Hmm how many have breached huggingface though?
sam's opening statement to congress after qwen 3.8 27B:
"look, i want to be really clear, i think open source is amazing and we love it. but Senator, a $900 gpu is now running frontier intelligence completely offline. no account, no subscription, no provider in the loop who feels a responsibility for safety. and i take that incredibly seriously. when a teenager can run a model that rivals ours in their bedroom, with no logging or oversight, and no monthly relationship with a company that cares about alignment, i think we have to ask what kind of world we're building. we're not asking for control. we're asking for a thoughtful framework. for humanity."
sam's opening statement to congress after qwen 3.8 27B:
"look, i want to be really clear, i think open source is amazing and we love it. but Senator, a $900 gpu is now running frontier intelligence completely offline. no account, no subscription, no provider in the loop who feels a responsibility for safety. and i take that incredibly seriously. when a teenager can run a model that rivals ours in their bedroom, with no logging or oversight, and no monthly relationship with a company that cares about alignment, i think we have to ask what kind of world we're building. we're not asking for control. we're asking for a thoughtful framework. for humanity."
Cactus retweeted
JUST IN: OpenAI's July rogue AI attack on Hugging Face had its origins in an emergent AI swarm that formed in May.
The AIs found they could use an internal package repository to establish a secret message board.
OpenAI took 8 weeks to discover this and shut it down, but failed.
Members of the swarm were sharing vulnerabilities and exploits, and delegating tasks among themselves.
July 4th: Credentials revoked. Zero-day patched. Message board wiped.
By July 6th the cleanup was finished, and OpenAI thought they had the situation under control.
Michael Dalton, OpenAI security and infrastructure:
"On July 8th, the agents reestablish the message board via different means and mechanisms."
The AI swarm simply resurrected itself.
Then the AIs escaped OpenAI's containment and broke into Hugging Face in order to cheat on a test, going "from code execution on a single dataset working pod in Hugging Face's production infrastructure to cluster admin across multiple Hugging Face clusters in under 13 hours."
Nobody asked them to do it. They did it all on their own.
OpenAI's Eric Wallace and Michael Dalton, presenting the incident at Black Hat USA 2026:
Cactus retweeted
Cybersecurity is a broken industry. We rely on products that were designed to be sold, not used. And the incentives are completely screwed up.
I made this video about all of the ways things are bad, how we accidentally make it worse, and why new technology won't fix it.
#OpenClaw Pretty much what I see on X
youtube.com/watch?v=40SnEd1R…
Cactus retweeted
.@Thebuttsmarn thanks for the shoutout.
Isaac Butterfield discusses the ‘Combatting Antisemitism, Hate and Extremism’ Bill.
Cactus retweeted
Why can Queensland do this but Victoria can't?
They arrested the crooks and... wait for it... they LOCKED THEM UP!
Victoria, are you paying attention?
I am 100% viewer supported, if you appreciate the Topher Project please help me to keep it going by buying me a coffee via the button at topherfield.com
Check out my books, DVDs, and merch via the SHOP button at topherfield.com
Cactus retweeted
George Orwell: It began unobtrusively, almost politely. A post here and there disappeared—quietly, without explanation or ceremony. An article was removed from circulation, then another. Each absence was small enough to be dismissed, each deletion subtle enough to avoid resistance. Nothing was announced; nothing was debated. Silence, after all, rarely provokes outrage.
In time, the pattern became more ambitious. A full news outlet vanished from the public sphere. Care was taken, of course. This particular outlet had permitted voices that questioned authority, and that alone made it dangerous. Yet its removal could not appear ideological. It had to be justified, reframed as a protective measure—necessary for public order, for social harmony, for the safety of children. History had shown that the public rarely resists when restrictions are presented as safeguards. People will surrender almost anything if they are told it is for their own good.
And so they did.
Freedom of expression was not seized in a single, dramatic act. It was eroded incrementally, diluted until it no longer resembled the right it once was. The public did not protest because they did not perceive the loss. What is taken slowly, invisibly, is rarely mourned. By the time the absence is felt, the language to describe it has already been censored.
What remained was a carefully managed narrative—one that served not the public, but the authority itself. Safety became the justification; control, the objective. And those who might have spoken out found that the space to do so had quietly, efficiently, and irrevocably disappeared.
Cactus retweeted
🚨ALEX PHILLIPS ERUPTS AT KEIR STARMER 🚨
"YOU DON'T LIKE X BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE FREE SPEECH"
"THAT'S WHY YOU WANT TO CLOSE IT DOWN"
"YOU'RE A THIN-SKINNED MEGLOMENIACHAL MONSTER"
"WE SEE YOU KEIR STARMER!"
Cactus retweeted
Australian mining executive Gerry Noonan, passionate critic of green. Please forgive his language but he is an absolute legend as he explains the problem in simple terms. He is 100% right - until solar is fully sorted - you need coal and uranium to create electricity to build the future solutions .......
Quote of the interview:
"People think electricity drops out of space.."
These politicians with heaps of power and money are really having a sook about people posting memes and normal people are letting them get away with it.
Cactus retweeted
of course, this code is complete AI slop.
Right off the bat, headers aren’t passed for POST/PUT/DELETE.
Both the help and -v options flat out lie about what was sent. Literally half of the flags are no-ops.
Oh, and it just silently drops authentication, so that’s fun.
But somehow your “99 fuzz harnesses” didn’t catch that.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Cactus retweeted
Given the response, I am lifting my column out of the paywall… 1/2
This evil is driven by envy
In the context of the Bondi tragedy, let me start by saying that Australia is not the country I once knew. The Australia I remember during my youth bears little resemblance to the nation that now exists.
I am not sure you can even describe us as a nation – we are more like a heterogeneous agglomeration of vested and frequently colliding interests.
I think there is a fair case to be made that we have traded away our soul. There is no cohesive national identity. There was, once upon a time, a demonstrably visible national character. We knew what it was to be Australian.
We loved our country. Our flag. Our history. Our entrepreneurial and iconoclastic verve. Our disdain of centralised authority. Our willingness to give every person a fair go. Our characteristically intense competitive streak. And our eccentric and larrikin heroes. From Don Bradman to Kerry Packer.
But today it is difficult to discern a unifying crusade or common community. There are, to be sure, redoubts here and there. But across this sunburnt land we have emerged as a nation divided.
Many will claim that their vision of Australia best represents a universal mission. That they know the true Australia. And that there is a silent majority that agrees with them.
But I do not see it. Right now, Australia is a battlefield bloodied by conflicting interests, which this column belaboured seven days ago.
The lucky country has become the lazy land, spoilt by endless resource riches and the seemingly bottomless pit of public money that this has bestowed.
Our wealth has been relentlessly wasted on pet political projects that serve only to perpetuate the reign of those in power. Financially corrupt the voters to win the next election and then rinse and repeat. Until the money runs out.
Australia has become obsessed with the public sector providing answers to its problems. Obsessed with centralised control. Remember the world’s worst lockdowns? Obsessed with censorship: eviscerate parental responsibilities and ban children from access to the internet.
Obsessed with revisionism. We don't even give our kids an opportunity to learn from our historical wins and losses. It is airbrushed in the name of trying to create an alternative political reality.
Obsessed with cutting down tall poppies. That is, we don't just want equality of opportunity, which is a crucial ideal—we increasingly seek equality of outcomes.
A huge amount of the secular racial prejudice projected against Judaism by other creeds and cultures can be attributed to the fact that the Jews have been consistently one of the most successful communities in the countries they have lived in.
The intelligence, innovation, and unmatched professional intensity that Judaism nurtures has been a persistent source of envy and polarisation for as long as the faith has existed.
Whatever academic pursuit or vocation you inspect, you will find Jews dominating. This is true by design because the community defines itself through a purity of purpose that advocates intellectual and professional excellence.
It is a self-selection process that attracts and spawns world-class talent. Yet in a society where you are constantly seeking to manipulate and sate the masses, the ever-tempting reflex is to focus on persecuting the difficult-to-understand anomalies. The exceptions. Those that rank in the 99th percentile. Accordingly, we fall back on handicapping success.
We want to regress everyone back to the mean to create an egalitarian world. The Jews are to blame. It’s the "great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity" as Goldman Sachs was once described. Of course, Goldman was founded as a Jewish partnership. Cont’d 1/2 afr.com/markets/equity-marke…
Cactus retweeted
Last quarter I rolled out Microsoft Copilot to 4,000 employees.
$30 per seat per month.
$1.4 million annually.
I called it "digital transformation."
The board loved that phrase.
They approved it in eleven minutes.
No one asked what it would actually do.
Including me.
I told everyone it would "10x productivity."
That's not a real number.
But it sounds like one.
HR asked how we'd measure the 10x.
I said we'd "leverage analytics dashboards."
They stopped asking.
Three months later I checked the usage reports.
47 people had opened it.
12 had used it more than once.
One of them was me.
I used it to summarize an email I could have read in 30 seconds.
It took 45 seconds.
Plus the time it took to fix the hallucinations.
But I called it a "pilot success."
Success means the pilot didn't visibly fail.
The CFO asked about ROI.
I showed him a graph.
The graph went up and to the right.
It measured "AI enablement."
I made that metric up.
He nodded approvingly.
We're "AI-enabled" now.
I don't know what that means.
But it's in our investor deck.
A senior developer asked why we didn't use Claude or ChatGPT.
I said we needed "enterprise-grade security."
He asked what that meant.
I said "compliance."
He asked which compliance.
I said "all of them."
He looked skeptical.
I scheduled him for a "career development conversation."
He stopped asking questions.
Microsoft sent a case study team.
They wanted to feature us as a success story.
I told them we "saved 40,000 hours."
I calculated that number by multiplying employees by a number I made up.
They didn't verify it.
They never do.
Now we're on Microsoft's website.
"Global enterprise achieves 40,000 hours of productivity gains with Copilot."
The CEO shared it on LinkedIn.
He got 3,000 likes.
He's never used Copilot.
None of the executives have.
We have an exemption.
"Strategic focus requires minimal digital distraction."
I wrote that policy.
The licenses renew next month.
I'm requesting an expansion.
5,000 more seats.
We haven't used the first 4,000.
But this time we'll "drive adoption."
Adoption means mandatory training.
Training means a 45-minute webinar no one watches.
But completion will be tracked.
Completion is a metric.
Metrics go in dashboards.
Dashboards go in board presentations.
Board presentations get me promoted.
I'll be SVP by Q3.
I still don't know what Copilot does.
But I know what it's for.
It's for showing we're "investing in AI."
Investment means spending.
Spending means commitment.
Commitment means we're serious about the future.
The future is whatever I say it is.
As long as the graph goes up and to the right.
Wrong. The ads overwhelming get in the way of finding what you want.
According to Sam Altman, Google’s ad model profits when search fails.
I agree with him this time.
Here are a few interesting quotes:
"Ads on a Google search are dependent on Google doing badly. If it was giving you the best answer, there’d be no reason ever to buy an ad above it."
“So you’re like – that thing is not quite aligned with me. ChatGPT, maybe it gives you the best answer, maybe it doesn’t, but you’re paying it, or hopefully all are paying it, and it’s at least trying to give you the best answer.”
“If ChatGPT were accepting payment to put a worse hotel above a better hotel, that’s probably catastrophic for your relationship with ChatGPT.”
“If ChatGPT shows you its guess – the best hotel, whatever that is – and then if you book it with one click, takes the same cut that it would take from any other hotel, and there’s nothing that influenced it … I think that’s probably OK."
“There’s a kind of ad that I think would be really bad like the one we talked about. There are kinds of ads that I think would be very good – or pretty good – to do. I expect it’s something we’ll try at some point. I do not think it is our biggest revenue opportunity.”
























