION OF INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY REMAINS UNRESOLVED.
Court evidence raises serious concerns about the decisions and conduct of Ruth Lehmann (@REMLehmann), Director and President of the @WhiteheadInst.
🔴 OCTOBER 2020: Kristin Knouse's private messages describe Lehmann as apparently contemplating Sabatini's dismissal months before the formal investigation began. The messages also refer to the importance of his “public outing” and the proposition that “noone is too successful to be taken down.”
🔴 DECEMBER 2020–AUGUST 2021: Court evidence includes private messages describing the diversity survey as a “cover up” for an investigation already being contemplated. The communications raise serious questions about the origins and transparency of Whitehead's investigative process.
🔴 MARCH 2021: Court evidence establishes that Lehmann received and acknowledged serious complaints describing investigators as “incredibly accusatory, aggressive” and “asking leading questions.”
🔴 AUGUST 2021: Testimony cited in Sabatini's court submissions raises the serious concern that Lehmann had decided to terminate Sabatini before receiving the investigators' final report, calling into question whether the outcome had been predetermined.
🔴 AUGUST–SEPTEMBER 2021: Communications between Lehmann and senior MIT leadership raise questions about institutional alignment and the independence of subsequent decisions.
🔴 SEPTEMBER–OCTOBER 2021: Additional court messages reveal discussions involving @MIT Professor Sangeeta Bhatia (@snbhatia) concerning the selection of MIT's tenure-review committee and possible pressure on MIT leadership, raising further questions about the independence of the process.
THESE DOCUMENTED CONCERNS DEMAND A FULL, INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTING OF THE ROLE OF WHITEHEAD'S LEADERSHIP IN THE DECISIONS THAT CONTRIBUTED TO SABATINI'S PROFESSIONAL LOSSES.
🚨 THE WHITEHEAD INSTITUTE BOARD MUST ACT.
A PUBLIC EXPLANATION, AN APPROPRIATE APOLOGY, AND FULL INSTITUTIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY ARE THE MINIMUM.
WHERE SERIOUS LEADERSHIP FAILURES ARE ESTABLISHED, RESIGNATION MUST FOLLOW.
🎥 WATCH PROFESSOR @DMSabatini DESCRIBE WHAT HE LOST IN HIS OWN WORDS.
🔱 ScienceGuardians™ Legal and Investigative Team
THE DEMAND FOR ACCOUNTABILITY IS GROWING. THE SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY DESERVES ANSWERS. STAY TUNED. ⚠️
@SciGuardians 🔱
bannk88 retweeted
You can NOT make this up…
The Gates Foundation funded the development of CARBON NANODOTS in 2016… and just 2 years later scientists discovered strikingly similar CARBON NANODOTS inside Coca-Cola and Pepsi.
BOTH:
- Measured ~5 nanometers
- Contained GRAPHENE-LIKE carbon structures
- Displayed fluorescence
- Possessed oxygen-containing surface groups
And it gets even crazier… the Gates Foundation is HEAVILY invested in the world's largest Coca-Cola bottler ($660 MILLION in 2026).
While carbon nanodots can form naturally when sugars are heated, the exact origin of the particles detected in Coca-Cola and Pepsi was never established.
I do recall. All of it for 6 decades of betrayal.
THEY RAN THE LARGEST PSYCHOLOGICAL CAMPAIGN IN HISTORY ON THEIR OWN CITIZENS.
Then they wrote it down. SPI-B, 22 March 2020: "The perceived level of personal threat needs to be increased among those who are complacent, using hard-hitting emotional messaging."
174 times on the record: I don't recall.
They will try it again.
I DON'T RECALL — out now. Dedicated to Anthony Fauci and everyone who took part.
Option B, please.
In the next ten years, humanity will make one choice that decides the next thousand.
Option A: an Orwellian world run by a tiny hyperclass that controls AI, owns every resource, and turns the rest of us into permanent dependents.
Option B: for the first time in history, a world where the systemic corruption that has ruled us for decades simply stops being possible.
Yesterday I wrote that Milei and Bukele exposed the empire of lies. Javier Milei reposted it. Today I want to explain why that post was only the beginning, and why I've never been more optimistic.
If you're on the left, or even the far left, read this one to the end. I'm not trying to convert you. The stakes are your future too.
Start from first principles. A system produces exactly what it rewards.
For decades, the Western system has been captured by one worldview: administrations, universities, NGOs, media, international institutions. The left didn't win the argument. It won the hiring committees.
Once a system is captured, its incentives flip.
You don't get promoted for solving problems. You get promoted for managing them. A solved problem kills a budget line. A managed problem renews it every year.
You don't succeed by telling the truth. You succeed by saying the right words. So hypocrisy becomes a career skill. The professor who preaches equality and runs the most closed network in the country. The politician who votes for open borders and lives where none of it ever reaches him.
You don't build fair systems. You build systems that look fair and quietly pay the people who run them. Inflation is a tax on the poor that funds the state. Programs fund the consultants who design more programs.
That's what "systemic" means. Nobody has to be evil. Honest people inside the machine either adapt or leave. After forty years, the ones still there are the ones who adapted.
Here's the irony. The first countries to break free were the ones at the very bottom.
Argentina was bankrupt. El Salvador was a graveyard. The system had nothing left to promise them, and that's exactly why they woke up. When the lie stops paying, people stop believing it.
No civilization is dead as long as its people can still see the problem clearly. Rock bottom is often where the rebound starts.
Now the West is caught in a vise.
On one side, AI. A technology that exposes managed incompetence. When a model can read a 2,000-page law, audit a national budget and compare outcomes across 50 countries in seconds, "it's complicated" stops working. The expert class loses its monopoly on knowledge.
On the other side, a generation of tech builders who think from first principles and don't owe their careers to the system. They have more capital, more talent and more reach than most countries. And they've seen up close how the machine works.
Put the two together and the old system is close to checkmate. It can't compete on results. It can't hide behind complexity. It can't control the narrative anymore.
So what does a system do when it can't win? It tries to own the thing that's beating it.
Listen to Marc Andreessen. He has said publicly that in 2024 he sat with Biden administration officials who told him AI would be two or three big companies working hand in hand with the government, that investors shouldn't even bother funding AI startups, and that parts of the underlying math could be classified the way nuclear physics was in the Cold War. He walked out and endorsed Trump. Former Biden officials now say that's not what was said. Read both versions and decide who you believe.
The logic doesn't depend on one lunch, though. Control three companies and you control the models. Control the models and you control what billions of people read, ask, learn and are allowed to say. Add a digital ID, a programmable currency and the scanning of private messages that Europe keeps putting back on the table. Then you don't need a Ministry of Truth anymore. A compliance department is enough.
1984 with a better UX.
And last Tuesday, Democrats took back Congress. This isn't theoretical anymore. The keys to the house are on the table.
Now imagine we don't hand them over.
Intelligence becomes almost free. Expertise stops being a privilege. A kid in a village in Brittany or a suburb of Lagos gets the same doctor, the same lawyer, the same tutor as a billionaire's son. The cost of producing almost everything collapses. And systemic corruption becomes nearly impossible, because anyone can audit every budget, every law and every promise, instantly.
For the first time in human history, a society that could be truly equal. The old left version was equality by sharing scarcity. This one is equality through abundance. A world where poverty stops being a law of nature.
Which is exactly what the left always said it wanted.
So to my friends on the left, one honest question. Which side actually leads there? The side that wants AI open, cheap and in everyone's hands? Or the side that wants it locked inside three companies and a regulator?
Milei and Bukele proved the impossible was possible at the scale of a country. AI is offering the same thing at the scale of civilization.
All we have to do is not give the keys to the people who were paid to keep the problem alive.
That's the choice. And I've never been more optimistic, because for the first time, we can all see it.
bannk88 retweeted
🚨 HOLY CRAP! Nick Shirley personally confirmed that NGOs were given HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of dollars to traffic children across the border and across America — and a lot of the firms have been DISSOLVED
"They don't even EXIST anymore!" 🤯
"NOBODY knows where these kids went!"
"The government would send money to NGOs, doing the dirty work for the government and who knows what was taking place...They don't even exist anymore. They received literally hundreds of millions of dollars."
@nickshirleyy says one NGO took in $895 million, and others got more than $100 million each
Becerra ran HHS through all of it, and now he's becoming Governor of California. HORRENDOUS.
Cartel funded and selected.
🔴 #TEXAS: La nueva gobernadora Gina Hinojosa es originaria del estado narcotraficante de SLP, concretamente de Tamazunchale, una zona en extremo marginada por Morena y gobiernos anteriores, dominada por grupos criminales como el CJNG, Cártel del Golfo, Cártel del Noreste, Cártel de Sinaloa y Cártel Los Alemanes junto con el gobernador Pollo Gallardo.
Puede ser que los grupos terroristas de la droga mexicanos ahora han financiado a los demócratas por la guerra declarada por el Presidente Donald Trump en su contra y han impuesto a una gobernadora de origen mexicano de un estado criminal San Luis Potosí, donde domina el terror, bajo el gobierno de Morena.
La narcotraficante y adicta presidente de México, Claudia Sheinbaum elogió a Gina Hinojosa, lo que ya habla muy mal de la nueva gobernadora, ser felicitada por una política criminal financiada por el Cártel de Sinaloa, defensora total de los narco laboratorios y del Mayo Zamabada, Sheinbaum dice que el Mayo no debió ser detenido y que su detención fue Traición a la Patria.
Gina Hinojosa y Xavier Becerra, gobernador electo de California, son de origen mexicano.
Sheinbaum declaró: “Ambos tienen padres nacidos en México y mantienen un vínculo, tanto con sus estados como con los mexicanos”, sostuvo.
En ese contexto, Sheinbaum se mostró contenta por el reconocimiento de la comunidad mexicano-estadounidense en las elecciones del 3 de noviembre. “Nos da mucho gusto”, expresó.
Hinojosa venció al actual gobernador, Greg Abbott, con el 52,8% de los votos, según AP. Con este triunfo, se convirtió en la primera mujer de origen latino en asumir la gobernación de Texas. Asimismo, es la segunda demócrata en ocupar el cargo, antecedida por Ann Richards (1991-1995).
“Lo logramos”, dijo en su primer discurso como gobernadora electa. “Todo es más grande en Texas, incluso la sorpresa de esta victoria. Esta noche impresionamos al mundo y demostramos que todo es posible”.
La conclusión de esto es muy negativa, yo como mexicano lo condeno, y creo que los estadounidenses tienen derecho a molestarse con los hispanos que votaron por Gina, porque si van a ser funcionarios de Estados Unidos no tienen porque elogiar a un país narcotraficante que no les dio nada como México. Sino, mejor hubieran sido gobernadores de un estado mexicano.
Recuérdese que sino fuera porque Tamazunchale es un municipio miserable no se hubieran ido a los Estados Unidos, es un gesto de MALAGRADECIDOS ocupar un cargo en Estados Unidos con la única intención de servir a un estado fracasado y terrorista como México.
Gina es una mala persona, porque si es de origen mexicano no me representa, ¿Cómo nos va representar una mujer que apoya un partido gay, abortista, transexual e islámico? Gina es delincuente, no me queda duda.
bannk88 retweeted
Restore USA Caucus will be offering a weekend Civil Rights Training Course to explain how to research, write and file a Pro Se Lawsuit to enforce your constitutional rights.
Please share so we can help 1,000s of Americans come together for peaceful and legal mass deportations.
bannk88 retweeted
The thought police are coming for criticism of Islam in New Jersey. Fresh off their big election victories in NJ, Democrats here just introduced Assembly Bill A1146, which creates a sweeping new state definition of “Islamophobia”. And it could land you in jail.
Under the bill, “claims of a demographic threat posed by Muslims or of a Muslim takeover” are listed as examples of Islamophobia.
So is “hostility and fear of Islam.” Pointing out that the Muslim population is growing (Pew projects it roughly doubling by 2050) or that classical Islamic doctrine calls for Muslim political supremacy over non-Muslims can now be treated as evidence of discriminatory intent.
Bring up that many women are required to cover their hair and bodies? (Quran 24:31, 33:59) That can be framed as hostility toward Muslim culture.
Point out that Muhammad married a six-year-old and consummated the marriage at nine? (Sahih Bukhari 3894, Sahih Muslim 1422) Stereotypical allegation.
Cite the Quranic verses condemning homosexuality? (7:80-81 and related Lot passages) Rhetorical anti-Muslim manifestation.
Mention that Jews and Christians were required to submit and pay the jizya tax? (Quran 9:29) Dehumanizing claim about Muslims as a group.
The bill gives the state a broad new tool to treat factual criticism of Islamic texts, history, and demographics as proof of Islamophobic motive in existing discrimination cases, workplace investigations, schools, and bias-enhancement decisions.
This is how it all starts.
Prepare yourself for the same path the UK already took where Grandpas have been getting dragged out of their homes for social media posts.
The global replacement agenda in full swing paid by taxpayers.
Manhattan Borough President Brad Hoylman-Sigal announces the opening of a new ‘Immigrant Welcome Center ‘ in New York
Here foreigners can come signup for “free legal assistance, healthcare benefit assistance” housing, EBT Food Stamps and more
Paid for by taxpayers. American Taxpayers get nothing, foreigners get everything for free. This should make you furious.
They are literally just giving our money away to people who shouldn’t even be here. They are funding your replacements
Democrats talk about Americans not being able to afford healthcare then go force Americans to pay for foreigners to have free healthcare… which also drives up costs for all of us so it’s like we pay twice. Once with higher taxes and again with higher healthcare costs
Listen to moms. They know better than any corrupt politician or the medical criminal enterprise.
I watched all 138 minutes of Joe Rogan's interview with @calleymeans. Calley's logic is as follows (my comments are in parentheses):
1. President Trump and RFK Jr. are heroes, the best people on the planet.
2. They keep getting bamboozled by staffers who know the system better, are secretly working for industry, and are demons.
3. Trump and RFK Jr. are completely unaware of these machinations by staffers (in spite of the fact that the details are in the news every day and activists are explaining to them exactly what is going on).
4. When Trump and RFK Jr. find out after the fact that they have been betrayed they are furious (and then do nothing).
(At no point does Joe Rogan ever ask why these betrayals are not met with firings of the people involved.)
5. Trump and RFK Jr. care deeply about these issues but this pattern just keeps happening because this is a structural problem and there is nothing Trump and RFK Jr. can do so we'll just have to pass a Constitutional amendment some day to address the problem of lobbyists. (The details of this proposed Constitutional amendment are never described.)
That's the interview. 2 hours and 18 minutes of this logic over and over again.
Heidi Overton! Plots with the DOJ to get the Supreme Court to take the glyphosate case! Writes the Executive Order to protect Bayer/Monsanto! Trump and RFK Jr. didn't know! Her punishment? Nominated to be the head of the FDA.
What!???
And that's how you know the interview is a psyop.
In point of fact, Trump or RFK Jr. could pull the Covid shots tomorrow. Trump or RFK Jr. could have stopped the approval of the Moderna mRNA flu shot or flavored vapes but refused to use their legal authority to do so. Both men know EXACTLY what is happening but they do nothing because THEY are captured by industry.
The Informed Consent Action Network even sent a letter to @SecKennedy back in June listing twenty things he could do with the stroke of a pen (no Congressional approval or committee meetings necessary) to reform the vaccine program to make it safer and none of those reforms have happened.
icandecide.org/wp-content/up…
Meanwhile the White House, HHS, and MAHA tell the base to shut up so that industry can continue to get away with murder and the money will keep rolling in.
I'm sick of the lies. I'm sick of the fact that the government is engaged in iatrogenocide and Calley Means thinks that the problem is soda pop. I'm sick of the endless psyops that keep the killing on schedule and the profits thick. I'm sick of pretenders who have not done the work. I'm sick of fake heroes who refuse to use their power to protect the citizenry.
Listen to the moms. Pull the shots. Shut down these vile agencies. We don't need a Constitutional amendment. Everything necessary to stop the chronic disease epidemics can be done right now by President Trump and Secretary Kennedy with the powers that they already have. No more excuses.
bannk88 retweeted
DATA REPUBLICAN: DROP 13 “DEMOCRACY FILES / THE NEW FOUNDING / POLICYLINK CONNECTION!
Congress has historically set the Court’s size, and that expansion along with reforms to the nomination and confirmation process.
The October 2026, “We the People: Lessons from the Unsung Re-Founders of Our Nation” symposium in Baltimore was co-hosted by the 14th Amendment Center for Law and Democracy at Howard University School of Law and the Gibson-Banks Center for Race and the Law at the University of Maryland Francis King Carey School of Law.
The event focused on celebrating lesser-known contributors to the post-Civil War re-founding of American democracy and exploring pathways to a more just multiracial democracy.
Specific external funders or sponsors for the symposium itself are not listed in public materials; the event was supported through the host institutions.
The 14th Amendment Center, which co-hosted, received a $1.5 million, three-year grant from the David and Lucile Packard Foundation in 2025 to support its work on equal protection, due process, and related democratic reforms.
The Packard Foundation has also supported PolicyLink’s related efforts and has highlighted connections between the organizations’ work on the Fourteenth Amendment.
The panel “The Making of a Third Founding: Looking Ahead to the Next Re-Founding,” moderated by Chaz Arnett of the University of Maryland School of Law, featured several participants who outlined elements of a third founding. Dorothy A. Brown, the Martin D. Ginsburg Chair in Taxation and a professor at Georgetown University Law Center, discussed reparations, including a “cash plus” approach that pairs direct payments with systemic tax and wealth-creation reforms.
Nicole D. Porter, advocacy director at The Sentencing Project, addressed criminal legal system changes, including ending felony disenfranchisement and restoring voting rights.
Deuel Ross, litigation director at the NAACP Legal Defense Fund, examined voting rights protections and the implications of cases such as Louisiana v. Callais for majority-minority districts. LaTosha Brown, co-founder of Black Voters Matter, emphasized shifting from “we the people” language toward “we the power” through grassroots mobilization.
Sherrilyn Ifill, founding director of the 14th Amendment Center and Democracy spoke about rethinking the Supreme Court, including the argument that the number nine is “not talismanic,” that Congress has historically set the Court’s size, and that expansion along with reforms to the nomination and confirmation process would help address legitimacy and capacity issues.
A related but separate event, the 14th Amendment Center’s second annual symposium held in April 2026 at Howard University School of Law (“That the Work This Time Shall Finally Be Done: The 14th Amendment and the Next Refounding”), included remarks by U.S. Representative Jamie Raskin of Maryland, ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee.
Raskin, a good friend of Professor Sherrilyn Ifill, stated that every component of the 14th Amendment, beginning with birthright citizenship, due process, and equal protection, is under attack.
These gatherings form part of the Center’s ongoing series of convenings examining the 14th Amendment as a foundation for democratic renewal.
In a further connection, Sherrilyn Ifill spoke at the 2026 PolicyLink Summit titled “We Are The Founders: Writing the Unfinished Story of Our Democracy.”
PolicyLink posted her full talk on its YouTube channel under the title “PolicyLink Summit: Sherrilyn Ifill on the 14th Amendment and a lineage of founders.”
PolicyLink’s “Governing for All” agenda is explicitly grounded in the Fourteenth Amendment and prominently features Ifill and the Center’s work.
Both the 14th Amendment Center and PolicyLink have received support from the Packard Foundation, which has highlighted the connection between their Fourteenth Amendment efforts.
bannk88 retweeted
xitter.gq/DataRepublican/status/…
I was shaken to my core last night after reviewing this video. Why?
Because I understand the leftist radicals masterplan at the strategic level. I understand their vision.
The radical left coalition coordinated a high level strategic plan with tactical implementation at the grassroots level. The NGOs formulated a unifying message and provided massive funding down to the ground level. They translated the long term why into short term actionable hows.
The NGO framework is the backbone of the strategic plan, the unified messaging, and the grassroots organizing is the tactical implementation of their long-term vision.
The Law School Deans, the unions, the educational system, and the NGOs are the ones that indoctrinate the youth to hate our current constitutional framework. The message is that it is broken and that it must be reformed.
Instead of attempting to overthrow the government through direct conflict, the organizers introduce an alternative pathway: reinterpreting or amending the foundational law of the land.
The alternative pathway relies on reinterpreting the Constitution as an inherently majoritarian document or forcing a constitutional convention.
By arguing that the "will of the people" should immediately overwrite existing checks and balances, electoral colleges, and judicial reviews, they establish a justification to dismantle representative institutions in favor of direct majority rule.
Once direct democracy gains momentum in local or state ballot initiatives, it creates a cascading effect.
The public appetite for bypassing representatives grows, rapidly neutralizing traditional governing bodies and accelerating the transition toward a system where 51% of the population holds absolute, direct control over all national policy.
Prior to the midterms, 18 states and Washington, D.C. had already signed the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC)into law, securing 222 electoral votes. This left the initiative exactly 48 electoral votes short of the 270 needed for activation.
In the November 2026 midterm elections, Democratic candidates secured trifectas, meaning they won the governor’s mansion and majorities in both legislative chambers, in five key states that have not yet joined the compact: Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, and Arizona.
If the governors and lawmakers in these newly flipped states choose to prioritize the NPVIC, they will bypass the traditional constitutional amendment process by utilizing Article II, Section 1 of the U.S. Constitution.
This clause gives state legislatures the absolute power to choose how they allocate their electors. Rather than using the traditional winner-take-all method based on state-level totals, the new state laws would mandate that their electors align with the national popular count.
If the newly elected governors and legislatures move to pass the compact and push it over the 270-vote threshold, opponents have several distinct legal pathways to challenge and block its implementation.
The Compact Clause Violation: Article I, Section 10 states that "No State shall, without the Consent of Congress... enter into any Agreement or Compact with another State."
Because the NPVIC shifts political power away from non-participating states, it fundamentally requires congressional consent to be valid. Without it, the compact is an illegal political cartel.
If the Democratic Party holds a trifecta in Washington (President, House, and Senate) alongside a majority of Democratic governors leading into the 2028 presidential election, Congressional Intervention is likely.
Rather than just approving the compact, a unified Democratic federal government could use Article I, Section 4 (The Elections Clause), which gives Congress the ultimate authority to alter the "Times, Places and Manner" of holding federal elections.
Congress could pass sweeping federal legislation that standardizes how states must report their popular vote totals, legally locking the multi-state pooling system into federal statute and making it much harder for individual red states to sue to disrupt the count.
The core argument for building a strong conservative framework leading up to the 2028 election is simple.
It is vastly easier to defeat an unconstitutional system at the ballot box than it is to dismantle it in a courtroom once it has been codified.
Winning the presidency and expanding the Republican governorships map in 2028 ensures that the mechanisms used to force the National Popular Vote Compact can be dismantled legislatively and executively, preserving the federalist system envisioned by the Framers without risking it all on a single judicial ruling.
I very rarely get shaken to my core.
But I did last night based on my extensive understanding of the overall strategic plan of the radical leftist organizations including numerous Deans of Law Schools.
Because they have built a formidable base, the radical left organizations will continue to build on the "unifying message" moving forward: their messaging will be to push alternatives to our Constitution, Supreme Court, the Electoral College, and more.
They are openly telling you the plan. All you need to do is listen.
More drops to come later today. Stay tuned.
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 16: HOW THE MIDTERMS WERE PULLED OFF 🚨
Among today's talk of voter fraud, a critical role is overlooked: the importance of NGOs in early voting.
Below, I show the receipts where NGOs directly take a role in making the midterms happen.
It's been a long week, and I'm too tired to type up a summary.
Just know the two main points:
Republicans have an institutional blindness. They believe getting voters is all about branding and messaging. They pay enormous sums to consultants and TV ads and have endless conferences on what the right "message" is.
Democrats, meanwhile, have built an entire and expensive institutional machinery around getting people physically to the polls. And they were more motivated in 2026 than any other year.
I do NOT deny the existence of voter fraud. Saying the data doesn't show that others claim to show, is not equivalent to saying there is no fraud.
As I've said in several posts today, the election system in the United States is structurally set up such that citizenship verification is an honor system. The biggest swings in 2026 were among young people and Hispanics.
And 2026 was a concerted effort by NGOs like none other. Watch them in their own words how they pulled it off:
bannk88 retweeted
🚨🚨 THE DEMOCRACY FILES / ILLEGITIMACY PLAYBOOK, PART 16: HOW THE MIDTERMS WERE PULLED OFF 🚨
Among today's talk of voter fraud, a critical role is overlooked: the importance of NGOs in early voting.
Below, I show the receipts where NGOs directly take a role in making the midterms happen.
It's been a long week, and I'm too tired to type up a summary.
Just know the two main points:
Republicans have an institutional blindness. They believe getting voters is all about branding and messaging. They pay enormous sums to consultants and TV ads and have endless conferences on what the right "message" is.
Democrats, meanwhile, have built an entire and expensive institutional machinery around getting people physically to the polls. And they were more motivated in 2026 than any other year.
I do NOT deny the existence of voter fraud. Saying the data doesn't show that others claim to show, is not equivalent to saying there is no fraud.
As I've said in several posts today, the election system in the United States is structurally set up such that citizenship verification is an honor system. The biggest swings in 2026 were among young people and Hispanics.
And 2026 was a concerted effort by NGOs like none other. Watch them in their own words how they pulled it off:
Dear @elonmusk
Dear Elon Musk @elonmusk,
Three days ago, Block, the parent of Cash App, agreed to pay roughly $764 million to the Department of Justice for failing to stop money laundering on a product that looks a lot like X Money. Regulators found Cash App’s backlog of unreviewed suspicious activity alerts went from 18,000 to 169,000 in two years. The product grew faster than the people watching it.
I am writing because I believe the same thing is about to happen to you, and I would rather say so now than read about it later.
My name is Everett Stern. I am the HSBC whistleblower. In 2010 I was a compliance officer who found money moving through the bank for drug cartels, terror financiers, and sanctioned regimes. I documented it. I escalated it. I was told to stop. So I took it to the United States government, the way every citizen is told to. The bank paid $1.9 billion. Nobody went to jail. And I lost everything. My career ended. I was blacklisted from the industry I had tried to protect. I slept on a cot in an apartment with cockroaches and waited tables at @PFChangs to survive. I risked my life, and for a long time I was not sure it had been worth it. I rebuilt from nothing, and I decided the rest of my life would be spent preventing the next HSBC.
Last month Bank of America admitted to willfully violating the Bank Secrecy Act. More than $5 billion in suspicious transactions went unreported. 475 sanctions violations touching Russia, Iran, and global terrorism programs. The bank paid $1.2 billion, about two weeks of its profit, and not one person was charged. I wrote an open letter to Secretary Bessent asking him to refer the people responsible for criminal prosecution. 3.7 million Americans read it. Republicans and Democrats stood behind it. The Secretary never answered. No banker is going to jail.
Here is the problem we are facing, in plain terms. Every terrorist attack starts with a wire transfer. Every drug death in America starts with a cartel being able to move its money. The banks know it, pay their fines, and keep going. The government knows it and takes no real action. Fourteen years after HSBC, nothing has changed, and people are dying because of it.
But you can change it. You can on your own platform, from the first day, before the first alert backlog ever forms. The banks will not do it. Treasury has not done it. You could be the first person with the power to build it right who actually did.
I have the highest respect for you and what you have built. I know you have no interest in supporting terrorists or drug cartels. But I have spent fourteen years watching how they work, and they are already reading your website. It promises to “pay anyone on X, free and with no limits,” a Visa card with worldwide ATM fee reimbursements, no foreign transaction fees, and wires in and out. That is a feature list for an honest customer. It is also a feature list for a cartel. You have spent three years fighting bots on this platform. The day a bot can hold a wallet, the bot problem becomes a money laundering problem. Picture a fentanyl distributor in Phoenix with two hundred burner accounts, moving $900 at a time with no limits, cashed out through an X Card at an ATM anywhere in the world by Friday, with the fees reimbursed. Regulators call that structuring. Everyone else can see what it is.
Your website says a great deal about yield, cashback, and FDIC coverage. It does not say one word about how X Money verifies who a customer is or watches where the money goes. Maybe that work is being done quietly. If it is, I would be glad to be wrong. If it is not, that is the gap Block just paid $764 million for.
I am asking for a conversation. With you, with whoever leads financial crimes at X Money, or with anyone there who has the power to make a difference. Please allow me the honor of helping make X Money better and protecting the financial system of the United States of America.
Thank you for all you do for this country.
With sincere respect,
Everett A. Stern
HSBC Whistleblower
Founder and Intelligence Director, Tactical Rabbit