J

The victim and her friend went to see Russell Brand's show. The victim had a boyfriend, but when Russell Brand invited her and her friend backstage, she happily accepted the invitation. Within minutes of meeting Russell Brand backstage, her tongue was allegedly deep in his arsehole while her friend was blowing him. A consensual sexual encounter involving all three was underway. Then, according to the allegation, he flipped her over and engaged in anal sex with her, which she says she did not consent to. And THAT is the allegation at the centre of this case. Don't forget, she reportedly went to watch another Russell Brand show approximately six months later. I have questions. A LOT of questions. Seems to me like they wanted all of it. If me as a victim after all the shit I went through i go back to see a show from the guy i say that did this to me take it as im no victim but more like a sl*t. Who would go back when they were hurt and forced to do things.. If i go back its because i like the guy and i want more of him like wtf.. This makes no sense !! Something about this entire story just doesn't sit right with me. Were they genuinely uncomfortable, or did they willingly participate in what happened backstage? What exactly happened that night? Are we getting the entire story, or only the version being presented? And here's what I keep questioning: why did she reportedly go back to another Russell Brand show six months later? If someone had sexually assaulted me, violated my boundaries and forced themselves on me, I would have serious questions about voluntarily returning to see that person. I'm a survivor myself. I know what it means to have your NO ignored. I know what it means to have your body violated. So yes, I have questions. I want the timeline examined. I want inconsistencies investigated. I want the evidence examined. And if someone has lied, I want those lies exposed. But I also know that returning to a show doesn't automatically prove someone is lying. What I refuse to accept is a situation where questioning testimony is treated as forbidden. Serious allegations deserve serious scrutiny. The truth matters, regardless of whose side it supports.