☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm) profile picture

Los memes me radicalizaron

Joined December 2018
Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)Photo by ☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 (@bartok_mlm)
The video was talking about rewarding work more. Not giving more work.
They should give construction workers spoons to maximize work.
5
13
15,168
Los derechos humanos se refieren a reconocer que para mantener una sociedad sana debemos ayudar a los más des favorecidos. Por eso la idea de que "aquello que necesite el trabajo de otros no debería ser un derecho humano" es la tontería más grande.
1
1
212
Cuánta razón tenía Marx cuando escribió que los gobiernos capitalistas son dictaduras de la clase poseedora. Los ideologos capitalistas hasta lo postean abiertamente.
Pregunta incomoda, que prefieren: Dictadura de partido único con economía capitalista (China o Singapur) Democracia de vete a tu a saber que votan los subnormales que tenemos de conciudadanos
2
1
10
507
"No new wealth is created from moving commodities around." This is obviously wrong. If John has a bunch of oil he does not use and Jason needs oil to use, then Quinn is creating wealth by getting the oil from John to Jason.
Correct, they're not creating new products (aka wealth) they are just transfering products from one side to the other. No new wealth is created from moving commodities around.
6
22
705
8,867
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
On August 22, 1989, Black Panther Party cofounder Huey P. Newton was murdered in Oakland. Recalling his 1971 visit to Mao Zedong’s China, he wrote: My experiences in China reinforced my understanding of the revolutionary process and my belief in the necessity of making a concrete analysis of concrete conditions. The Chinese speak with great pride about their history and their revolution and mention often the invincible thoughts of Chairman Mao Tse-tung. But they also tell you, “This was our revolution based upon a concrete analysis of concrete conditions, and we cannot direct you, only give you the principles. It is up to you to make the correct creative application.” It was a strange yet exhilarating experience to have traveled thousands of miles, across continents, to hear their words. For this is what Bobby Seale and I had included in our own discussions five years earlier in Oakland, as we explored ways to survive the abuses of the capitalist system in the Black communities of America. Theory was not enough, we had said. We knew we had to act to bring about change. Without fully realizing it then, we were following Mao’s belief that “if you want to know the theory and methods of revolution, you must take part in revolution. All genuine knowledge originates in direct experience.” -Huey P. Newton, Revolutionary Suicide
5
272
6
780
13,856
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
Unintentionally hitting on a major philosophical problem. Empiricism suggests that all knowledge must be built on sense data (essentially what science is). But there is no sense data that can prove your senses can be relied upon, thus it cannot support its own basic premise.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
222
705
86
12,906
311,760
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
¿Alguna vez te has parado a pensar por qué, a pesar de los miles de libros de autoayuda, apps de meditación y discursos sobre el "autocuidado", la sociedad está más ansiosa, deprimida y quemada que nunca? No es un fallo del capitalismo. Es su mayor triunfo. 1/11
14
264
22
694
23,324
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
Mao Zedung’un “iki çizgi mücadelesi”, klasik Stalinist parti anlayışından önemli bir kopuş noktasıdır. Stalinist modelde parti içindeki görüş ayrılıkları tartışmayla çözülür; karar alındıktan sonra esas olan irade ve eylem birliğidir. Mao ise çelişkinin parti iktidara geldikten sonra da ortadan kalkmadığını savundu. Bu yüzden parti içinde sürekli olarak proleter ve burjuva siyasal çizgilerin yeniden üretilebileceğini, sosyalizm altında dahi sınıf mücadelesinin parti içine taşınacağını ileri sürdü. Kısacası: Stalin: Çelişkiyi çöz, partiyi birleştir modelini savundu. Mao: Birlik kur ama çelişkinin yeniden doğacağını asla unutma keşfini yaptı. Maoizm açısından parti yekpare bir blok değil, sınıf mücadelesinin bizzat sürdüğü alanlardan biridir. Bu nedenle Maoizm, Stalinizm'in olumlu bir şekilde aşmış, parti içinde tespit edilebilen revizyonist anlayışları kitle mücadelesini gerektiğinde Kültür Devrimi pratiği ile en aşağıda bulunan işçi, köylü ve gençlik yığınlarına teslim edebilmiştir.
4
24
3
119
5,370
Aquellos que usan la palabra "la izquierda" así en general no entienden que los partidos comunistas tambien suelen tener un ala derechista. Aunque la derecha de los Comunistas está a a la izquierda de todos los Capitalistas.
1
304
Algo de dialéctica: La libertad implica su opuesto, la opresión, porque para que uno sea totalmente libre debe quitar libertad a otros. No podemos ser todos completamente libres. La libertad tiene sus límites.
201
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
Maoist diyalektiğe göre gerçek birlik, yanlış olanla doğru olanı ayırmadan kurulamaz. Aynı şekilde her ayrışma da daha ileri bir birliğin koşullarını yaratır. Birliği korumak adına çelişkileri gizlemek oportünizmdir; ayrılığı amaç hâline getirmek ise sekterliktir.
1
4
1
34
3,786
La oferta y la demanda explican porque el precio de una mercancía fluctúa. Pero no explican porque una mercancía consistentemente se vende por el doble de precio que otra. A esto último le es pertinente el valor de las mercancías.
2
1
1
821
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
I got thousands of rare Cultural Revolution-era photos from a historical archive here in China. I believe some of these have never been posted online, or only exist behind extremely expensive licenses. So here they are, for free. Open the thread for more.
115
1,812
96
12,788
588,780
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
Mao's thought from the 1950s is not contiguous with the posthumous reform period. In his evaluation of the Great Leap Forward and critique of the Soviet political economy, for example, he was already supremely critical of the theory of productive forces.
Maoist or other strands of anti revisionist do this weird thing where they hyper focus on the Mao of the 1960s, while ignoring a lot of Mao’s political thought from the 50s or even late 70s, which hampers them from seeing the real continuity of mao China and post Mao China
7
25
1
165
6,949
Colonization is not the same as competition as we understand it now (motivation to work harder). Stop unilaterally universalizing historical categories to prove your nonsense points of view.
And then that tribe competed against the highly patriarchal societies of the British/Spanish colonizers, and they lost horribly. Turns out, societies where women separate children from their fathers are not very competent and get wiped out easily.
2
1
4
891
Also, you're undermining your own argument because competition would then mean death for the losers and who would be motivated to work like that?
1
153
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
Ningún partido político estable en la democracia liberal del capital puede sostenerse sin corrupción, prebendas, puertas giratorias, chantajes, explotación y expolio de lo público. No es cuestión de honradez. Es la economía política del capitalismo.
38
55
1,134
Aparentemente la revolución dejo de ser "la despiadada crítica de todo lo existente" (Marx) para convertirse en "considerar los sentimientos de los explotadores".
5
95
3
658
9,428
☭ Camarada Bartok 📕 retweeted
"No que diz respeito à violência, partimos do princípio estabelecido pelo presidente Mao Tsetung: a violência, que é a necessidade da violência revolucionária, é uma lei universal sem exceção. A violência revolucionária é o que nos permite resolver contradições fundamentais por meio de um exército, por meio da guerra popular. Por que partimos da tese do presidente Mao? Porque acreditamos que Mao reafirmou o marxismo nesta questão, estabelecendo que não há exceções a esta lei. O que Marx sustentava, que a violência é a parteira da história, continua a ser uma contribuição totalmente válida e monumental. Lênin expôs sobre a violência e falou sobre o elogio panegírico de Engels à violência revolucionária, mas foi o presidente quem nos disse que era uma lei universal, sem exceção. Por isso tomamos sua tese como ponto de partida. Esta é uma questão essencial do marxismo, porque sem a violência revolucionária uma classe não pode substituir outra, uma velha ordem não pode ser derrubada para criar uma nova - hoje uma nova ordem liderada pelo proletariado através dos partidos comunistas." -Presidente Gonzalo
25
1
82
2,215