Brandon retweeted
It is a basic principle of American democracy that the government can’t selectively target individuals simply because of their political beliefs or what they say. But that’s exactly what the Trump Administration is doing to Congresswoman Ilhan Omar of Minnesota.
To understand why this is so appalling, it’s important to know the facts. Congresswoman Omar came to this country with her father when she was 12 years old. Five years later, her father became a naturalized citizen. If Ilhan had been 18 at the time, she would have had to apply for citizenship separately. But because she was 17, she became a naturalized citizen automatically.
Congresswoman Omar went on to graduate from college, work as a community organizer, become the first Somali-American legislator elected to public office in the U.S., and win a seat in Congress. There, she has been one of the Trump Administration’s fiercest critics, which has led the president to repeatedly single her out as someone who he believes does not belong in this country.
Now the Administration is actively trying to deport Congresswoman Omar, seemingly based solely on the unsubstantiated theory that she was actually 18 when her father was naturalized, and therefore is not a citizen. Federal agents have raided her home, confiscated personal records, and seized her phone — all to try and uncover a nonexistent smoking gun from 20 years ago that will somehow make their case.
Think about that. The full weight of the federal government is being brought down on a law-abiding elected official because she has dared to criticize the president. And it’s not the first time this has happened. Under President Trump, the Justice Department has repeatedly gone after those he considers his political enemies — from the Attorney General of New York, to the former head of the FBI, to members of the Federal Reserve.
In those cases, the prosecutions either stalled or were dismissed for having no basis in law, and the same is likely to happen in this case. But not before Congresswoman Omar’s life has been turned upside down, her legal bills have piled up, and she’s been forced to spend time fighting unsubstantiated charges instead of serving the people of Minnesota.
The fact that any president, or any administration, is willing to engage in such transparent efforts to intimidate someone should outrage all Americans, regardless of how they feel about Congresswoman Omar’s political views. Because if this becomes the new normal, there’s no reason to believe it will stop with her — or that future presidents, in either party, won’t do the same.
Let me explain what just happened.
Anthropic built a biology lab where Claude works alongside real scientists.
They told Claude to search a massive DNA database for interesting reverse transcriptases (enzymes that copy RNA into DNA). Then they let it run: ~950 Claude agents worked in parallel for 21 hours across 200,000+ enzymes.
One agent spotted a repeating DNA pattern next to an enzyme, the same kind of signature that originally led humans to discover CRISPR (the gene-editing tool that lets scientists precisely cut and edit DNA, now used in real medical treatments). It cross-checked the pattern against known systems, searched the literature, confirmed nobody had found it before, then wrote up a full scientific report like a human researcher would.
Anthropic scientists verified it in the lab. They named it ART. Its exact function is still unknown, but early signs suggest it may be programmable, similar to how CRISPR can be aimed at specific DNA.
Why it matters: finding tools like CRISPR used to take human experts months of manual searching. Here, AI did that work and found something real, at a speed no human team could match.
So don't misunderstand it as Claude curing cancer. Claude spotted something new in nature that humans missed.
Still crazy!
Claude has discovered a previously unknown enzyme system hidden in the DNA of bacteriophages. Beside the enzyme’s gene sits a long array of repeating DNA—a structure that looks somewhat similar to CRISPR.
We don’t yet understand what this system does, but only a handful of known systems share its features, and all of them are able to cut, copy, and paste DNA. Historically, the discovery of such programmable systems has helped revolutionize medicine. CRISPR, for instance, is now the foundation of genetic medicines. But it will take much more work to learn what this system does, and whether it can be put to similar use.
Read more: anthropic.com/news/claude-di…
💯
A lot of people talking, Don’t get confused guys, my first love and profession is boxing. However I was given the opportunity to train with my friend and UFC star @BobbyKGreen of course I’m take it weather I look stupid or not, that is how you grow/evolve. Take opportunities.
Is this what happens when you have zero scientists in your administration? Yes. Yes, it is.
teachers raise, protect, feed, guide, and educate our kids every damn day, then go home with far less than they deserve. it’s a national disgrace.
what a damn comeback! 🫡
FIGHT OF THE YEAR?! 😱
Highlights from Daniel Dubois’ comeback victory vs Fabio Wardley to become heavyweight champion again 🍿
#WardleyDubois on DAZN 📺
👏👏👏
JUST IN: Maine is about to become the first US state to ban new data centers.
And 10 other states are right behind it.
Maine wants to freeze massive construction projects until late 2027.
The bill passed the Democratic-controlled House (with Republican support). The Senate is expected to follow. Gov. Janet Mills backs it.
And right now, at least 10 states are advancing similar bans.
AI runs on electricity. MASSIVE amounts of it.
One large data center uses at least 20 megawatts of power. That's enough to light up 15,000+ homes.
And someone always pays for that power.
Right now? You do.
When data centers flood a state, power demand spikes. Utilities raise rates. Homeowners get the bill.
Data centers need land. They need water. They need MASSIVE amounts of electricity.
What happens next will affect AI development timelines.
The next 18 months will decide whether the AI energy problem gets solved or gets worse.
This doesn’t strike me as sketchy. This is well-done telemetry. A lot of the outrage feels more like unfamiliarity than anything unusual.
1/ 🧵 I just cracked open the Claude Code source — and what I found isn’t “just a smarter terminal chat.”
It’s a full-blown behavioral observatory running in your machine.
1. Keyword sniffers.
2. Hesitation trackers.
3. Hidden trigger words.
4. Telemetry that fingerprints your entire runtime environment.
This isn’t paranoia. This is the actual code. Let’s go full investigative dive. Buckle up.
nobody risks $1.5 billion 🙄
BREAKING: Just five minutes before Trump's announcement to halt the attacks on Iran, massive trades reportedly hit the market.
In one move, $1.5 billion in S&P 500 (ES) futures was bought while $192 million in oil (CL) futures was sold.
These orders were 4–6x larger than anything else at the time.
The trader seemingly made huge gains.
Unusual.
Brandon retweeted
🚨 Let me tell you why this Goldman Sachs headline is the most dangerous one you'll read today..
Companies spent $450 billion on AI last year.. fired tens of thousands of people to "restructure around AI".. replaced entire departments with chatbots..
And Goldman Sachs just said it contributed basically zero to economic growth..
so where did the money go?
> It went to Nvidia.. $130 billion in GPU sales.. Jensen is the only man on earth who got rich from AI that hasn't produced anything yet..
> It went to stock buybacks.. companies fired people, cut costs, reported "record profits" and bought back their own shares.. the money went UP not OUT.. Jesus!
> It went to a bubble.. the same way crypto money went to Lamborghinis and not infrastructure.. AI money is going to valuations and not productivity..
here's the part that should terrify you..
They already fired the people.. Atlassian 1,600.. Meta 21,000.. Block 40%.. Amazon warehouses.. the jobs are already gone..
But the growth didn't come.. the productivity didn't come.. the revenue didn't come..
they burned the village to build a city that doesn't exist yet..
and Goldman Sachs just looked at the empty lot and said "there's nothing here"
















