tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu) profile picture
Joined September 2021
Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)Photo by tun.btc (@bitcoin10wu)
我们很高兴地欢迎 Mark Wetjen 出任 Backpack US 总裁 Mark 曾担任 CFTC 委员兼代理主席和 DTCC 全球公共政策主管,是最早倡导为加密货币建立清晰监管框架和市场基础设施的美国监管机构之一 他将领导 Backpack 在美国的扩张,我们将继续构建受监管的链上金融基础设施,连接加密货币和传统金融 产品 合规 增长
11
10
5
58
18,993
Breaking: Former U.S. CFTC Commissioner is President of @Backpack U.S. now! you can see it on here. it's real! linkedin.com/in/mwetjen/
This quoted post is unavailable.
5
5
52
8,301
美股IPO,链上交易 通过我们的基础设施合作伙伴@SuperstateInc的支持,您可以在 Backpack 上直接进行美股IPO股份购买 真实股份,直接所有权 在@solana上
20
10
18
87
45,999
20% of Backpack equity given to users who stake for a year. Don't just use the next big thing. Own it. 🎒
329
278
336
1,640
795,349
I didn't come into crypto 9 years ago to launch a shit coin. I didn't come into crypto to get rich quick. I came into crypto because I believe it's going to change the world, and that the industry was something worth dedicating my life to. But somewhere along the way, amidst the booms, the busts, the moonshots, the decentralization theater, and the straight up scams, we lost our way. I don't know about you, but I'm just tired of false promises. And that's what most things are today, simply promises. We live in the most centralized era crypto has ever experienced, and the more centralized something is, the less meaningful a token is. While it's tempting to want to commit to these same promises, what happens if the team gets acquired? What happens if we want to re-invest into growth? What happens if we divert our time, energy, and resources out of band and circumvent the token altogether? What happens when the team and investors unlock? For many projects, the honest answer to these questions is not pleasant, and you see it in the price chart over and over again. Unless something is completely decentralized to the point where an immutable protocol can function with the team having retired in the Bahamas sipping pina coladas all day, then utility is just a promise. Often that promise is admirable and well intentioned--but ultimately an unenforceable promise nonetheless. Outside of BTC, ETH, SOL, and a few others, nothing really passes this test. Noble new token models have emerged to solve this problem (shout out to MetaDAO), and today, we introduce our own. Users that stake the Backpack token for at least a year will have the opportunity to exchange those tokens for equity at a fixed ratio--20% of the company today. It's such a simple idea, but as far as I'm aware, this is the first time a user has been able to earn the equity of a company by just using the product. So obvious in hindsight, and something I hope others start to adopt as they march on their path to progressive decentralization--both in crypto and outside of the industry. We have a lot more utility coming, things we'll share over the coming weeks, months, and year. As the Backpack community grows, we will decentralize the token, offering new things over time, some centralized like our equity offering, some decentralized as our product evolves. In the limit, I expect the token to represent more than anything a single company has to offer, but in the short run, it's the best we can do to show our long term commitment to our users. I've said it before and I'll say it again. I can't promise anything. The only thing I can promise is commitment. We go big or we go home--together, actually together.
20% of Backpack equity given to users who stake for a year. Don't just use the next big thing. Own it. 🎒
373
228
133
1,504
283,799
In the Backpack tokenomics, we have one guiding principle. - Insiders "dumping on retail" should be impossible: no founder, executive, employee, or venture investor should receive wealth from the token until the product hits escape velocity. Of course it begs the question, what does it mean to "hit escape velocity". Every project is different, and it's impossible to generalize. For Backpack, the answer is clear: we want to IPO in the USA. Going public might happen quickly, it might happen not so quickly, and in fact, it might not happen at all. In any case, we're going for it. But before going public, we have to grow--a lot. The odd thing about Backpack's growth over the past year--and in fact one of the things that makes Backpack so different from basically every token project in crypto--is that, today, Backpack Exchange only serves about 48% of the world. We've been very slow, very intentional about opening up our product to the world, ensuring that we have every "i" dotted and ever "t" crossed as a regulated financial institution. Growth that sometimes feels like running with a parachute, but we are happy to take the long path, because it's precisely that parachute that will allow us to fly. For those that don't know us, the reason for this is simple. Backpack is trying to not only build great crypto products, but we're also trying to build great TradFi products. We're trying to not only give our users access to every crypto asset, every blockchain, and every decentralized application, but we're also getting banking rails around the world, USD client money accounts in the USA, EUR in the EU, JPY in Japan--every currency on every major payment network you can imagine. We're trying to build a great securities product, whether that's getting access to your favorite stocks in a traditional brokerage or bidding on primary shares of a company about to go public on NASDAQ. We want to serve not only retail users worldwide, but we want to serve regulated products for regulated counterparties and regulated institutions around the world. All of this takes an enormous amount of time, effort, blood, sweat, and tears. We've been working on this for over three years at this point, laying an international foundation for the company and for the product slowly but surely, brick by brick. If we're lucky, we'll spend a lifetime. What this all means is that, in the most literal sense--and I know this sounds silly--we're just getting started. We still have half the world to open up into. We still have some of our most exciting products to launch. And this leads to our next guiding principle in our tokenomics. - Liquid tokens should exclusively go to users, fueling growth triggered by key product milestones. Every time we open up a new region, every time we launch a new product, that's an opportunity to grow. Open up EU => grow. Open up Japan => grow. Open up the USA => grow. Open up predictions => grow. Open up stocks => grow. Open up card => grow. Like gasoline onto a fire, the token serves to continuously kickstart new markets in the same way points kickstarted Seasons 1-4. With every growth lever we pull, tokens unlock in a predictable way to users, bringing in a new wave of token holders, growing the community, and allowing the product to soar to new heights. The objective constraint for this to work is precise: the value of added growth created by new token unlocks must always be greater than the dilution of those unlocks. As long as that condition holds, we can continue to unlock tokens direct to our most active users, growing along the way. Last but not least is the question: Ok so if all the liquid tokens are going to users, then what about the team? How exactly do you remain incentive aligned while ensuring the team cannot unlock, dump on retail, and become enormously wealthy without building something great? And the answer is simple: not a single founder, executive, team member, or venture investor has been given a direct token allocation. The entire "team allocation" sits in a "corporate treasury", i.e. on the balance sheet of the Backpack company--locked until at least one year post IPO. The team owns equity in the company, and the company owns a large percent of the token supply. It's not until the company goes public (or has some other type of equity exit event), that the team can earn any wealth from the project. It's not until the company has access to the largest, most liquid capital markets in the world by going public--and it's not until the company has done all the hard work to earn access to those markets--that the team can reap the rewards of the value created by the Backpack community from now until then. We either go big, or we go home.
25% on TGE Here's the entire token distribution Utility coming next 🎒
303
258
191
1,274
518,321
tun.btc retweeted
394
71
91
1,314
265,791
这种永续合约会创造夜间和周末的更大波动,对散户来说无疑放大风险,对交易所来说,收获更多交易量,更多的爆仓头寸,更丰厚的做市价差;这些成本全都由散户来出,股票资产证券化的各种问题一概不做,只保留交易量以及用户享受波动率的兴奋度,这就是行业T0交易所做的“创新”,把现有用户当作私域流量池,通过更多的资产发行,更大资产波动,更多衍生赌具,及时压榨流动性变现。
最近Bn陆续/计划上线了TSLA,INTC,Hood永续合约,这是一个很有意思的信号。抛开合规问题不谈,这反应出Crypto内生标的匮乏,只能加速从Tradfi引进新“赌具”,这也是过去行业行恶种种积累的结果。 进一步说“赌具中性论”最终会导致行业的荒芜化,沦为传统金融行业的附庸。赌徒是衣食父母,满足他们的一切胃口有短期的头部利益,长期的整体性伤害。 在这一点上,Tether在努力的引入黄金代币在Crypto的流通,技术爱好者们把眼光放在Openclaw上寻求AI结合Crypto的突破。凛冬已至,如何求变生存?
4
11
1,807
我们现在已经知道,10/10 那次暴跌,CZ 要负直接责任。 这周英文圈的推特一直在和 CZ 正面开战,因为事实已经很清楚:Binance 就是 10/10 暴跌的始作俑者。这次事件把传统金融的人吓跑了,也直接导致 BTC 和黄金、股票走势脱钩。 现在 CZ 已经开始破防了,先是取关了 Solana 的创始人,又开始编各种说辞、散布谎言。 但我们需要你的帮助,一起把 CZ 拉下马。 如果你认识掌握 Binance 非法上币、内幕交易,或者市场操纵等内幕信息的人,请鼓励他们站出来,把真相公开。
175
180
22
1,387
173,066
tun.btc retweeted
“当你在凝视深渊的时候,深渊也在凝视你。” 我们太清楚哪些路径能挣快钱、让用户更FOMO。但君子爱财,取之有道,也要取之有术。很多时候,真正难的不是“知道怎么快”,而是选择哪些钱不去赚。在大多数平台只盯上币、交易量与手续费时,OKX是少数真正回馈行业基石的力量——持续资助比特币核心开发,用真金白银守护其“底层安全”与“长期可持续性”。全力投入合规建设,搭建严谨的合规体系,争取更多主权国家与地区的认可,拿到关键牌照; 这一切,只为老板的愿望:我想为币圈正名。 我第一次听老板说这句话的时候,我觉得完成是很困难的。但当我看到,老板日复一日在群里发自己的使用产品反馈,用户在推特上的反馈,带队优化产品,畅聊行业热点的时候,我觉得好像每天都在离完成目标近一点。 为了做合规,老板自己抱着书啃,硬是把自己练成“半个合规员工”,只为在谈判桌上让监管方真正理解这个行业。前一阵老板与英国官员的合影,老板年会的时候自嘲,回去被老婆一顿说“结婚的时候都没见你穿西服!”可能穿上西服只是希望让行业对外的形象更好一些。 我也曾不断的凝视深渊,问老板“我们为什么不激进上币”、“给我们钱为什么不要”。但时间的证明了,Crypto是一个长线的事业,能留下来的,往往不是最快的那一批,而是愿意把边界想清楚的人,时间会给出答案。 希望有一天我们可以在任何地点和场合,坦诚自己在为之奋斗的行业,迎来的是尊重和羡慕。
No complexity. No accident. 10/10 was caused by irresponsible marketing campaigns by certain companies. On October 10, tens of billions of dollars were liquidated. As CEO of OKX, we observed clearly that the crypto market’s microstructure fundamentally changed after that day. Many industry participants believe the damage was more severe than the FTX collapse. Since then, there has been extensive discussion about why it happened and how to prevent a recurrence. The root causes are not difficult to identify. ⸻ What actually happened 1.Binance launched a temporary user-acquisition campaign offering 12% APY on USDe, while allowing USDe to be used as collateral with the same treatment as USDT and USDC, and without effective limits. 2.USDe is a tokenized hedge fund product. Ethena raises capital via a so-called “stablecoin,” deploys it into index arbitrage and algorithmic trading strategies, and tokenizes the resulting fund. The token can then be deposited on exchanges to earn yield. 3.USDe is fundamentally different from products such as BlackRock BUIDL and Franklin Templeton BENJI, which are tokenized money market funds with low-risk profiles. USDe, by contrast, embeds hedge-fund-level risk. This difference is structural, not cosmetic. 4.Binance users were encouraged to convert USDT and USDC into USDe to earn attractive yields, without sufficient emphasis on the underlying risks. From a user’s perspective, trading with USDe appeared no different from trading with traditional stablecoins—while the actual risk profile was materially higher. 5.Risk escalated further as users: •converted USDT/USDC into USDe, •used USDe as collateral to borrow USDT, •converted the borrowed USDT back into USDe, •and repeated the cycle. This leverage loop produced artificial APYs of 24%, 36%, and even 70%+, widely perceived as “low risk” simply because they were offered by a major platform. Systemic risk accumulated rapidly across the global crypto market. 6.At that point, even a small market shock was sufficient to trigger a collapse. When volatility hit, USDe depegged quickly. Cascading liquidations followed, and weaknesses in risk management around assets such as WETH and BNSOL further amplified the crash. Some tokens briefly traded near zero. The damage to global users and companies—including OKX customers—was severe, and recovery will take time. ⸻ Why this matters I am discussing the root cause, not assigning blame or launching an attack on Binance. Speaking openly about systemic risks is sometimes uncomfortable, but it is necessary if the industry is to mature responsibly. I expect there may be significant misinformation and coordinated FUD directed at OKX in the near future. Even so, speaking honestly about systemic risk is the right thing to do—and we will continue to do so. As the largest global platform, Binance has outsized influence—and corresponding responsibility—as an industry leader. Long-term trust in crypto cannot be built on short-term yield games, excessive leverage, or marketing practices that obscure risk. The industry needs leaders who prioritize market stability, transparency, and responsible innovation—not a winner-take-all mentality where criticism is treated as hostility. Crypto is still early. What we choose to normalize today will determine whether this industry earns lasting trust—or repeats the same mistakes again.
45
12
2
99
23,392
赵长鹏德不配位。 剥开CZ的神话,你看到的只是一个被运气推到风口浪尖的巨型中间商。 CZ的最大危机,在于其个人财富与行业贡献之间的深度断裂。 一个坐拥千亿资产、占据社会高位的领袖,如果对行业的贡献仅停留在撮合交易和应付监管,那他就是这个生态最大的负资产。 所谓的行业大佬,如果不能定义规则,那就只是一个体量庞大的叠码仔,他的德不配位是这一代加密难民集体交出的智商税。 他利用时代的红利建立了绝对的生态垄断,攫取了天文数字的财富,但在推动底层技术革命和规则演化上,他的产出几乎为零。 作为一个掌握全球数字流动性命门的人,他的格局和担当完全承载不起这份权力。 这种德不配位是一种高效的寻租行为,他收编了行业红利,却没能为未来提供任何架构级别的增量。
最近关于10/11的全网观点省流版: 主流讨论的是: Binance对于USDE,WBETH和BNSOL的指数规则其实不符合金融级要求,在普遍循环贷和统一账户的情况下,触发了级联清算,甚至有部分阴谋论认为是Binance主动触发。 其次是,由于服务器流量激增,包括Binance,OKX在内的大型交易所均有出现短暂API不可访问情况,是属于《用户协议》里的豁免规则还是交易所要进行赔偿? 还有一部分批评者抱怨Binance作为“区块链”行业龙头起到的正面带头作用过少,更像是互联网电商公司,在上币部分奉行扶持自己人,排他主义,而在面对质疑的时候更习惯使用“公关战术”。 一部分人则认为是大众看到传统资产的上涨,币圈缺处于熊市的情绪宣泄,以及可能来自竞争对手的攻击。 最后一部分有意义的想法是,让BINANCE进行BTC储备(已经接受),公布比现在更详细的清算数据,建立更透明的报告机制。 非本人观点,内容来自于时间线总结。
25
33
6
274
121,141
我觉得这就是在骗傻逼! 对的! 虽然我是币安用户,也希望币安一直好好的,毕竟我在里面还有很多资金,但是,这解释太侮辱用户智商了! 并且逻辑有问题! 高峰期的时候 现货,期货互相转移不了 包括,所谓:少数用户在后端调用失败,界面显示为0 当显示为0的时候还怎么调用资金,那就是看不见啊! 看不见你让用户拿出你为啥不平仓不转移资产加保证金的证据! 这个逻辑非常的搞笑! 对客户的逻辑是:爆仓就爆仓了,除非拿出你可以不爆仓的证据! 诚然,爆了就是爆了,所有韭菜愿赌服输! 但是这么解释,并且说 “除了技术改进之外,截至 2025 年 10 月 22 日,我们已向受上述两起事件影响的合格用户全额补偿” 我觉得应该改为: “我们向有视频和照片证据的合格用户给予全额补偿” 我觉得,不需要侮辱他人智商,有问题,承认,就是我们的问题。 处于一个成立不到10年的公司,有问题很正常,改正,继续前行! 一点问题没有,毕竟哪怕出问题,也是目前市面上安全梯队属于第一级别的! 但是这个公告,看了让人对币安这个事儿很反感! 非常反感!
10/10’s myths and facts explained. 👉 binance.com/en/blog/communit…
38
9
1
129
48,365
权力的傀儡终将被权力抛弃,背离初心的帝国终将土崩瓦解!这句话时间也会验证的!
权力傀儡赵长鹏与币安帝国的荒诞终章:从信仰崩塌到帝国瓦解的必然之路 在加密货币的狂野丛林里,赵长鹏曾以“币圈首富”“交易所之王”的身份叱咤风云。但当聚光灯褪去,人们将会惊觉,这位看似掌控数字财富帝国的人物,不过是权力棋局里一枚精致却脆弱的傀儡。 他与美国政治势力的勾连,尤其是与特朗普家族的权钱交易传闻,不仅献祭了无数投资者的利益,更在历史的镜鉴中,写下了又一段“与权力共舞者终将反噬”的荒诞注脚。 一、权力交易的傀儡:特赦背后的血腥“投名状” 2025年10月24日,特朗普签署特赦令的那一刻,赵长鹏的“救赎”看似尘埃落定,实则是一场权钱交易的“交割仪式”。 为换取这份特权,他向特朗普家族支持的加密货币公司WLFI注入巨额资本,与特朗普家族及其关联势力深度绑定: • 不仅为特朗普家族支持的加密公司“世界自由金融公司(WLFI)”推出的稳定币USD1编写底层代码。 • 还推动在一笔20亿美元的股权交易中使用该稳定币,为其创造持续收益。 • 更公开表态“全力以赴助力美国成为全球加密货币之都”“特朗普就是中本聪”等跪舔言论。 • 甚至有报道称特朗普家族将入股美国币安。 这些行为精准迎合了特朗普政府的加密行业战略叙事,赵长鹏以技术、资本与战略立场的多重妥协,完成了这场权钱交易的筹码支付。 更在10月11日那场“史诗级”币圈暴跌中,配合特朗普制造市场动荡,人为制造币安系统错误,收割了无数散户的“人头”。这场暴跌,是赵长鹏献给权力的“投名状”——用万千投资者的财富,铺就自己的特赦之路。 他或许以为抱住权力的大腿就能高枕无忧,却忘了历史的铁律:与权力共舞者,终将成为权力的祭品。回望历史,与权力深度绑定的“傀儡”们,结局从未光鲜。 从垄断私酒、贿赂官员建立黑帮商业帝国的阿尔·卡彭,到依附叶利钦政权操纵选举的俄罗斯寡头别列佐夫斯基;从沦为美国政商合谋牺牲品的阿尔斯通高管皮耶鲁齐,到靠勾结政客维系商业版图的意大利传媒大亨贝卢斯科尼;再从中国历史上借权力贪腐亿万的和珅,到依附政治势力的“红顶商人”胡雪岩,这些跨越古今中外的名字,都刻着“商与权勾连”的共同烙印,也最终吞下了相同的苦果。 • 卡彭以权力为保护伞攫取暴利,最终因税务欺诈锒铛入狱,在狱中耗尽健康、黯然离世。 • 别列佐夫斯基曾狂言“能让猴子当总统”,却在权力更迭后遭清算,流亡英国后落得妻离财散、离奇身亡的结局。 • 皮耶鲁齐因所在企业卷入美国政商博弈,无辜沦为棋子,身陷囹圄的同时,企业核心业务也被迫贱卖给美国竞争对手。 • 贝卢斯科尼为商业利益向政客行贿,虽一度逃避重罚,最终仍难逃名誉扫地、商业帝国摇摇欲坠的命运。 • 和珅借乾隆宠信积累富可敌国的财富,却在靠山崩塌后被赐自尽、家产抄没。 • 胡雪岩靠左宗棠的政治庇护成为商界巨擘,一朝失去权力支撑便落得抄家破产、贫病而亡的结局。 赵长鹏与他们并无二致。他同样选择将权力当作“保护伞”,为换取特赦与政治势力勾结,以1011暴跌的方式献祭无数投资者的财富,用用户的血泪铺就个人的特权之路。这些前车之鉴早已证明,权力的天平从不会永远倾斜,“以权逐利”者终将因权力的更迭或反噬而崩塌。 他将币安的影响力作为筹码,与政治势力做交易,当交易的价值耗尽,赵长鹏也必将重蹈覆辙,成为权力棋局中被抛弃的棋子,为自己的贪婪与短视付出惨痛代价。他会像所有弃子一样,被权力的巨手无情抛弃,币安所谓的加密商业王国也终将倒塌。 二、信仰崩塌:从区块链布道者到指鹿为马的荒诞者 区块链的精神内核是去中心化、透明与自由,中本聪的初衷是打破中心化权力对金融的垄断。但现在的赵长鹏却反其道而行,不仅向中心化权力屈膝,更编造出“中本聪就是特朗普”的荒唐谎言。 这种对行业根基的背叛,是其信仰体系的彻底崩塌。他曾是区块链的布道者,如今却成了权力的传声筒;他曾宣称要建立公平的加密世界,如今却与政治势力勾结,将信赖他的用户视为可牺牲的筹码。 当一个行业的领军者放弃了灵魂与信仰,其构建的“帝国”,不过是空中楼阁。 三、1011事件:献祭信任的财富猎杀 10月11日的暴跌,是这场权钱交易最刺眼的注脚。无数投资者一朝之间资产归零——有人是刚入圈的年轻人,抱着财富梦all in;有人是谨慎的中年人,想为家庭增添保障。 他们曾将币安视为安全港湾,最终却发现自己成了权力交易的祭品。这不是简单的市场波动,而是一场精心策划的财富掠夺。赵长鹏为了换取特赦,不惜将信任他的用户推入深渊。 当赌场老板亲自下场抢夺赌客的赌资,这样的平台,何来公平与安全可言?赵长鹏在这场游戏中扮演了“刽子手”的角色,用散户的血泪,为自己的权力之路铺路。 他夜里能否安睡,我们不得而知,但历史会记得,每一次权力的狂欢背后,都是无数普通人的破碎人生。1011事件必将载入加密货币社区的历史,成为权力与资本勾结、牺牲用户利益的标志性注脚;赵长鹏也必将因此被永远打入行业的屈辱柱,沦为与那些“以权逐利反遭反噬”者为伍的反面典型。 他为换取特朗普的赦免特权,以这场暴跌献祭无数投资者的信任与财富,用用户血泪铺就个人特权之路,这种背离区块链精神、背弃用户的行径,早已注定其在行业史册中只能留下遗臭万年的屈辱印记。 四、币安帝国崩塌:大而不倒的虚妄泡沫 币安所谓的“大而不倒”,不过是建立在沙地上的城堡: 1. 产品乏力:生态布局“大而不强” 币安的生态图谱看似“全品类覆盖”,但细看之下,却是处处短板的“虚胖”: • 公链与DApp:BNB链和opBNB在技术创新、开发者生态上远不及以太坊,PancakeSwap的流动性和用户基数被Uniswap碾压。 • 金融与工具:Venus借贷、ListaDAO质押在安全性和规模上不敌Aave,Trust Wallet的生态兼容性远逊于MetaMask、OKX钱包等。 • 非核心板块:币安广场的内容质量、CoinMarketCap的中立性饱受质疑,Meme发射器、投资基金更像是“凑数”的配套。 这些产品依赖“币安流量”而非“自身优势”,用户离开币安生态,总能找到体验更好的替代方案。所谓“大而不倒”,不过是中心化流量支撑的荒诞泡沫。 2. 诚信破产:双标对待,毫无底线 “方舟计划”是缓兵之计,拖延和拒绝赔付用户的伎俩。区别对待用户: • 国外大额亏损能赔,跪舔币安的KOL们能赔,有利益相关的做市商们能赔。 • 国内信任他的中小散户却无人问津,双标彻底击碎信任。 3. 用户背离:核心资产正在流失 当中大户和资深投资者纷纷撤离,币安的流量基石将渐渐被掏空。 4. 随意冻结:暴露霸权本质 利用Alpha查女巫,实则随意冻结大户资金,这又暴露了什么呢? 企业长久发展的核心,是创始人坚定的信仰坚守、是对用户的诚信负责,是“用户至上”的理念。但赵长鹏早已将这些抛之脑后,他的币安王国,犹如穿着皇帝新衣的闹剧,在一群养着的KOL们的跪舔下,看似华丽、热闹,实则千疮百孔。 五、终局已定:背离初心者的必然结局 历史反复证明,任何缺乏诚信、背离用户、为权力屈膝的企业,都难逃崩塌的命运。赵长鹏的币安帝国,是谎言、权力交易和用户牺牲堆砌的泡沫。 赵长鹏或许以为,特赦是权力给他的“免死金牌”,却没看清权力本身就是最大的泡沫。特朗普的政治生涯充满变数,其家族的影响力也如镜花水月。今日的“盟友”,明日可能就是“弃子”。 当权力的风向转变,赵长鹏的特赦令不过是一张废纸。他为权力付出的代价——投资者的信任、币安的声誉、行业的秩序——却再也无法挽回。他被困在自己编织的权力牢笼里,看似自由,实则早已沦为囚徒。 当用户信任消耗殆尽,当行业唾弃声此起彼伏,币安的崩塌只是时间问题。赵长鹏或许能凭权力交易获得一时“安全”,但他失去的是整个行业的尊重和用户的忠诚。 在加密货币的历史长河中,他终将成为反面教材——权力的傀儡终将被权力抛弃,背离初心的帝国终将土崩瓦解。 @cz_binance @brian_armstrong @haydenzadams @star_okx @benbybit @haydenzadams @brian_armstrong @lyu_johnny @AntonioMJuliano @VitalikButerin @toly @rajgokal @gavofyork @rphmeier @aantonop @ErikVoorhees @balajis @lopp @Gladstein @nic_carter @MartyBent @laurashin @APompliano @saylor @AltcoinDaily @SECGov @CFTC @FinCENnews @FBI @MAS_sg @ESMAComms @JFSA_en @liangxihuigui @APompliano @CoinDesk @zachxbt
3
4
1
31
5,689
25% on day one. As we approach TGE, we'll be releasing our tokenomics, one step at a time. It's unclear if "token" will even be the right way to describe our TGE. It'll be a token in form, but everything about it will be different from the status quo. The distribution will be different. The utility will be different. Even the functionality will be different. In fact, it'll be so different that it probably warrants a new name, a topic for another day. Today, we only serve about ~48% of the world. Over the next year, we'll be opening up Backpack to the rest of the world, releasing new products, and expanding the community along the way. To be definitively clear with no exception: There has never been a sale of a single Backpack token, and the entire supply will go towards growing Backpack into one of the largest financial institutions in the world. We've come a long way, and we have an even longer way to go. LFG
There are 40m points being redistributed over the next 4 weeks. oh, one more thing: 25% on TGE 🎒
204
109
63
814
130,760
tun.btc retweeted
个人血泪:2011年崩盘,我亲眼看着资产腰斩 亨特兄弟的剧本,在2011年又演了一次,而我成了亲历者。 2011年4月25日,白银触及高点,家人满仓持有实物银条和期货多单,本以为能再赚一笔,却被五一假期的停盘打懵。海外市场在假期疯狂暴跌,国内复盘直接低开熔断——既不能平仓止损,手里的实物银条也没人接手,眼睁睁看着账户资金腰斩,最后只能割肉离场。 如今再看2025-2026年的暴涨,市面上鼓吹的“实物短缺”,不过是换了包装的老套路。作为见证过三轮行情的人,我太清楚:实物交割从来不是价格暴涨的决定因素。 真相拆解:别被“实物短缺”骗了,涨跌都在期货市场 戳破“实物不够用”的谎言 1. 工业需求无爆发式增长:光伏、新能源汽车的用银需求是稳步递增的,符合行业规划,绝不可能短时间翻两三倍,所谓“缺口”都是被放大的假象; 2. 企业早已锁价对冲:用银企业不会边生产边承受价格波动,比如光伏企业会提前锁定全年采购价,银价涨上天也与生产成本无关; 3. 企业经营未受冲击:若真有实物短缺、价格挤压利润,早该出现光伏企业停工、用银工厂倒闭的消息,但实际并无此事,说明实物供应稳定,交割占比极低。 暴涨真相:期货市场的“击鼓传花” 白银暴涨的核心,是期货市场的预期炒作: 1. 机构引导情绪:释放“白银将暴涨”的消息,掺杂部分真实数据,无限放大稀缺性,制造“买必赚”的共识; 2. 资金疯狂涌入:以上期所为例,白银期货交易量从30万手飙至100多万手,做多单增长三四倍; 3. 情绪推高价格:大家抱着“今天买、明天涨”的心态只买不卖,价格与实物供需无关,纯粹是市场情绪的狂欢。 暴跌推手:从未变过的“组合拳” 每一轮暴涨的结局都是暴跌,推手都是期货机构(背后牵扯各国政府博弈),手段几十年未变: 1. 限制持仓:切断做多资金流入,给行情“断供”。 2. 限制实物交割:客户买4公斤白银,却被要求排队提货、分批提取(一次50克),无法对冲风险。 3. 提高保证金:从5%强制提至15%-20%,满仓投资者要么借钱补保证金,要么被强制平仓(多单平仓即大量卖出)。 4. 踩踏式暴跌:集中卖出引发无对手盘,价格1-2天内跌至谷底。 风险警示:普通人别当“接盘侠”,这些坑一定要避开 作为过来人,我必须提醒:参与白银投机,普通人的风险几乎是百分之百: 1. 实物白银难变现:暴跌时商家拒收,15公斤板料从30万跌至15万,却卖不出去。 2. 多空都是高危:做多可能遭遇熔断式暴跌,做空可能先被暴涨爆仓。 3. 消息永远滞后:等你收到暴跌消息,市场已恐慌抛售,根本来不及反应。 4. 行情无技术性可言:所有技术分析、消息面都是机构引导入场的假消息,本质是在庄家定规则的赌场赌博。 结尾:敬畏市场,远离投机才是生存之道 半个世纪前,亨特兄弟用垄断制造虚假短缺,最终被市场反噬。 2011年,期货炒作收割散户,家人亲身承受损失。 2025-2026年,尽管有人说“这次是产业驱动的价值重估”,但炒作的内核从未改变。 资本可以撬动一时行情,却对抗不了市场规律。 产业需求增长是事实,但被无限放大的“缺口”,不过是投机者的诱饵。 12年的血泪教训告诉我:任何脱离基本面的暴涨,最终都会回归本质,付出代价的永远是跟风的普通人。如果你想做资产配置,白银从来不是好选择。 如果抱着“一夜暴富”的心态冲进场,大概率会重演亨特兄弟和我家人的悲剧。 敬畏市场,坚守规则,远离白银投机,这是我能给大家最实在的忠告。
37
55
9
338
106,810