Damn this is a good ass tweet
Stop posting on X.
Seriously.
If you're under 500 followers, every tweet you publish is not worth the time.
Here's what I figured out after wasting weeks making tweets:
You're playing the wrong game for your follower count.
I call it the "Engagement Ladder".
And 90% of people are on the positioning themselves on the wrong rung.
The brutal truth:
Until you hit critical mass, nobody cares about:
→ Your morning routine
→ Your hot takes
→ Your project updates
→ Your motivational wisdom
They don't care because they don't know you yet.
You haven't earned the right to flex.
Ever copy a viral tweet from a 50k account and get 2 likes?
"Hard work beats talent" gets them 8,000 likes.
You post the same thing → 3 likes, 1 from that random account with a picture of a cat.
It's not the content. It's the ladder.
Here's the actual Engagement Ladder:
STAGE 1: 0-500 followers: STOP POSTING. START REPLYING.
Your tweets get zero algorithmic reach.
You're invisible.
So stop screaming into the void.
Instead: 100 replies per day to trending posts in your niche.
Make yourself visible in OTHER people's comments.
That's the only strategy that works at this level.
500-3,000 followers: VALUE ONLY
Now you can tweet.
But ONLY tactical lessons they can use today.
"Here's how I got 1,000 users"
"The exact cold email that got 30% replies"
"My Cursor setup that saves 10 hours/week"
No fluff. No motivation. No "building in public" updates.
Nobody cares about your journey (yet).
Give them something they can steal.
STAGE 2: 3,000-10,000 followers: OPINIONS UNLOCKED
Now you can share takes.
"Here's why no-code is dead"
"Agencies > SaaS for first-time founders"
"Y Combinator is overrated"
You have enough credibility that people want to hear your POV.
But it still needs to teach something.
STAGE 3: 10,000-100,000 followers: LIFESTYLE FLEX TIME
This is where you can post:
→ "Coding from a beach in Bali"
→ "My morning routine as a 6-figure founder"
→ "What I had for breakfast"
People know you now. They're invested in your journey.
The mundane becomes interesting because they care about YOU.
STAGE 4: 100,000+ followers: POST WHATEVER YOU WANT
Politics rants. Random thoughts. Shower wisdom.
At this scale, you're a personality.
People follow for you, not just your content.
Why this matters:
Most people try to skip rungs.
They're at 800 followers posting:
"Building in public! Day 47 of my SaaS journey 🚀"
Zero engagement.
Meanwhile, someone with 80k posts the same thing and gets 500 likes.
Same content. Different rung.
The mistake I see everywhere:
People at 1,000 followers trying to post like they're at 50k.
Motivational quotes. Morning routines. Hot takes on politics.
Nobody cares.
You haven't earned that yet.
What actually works:
Match your content to your rung:
Under 500? Don't post. Just engage.
500-3k? You're a teacher, not a personality.
Teach. Give tactical value. Make them smarter in 60 seconds.
Save the flexing for when you have 10k+.
The controversial part:
Those "inspiring" tweets from big accounts?
They're not what got them big.
They got big by providing insane value when they were small.
Now they've earned the right to post lazy motivation.
You haven't.
Based on my learning of this platform:
Stop trying to be motivational.
Stop sharing your "journey."
Stop posting your hot takes.
If you're under 500 (lik me), stop posting completely. Just reply.
If you're 500-3k, stop posting anything that isn't pure value.
Until you're over 3,000 followers, you're invisible.
So give value so good they can't ignore you.
Teach them something worth stealing. Every. Single. Tweet.
The Engagement Ladder is real.
Know which rung you're on.
Or keep wondering why your posts get 3 likes while the same content from big accounts gets 3,000.
So did all the people who were on FB back when it was LinkedIn for affiliate marketing move here? Or where are people at now
Join me and writers worldwide in the Screenwriting Challenge kicking off on March 15th! Learn more at nycmidnight.com/scc
Join me and writers around the world in the Short Story Challenge kicking off January 20th! Learn more at nycmidnight.com/ssc
Join me and writers around the world in the Short Story Challenge 2022 kicking off January 14th! Learn more at nycmidnight.co/SSC
Google Docs: Hey I see your sentence starts with "I", is this gonna end with "love you"?
Me: Ya whoa
GD: This one starts with "You". Press tab to fill in "You are amazing"
Me: Nice that's better than what I had
Me: We
Me: It
Me: Our
Me: Hey bro did you see my new sentence?
Join me and writers around the world in the Short Story Challenge 2022 kicking off January 14th! Learn more at nycmidnight.co/SSC
Even though it's a few years old by now, this @copyhackers vid is still super relevant. Would love to see more behind-the-scenes thinking from copywriters like Joanna shares here! copyhackers.com/conversion-c…
Ever wondered what goes into a powerful global brand? Our VP of Marketing & Communications, Petar Joseph, gives his experienced perspective in our latest interview! advidi.com/building-a-brand-…
Ben O retweeted
WHAT THE AFF has put together a monster giveaway.
A @wtaffco sponsored dinner with 5 best-in-the-biz guests, a ticket to AWA from @AWConferences, discounts from AdPlexity and @ThriveTracker, and 2 invites to Affiliate Business Club’s event.
Enter here: gleam.io/DYyYC/what-the-aff-…
Will you be at AWE? Meet me in Barcelona next month! :) advidi.com/clash-of-conferen…
...and don't stop searching until you find YOURS! xitter.gq/naval/status/100210514…
Replying to @naval
Building specific knowledge will feel like play to you but will look like work to others.
From @johncarlton007:
"I can't do that" (translation: I WON'T do that)
"I don't have time for that" (translation: I won't MAKE time for that)
The world may be grey, but sometimes looking at things in black & white can clarify the shades.
a very big win for my day
i don't even have an xbone or whatever you need for rdr2
it's just.. it just makes sense to me right now. these phantom cow men 🙏🤝🤝🤞 xitter.gq/IrregularDave/status/9…
Cool:
According to the third edition of Fowler's Modern English Usage, both analyze and the British spelling analyse are equally indefensible from an etymological perspective.
The correct but now impossible form should have been "analysize".
Analysize that!






