https://xitter.gq/t.co/FGDIsXlEwT $HEX @TimePaysMe
Joined September 2021
- Tweets729
- Following54
- Followers696
- Likes37.2K
⬡ Chris J retweeted
I posted a link to this but also wanted to post it on X for posterity.
Grab a coffee and take a minute to listen to Richard Heart.
All credit goes to @hexedits369 for this masterpiece
⬡ Chris J retweeted
PulseChain is better than XRP, and most other things. XRP just had an infinite mint inflation bug. Luckily, responsibly disclosed for a $250k bounty instead of exploited. Or you know, you could just use PulseChain and stop playing with garbage... PLS has The legendary ETH testnet
⬡ Chris J retweeted
Ethereum, Solana, Don't open up your metamask for a while, and if it's open, close it. Their infra got hacked. Which means the chances of someone pushing an evil update are probably higher.
I tell everyone how to do things better, but they don't listen, lol. Auto-updates are a huge security risk.
This is why the software at PulseChain, PulseX, HEX, is software you can download and not worry about it autoupdating on you.
Hopefully metamask gets it all sorted, but even if they do, autoupdate will still always be a threat to you.
Just looking out for you all out there.
⬡ Chris J retweeted
Why I asked those sites to fix their PulseChain pages.
A lot of articles still say PulseChain was a "snapshot" — that Ethereum's state was copied and loaded onto a new chain.
That is not what happened.
PulseChain is a hard fork of Ethereum mainnet.
Same genesis as Ethereum.
Same history from block 0.
No new genesis. No snapshot. No halt.
The fork activates at PrimordialPulseBlock 17,233,000.
You can check genesis yourself:
ipfs.scan.pulsechain.com/blo…
Hash:
0xd4e56740f876aef8c010b86a40d5f56745a118d0906a34e69aec8c0db1cb8fa3
That is Ethereum's genesis. PulseChain starts there.
"Snapshot" was the easy word. It helped people picture token copies showing up in the same address. I get why it spread. But it describes the wrong machine.
A snapshot is: freeze state, start a new chain.
A hard fork is: keep the original chain, change the rules at a block, continue.
Those are not the same thing. One implies a new beginning. The other is a continuation.
This matters more now than it did in 2023, because this is what AI reads.
Models do not pull truth out of the client. They read the internet. Ranked blogs, explainers, "what is PulseChain" pages. If those pages all say snapshot, the model says snapshot. Then the next article quotes the model. Then the next model trains on that. The error compounds.
I watched this happen. Ask an AI what PulseChain's fork was, and it will often give you the blog version — snapshot, new chain, state copied onto genesis — instead of the client version. Shared genesis. Full history. Hard fork at 17,233,000.
The official sources were never unclear. go-pulse, the node docs, the explorer. The secondary layer flattened it.
So I asked the sites that still say snapshot to update. Not to score points. So the public record matches the chain, and so the next thing that learns from the web learns the actual design.
If you write about PulseChain, please use hard fork. Point at genesis. Point at 17,233,000. The shorthand already did enough damage.
⬡ Chris J retweeted
.@adam3us called me a "scammer and con-artist."
His Bitcoin sidechain just got hacked for $320 million of BTC. How's that bag of dicks taste Adam? Adam is CEO/cofounder of blockstream btw.
P.S. PulseChain is better than your trash. Loser, lol.
Also, shout out @Excellion, @NickSzabo4 & other Blockstream hoes. Lol. Kneel.
P.P.S Magnanimus in victory.
BTW, some large portion of Bitcoin has despised blockstream for many many reasons for a very long time. It's probably the majority opinion if I had to guess. A cancer upon $BTC.
⬡ Chris J retweeted
Excited to announce Pulse Conference 10,000x 🚀
One full day of the community telling the world about the greatest crypto ecosystem on the planet.
Enjoy talks and panels in a core-focused environment.
Speaker forms to submit for topics and availability for the conference coming likely within the next week.
Mark your calendars for October 9th, 2026 📅
More details to come!
⬡ Chris J retweeted
Time to waste some time saving Bitcoin guys again. This time, the lightning guys. Apparently "Core Lighting" has vulnerabilities that fixes aren't released for yet, so you should take your node offline until they are.
Also, why not use a real network, like PulseChain...
⬡ Chris J retweeted
What blockchain developers and people who love PulseChain should do:
1. Control your own destiny — host your own RPC
gitlab.com/pulsechaincom/pul…
2. Select known reliable public RPCs as fallbacks if your own node fails.
3. Prioritize official over community RPCs.
rpc.PulseChain.com
Trust is a huge factor.
Question why anyone hosts a free public RPC.
Whoever sees your transaction first gets the first shot at sandwiching it — or can simply choose not to forward it.
You don’t control the software they run or any modifications. You’re trusting them with your transaction.
Blockchain devs: RPC latency is a terrible way to pick your endpoint.
Why it's a weak signal:
→ Block times are ~10s. Shaving 11ms won't get your tx included any sooner.
→ TLS handshake is one-time. With keep-alives you pay it once.
What actually matters:
→ Fresh heads — no stale data
→ Accurate GPO — reliable gas estimates
→ Reliability under real load — not just acing health checks
The fastest RPC on your probe can still serve stale heads and fail real requests.
Be kind to your users.
⬡ Chris J retweeted
I know of a bridge where about $5.7b has traversed with no exploits and no funds lost. Yeah, it’s “slow” ~16 minutes, but that is only due to block finalization time. If that speeds up, then the bridge speeds up.
Don’t be fooled by other fast bridge tech.
defimon.xyz/blog/allbridge-h…
⬡ Chris J retweeted
‼️ WARNING ‼️
Incoming bullshit alert!!
“You can get higher gains than HEX by buying this token instead”
The usual suspects will come sliding out of the shadows to try to get you to buy their thing while they use the profit they make from dumping or rugging to buy RH Core for themselves.
REMEMBER:
You want the price of HEX and eHEX to be higher? Buy eHEX and HEX.
It’s that simple.
This is just a small example of tokens that most definitely rinsed most of their followers and leveled up their own RH Core positions at your expense. (And are now bigger sell pressure for your remaining RH core bags) Double whammy!
And I know many of these dudes and maybe they were genuine in their hopes of a better thing, but I’m guessing these kinds of founders came out ahead while those who followed them got rinsed.
⬡ Chris J retweeted
PulseChain is better than zcash $zec. Why? Well Zcash was just emergency patched, and the network down for many, because a vulnerability was discovered, and patched, but its impossible to know if it was ever exploited, unless an exploiter confessed. It's a funny property of most privacy coins, that you can't detect if someone inflation bug (minted a bunch of free coins) or not, because you can't actually count up the total supply.
PulseChain is safer software. Ethereum is PulseChain's testnet, and it's a wonderful test net!
⬡ Chris J retweeted
Ethereum, let me explain a bit how stupid you are. Instead of supporting me, who is rumored to hold lots and lots of ETH, you supported this piece of shit. You're sorry.
⬡ Chris J retweeted
PulseChain, PulseX, HEX, ProveX all have more potential for maximum gains than Bitcoin does, because BTC has a 1.6 Trillion dollar market cap already. It's been around for 17 years already. You are not an early adopter in $BTC.
Those 4 coins all do things that BTC can't.
PulseChain has better potential, better technology, higher throughput, lower fees, is more secure, and is less owned by governments and banks to boot.
HEX did a 10,000x in price in the last 10 years and doesn't make electricity companies and mining hardware manufacturers rich at the cost of the price.
PulseX removes middlemen from trading, its just you and the code.
ProveX uses zero knowledge tech to enable peer 2 peer trading and issue other kinds of proofs.
Better potential, better tech.
