I hate Trudeau & all he's done! Anti WEF, Anti-CR>!
Canada
Joined September 2019
- Tweets52.7K
- Following1.3K
- Followers749
- Likes50.5K
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
Everybody knows the deserts are expanding.
Everybody knows that climate change threatens our food supplies.
LIES. LIES. LIES. LIES. LIES. LIES.
The planet is greener, by an area 3x that of the Amazon. The Sahara is shrinking fast. Crops are thriving like never before.
Enough Net Zero posturing. Enough demoralizing the young.
To hell with the false prophets of environmental doom.
xitter.cf/jordanbpeterson/status…
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
This woman is a menace. She does not want to be peacefully raped by Muslim men. Islamophobia must be eradicated. - @PatinkinMandy
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
🚨 BREAKING: Looters are now BREAKING INTO HOMES in Paris — and it was only a matter of time
Absolutely NOBODY is coming to help the Parisians either.
This is why you NEVER give up your guns. The government will NOT be there for you.
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
What does a man who spent seventy five years living in his father’s tent have to do with the question you have been avoiding about your own life? In this lecture, Jordan Peterson works through the story of Abraham and arrives at the hardest passage in scripture, the moment a father is told to take his only son up a mountain and offer him as a burnt offering. The atheists call it proof of a monstrous God. Peterson thinks they have the story upside down, and getting to why takes him through a savings account, a sports team, a statue Michelangelo carved at twenty four, and the thing every mother does on the first day of school. Then a police officer asks him for one piece of advice, and the answer takes six minutes and costs Moses the promised land. By the end there is a calculation involving twenty minutes, fifty repetitions, and the two percent of your life you could fix this week. What Abraham is actually offered turns out not to be faith in the conventional sense at all, but a trade: everything you are comfortable with, in exchange for something you already know you want more.
This lecture was filmed on March 10, 2024, in Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
All those years ago, JFK knew. And he said it out loud. No wonder he was assassinated. Listen to this speech. He lays it out precisely & it is exactly what we are still facing today.
“We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice.”
Read that again. Monolithic. Ruthless. Conspiracy.
This wasn’t some fringe radio host. This was the sitting President of the United States, on live television, telling the American people that a shadow network of power — operating through intelligence agencies, media complicity, and institutional capture — was working against the republic itself.
And then he said the quiet part out loud:
“Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
Sound familiar?
🔥 TRUMP JUST REPOSTED JFK’S MOST TERRIFYING SPEECH — AND THE DEEP STATE IS PANICKING
JFK saw it coming. In 1961. And now, Trump has just made sure 300 million Americans see it, too.
The speech everyone’s talking about: Kennedy’s address to the American Newspaper Publishers Association, April 27, 1961. The CIA had just botched the Bay of Pigs. Kennedy was livid. He’d been lied to by his own intelligence apparatus. And he walked onto that stage and said something no president has dared say since.
“We are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence — on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice.”
Read that again. Monolithic. Ruthless. Conspiracy.
This wasn’t some fringe radio host. This was the sitting President of the United States, on live television, telling the American people that a shadow network of power — operating through intelligence agencies, media complicity, and institutional capture — was working against the republic itself.
And then he said the quiet part out loud:
“Its preparations are concealed, not published. Its mistakes are buried, not headlined. Its dissenters are silenced, not praised. No expenditure is questioned, no rumor is printed, no secret is revealed.”
Sound familiar?
Sixty-five years later, Trump drops this video on Truth Social. No commentary needed. The speech does all the work. And within hours, the same media outlets that spent four years calling Trump a conspiracy theorist are suddenly very quiet.
Here’s what they don’t want you to connect:
- Kennedy was assassinated 2.5 years after this speech
- The Warren Commission was a joke — even the House Select Committee on Assassinations in 1979 concluded Kennedy was “probably assassinated as a result of a conspiracy”
- The files are STILL classified
- Trump has been pushing to release them, but the permanent national security state refuses, instead slow-walking the order
The timing isn’t random. This isn’t just history. JFK described a permanent national security state that has only grown more entrenched — one that operates beyond elections, beyond accountability, beyond the reach of voters.
Kennedy called it “a system which has conscripted vast human and material resources into the building of a tightly knit, highly efficient machine that combines military, diplomatic, intelligence, economic, scientific, and political operations.”
That machine didn’t disappear when he died. It got even stronger.
Trump reposting this isn’t nostalgia. It’s a signal. The same forces JFK warned about are the same forces that tried to destroy Trump — Russiagate, two impeachments, lawfare, media blackout, assassination attempts. The playbook hasn’t changed. Only the names.
And now the sitting president just reminded the country who the real enemy has always been.
The speech that scared them then is the speech they’re terrified you’ll watch now.
Sharing this because they’re counting on you not to watch it. Don’t let them win. 🎯
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
Canada will become Paris if we continue down the path of allowing millions of invaders
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
Remember that time when Hillary Clinton introduced her friend George Soros and his interest to get involved in US elections?
The Internet sure doesn't.
Why?
Because it has been wiped from existence for the most part. Turns out I found a copy of the file I had archived years ago.
Be a real shame if people save and shared this widely.
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
She was 7 years old.
He ran into the driveway.
He picked her up.
He threw her to the ground.
He punched her.
And strangled her.
A judge just acquitted him.
He was too high.
Peak “Canadian justice”
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
🚨🚨THE MOST POWERFUL VIDEO YOU'LL SEE TODAY.
John Clauser, Nobel Prize in Physics and 1,500 more Scientists at Quantum Korea say:
"THERE IS NO Climate Change, THERE IS NO Climate Emergency"
Dr. Clauser Added: "The Climate Change narrative is a DANGEROUS CORRUPTION THAT THREATENS THE ECONOMY AT A GLOBAL LEVEL" ⚔️🔥
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
“And there is one final asymmetry, the one that ought to settle the matter once and for all. There is no flight from Europe by anyone—no community, no religious minority, no ethnic group, no political tendency—as a consequence of European far-right violence. No Muslims, no Jews, no atheists, no ex-Muslims, no gay men and women are packing suitcases in Frankfurt or Manchester or Marseille and applying for asylum in Cairo or Islamabad or Algiers because European far-right militants have made their lives untenable at home. The traffic runs, on a massive scale, in the opposite direction, and it has run in the opposite direction for two generations. Muslims, Christians, Yezidis, Baha’is, Ahmadiyyas, ex-Muslims, secularists, feminists, gay men and women, and religious minorities of every description are leaving the Muslim-majority world in millions, and they are coming to Europe and the rest of the West. They come because Europe, whatever else it is, is not governed by the doctrinal architecture they are fleeing. The presence of a European far right that occasionally shouts at them, or, at the violent extreme, produces a Breivik or a Tarrant, has not slowed the movement at all. If the two extremisms were symmetrical, the flow would also be symmetrical. It is not even close. The direction of migration by itself—that is, the votes of feet cast in their tens of millions by the very people who know both worlds—is a stronger empirical statement about the relative danger of the two phenomena than any Home Office report, academic study, or half-baked media essay will ever be.”
thefp.com/p/ayaan-hirsi-ali-…
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
Foreign Islamic nations like Kuwait and Saudi Arabia poured tens of millions into building massive mosques in NYC.
Now, voters are demanding prayer rooms in schools, strict religious laws, and total control.
Our country is being sold out from the inside. Wake up, America! 🇺🇸🚨
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
They told her it was freedom.
She stood in the square and said it on camera. The crowd had come night after night. The dictator was finished. Then the battery died, the lights on the crew went dark, and the men who had been cheering close enough to touch her said, in Arabic: “take her pants off.”
@laralogan did not understand the words. The Egyptian with her did. By the time she felt the first hands she was already inside it.
Not one man. A line of them. Breasts, crotch, behind. She screamed because she thought a scream still meant something. It made them worse. Someone yelled that she was an Israeli, a Jew. She is neither. But it did not matter. The word was enough.
They tore the sweater off. They tore the shirt to her neck. They ripped the metal off the bra. They shredded the pants and took the last of the cloth and they took pictures while they did it. Her cameraman had a sleeve left in his fist. She held his arm and thought she would die if she let go. They were beating her with sticks and flagpoles. She could not feel the wood. She could only feel the hands.
That was Tahrir on the night the West called a revolution. February 11, 2011. The same square. The same hour. The same men who had been sold to America as the face of a new birth. The match that turned a sexual assault into a killing frenzy was not a rumor about a government. It was the accusation that a woman might be a Jew.
They will tell you this was chaos, or war, or a few criminals in a crowd. It was a crowd that knew what it wanted the moment the camera stopped. Freedom, for them, included the right to strip a foreign woman in public and put their hands in her body while they photographed it. And the lie that made it holy was the oldest one in that part of the world.
Tahrir showed you the appetite. October 7 showed you the same appetite with the fence cut open and a plan.
In Cairo they tore the clothes off a reporter and filmed it because someone said Jew. In Israel they raped women in their homes and at a festival and filmed that too. Hamas led it. Civilians came through the breach behind the gunmen and joined the killing, the burning, the looting, the dragging of people back into Gaza. Some of them joined the sexual violence. Enough of them filmed it, cheered it, and treated Jewish women’s bodies as spoils.
One was a mob in a square the West called freedom. The other was a massacre the same West spent weeks struggling to say out loud.
She lived because one man did not let go. The ideology did not apologize. It waited for the next square, the next campus, the next morning when the word Jew is shouted and the hands come out again.
Nuremberg 2.0, 2000 Mules retweeted
"Si el hinduismo fuera tan bueno? ¿Por qué la gente no se va para la India. ¿Por qué no queremos abrir los ojos. Si Occidente cae - y se incluye a Hispanoamerica- ya no habrá otra América a donde huir. ¿Por qué no queremos abrir los ojos?
