☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo) header
☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo) profile picture

Sr UX Designer at Amazon Brand Experiences. Native  iOS Apps and Design Systems

New York City
Joined March 2008
Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)Photo by ☻ CΛT ☻ (@catlo)
We are not going back.
10,061
20,761
1,425
140,273
4,652,631
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
All PM templates from my Google Drive are now free for everyone 🎁 The extended edition: (1/4)
61
372
11
3,757
1,056,658
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
new wallpaper..
1,506
37,596
2,791
618,520
106,069,661
Born from 500+ designer profiles in Lovers Magazine, introducing Culture: Immersive company storytelling. Goodbye, dull career pages. Hire culturally aligned talent and discover transparent, product-led companies. spaces.is/culture
52
64
23
382
62,022
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
💎 Call to Action Button Decision Tree Use this decision tree as a guide to determine what Button should be used for your use case
3
62
356
23,377
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
Do not place your faith in playbooks Take this from a lover and writer of playbooks: they can never teach you how to do something hard. There are 4 reasons you should be suspicious of the teachings of any playbook or framework: Reason #1: It’s much easier to write a playbook than it is to do a hard thing. Thus, many playbooks are aspirational rather than experiential — "I wish it worked this way", rather than "this is what I know about how to make it work". To truly discern the difference, you’d need to know if the author of the playbook is indeed a master of their domain. Which means you’d need to know either the author extremely well, or the domain extremely well. Reason #2 (even if #1 is true): The ability to know something and the ability to explain it well are two different skills. To know how to do something difficult is rare; to know AND to be able to explain it well is even rarer. I have met numerous masters of their domains that are frequently right, but cannot explain why, because it is an intuition felt in the gut rather than a logical train of thought. Even those that do write a playbook may not write it in a way can be easily understood by non-experts — this is why so many books feel intimidatingly complex! Reason #3 (even if #2 and #3 are true): True knowledge of how to do something hard is too rich in depth and nuance to transfer to another person. The reality of how to do something hard is so complex as to be impossible to fully explain in a tweet, a diagram, a podcast, a class, or even a book. Human language is a lossy communication medium. So whatever you do read or see is generally a simplification of what the master knows—like a 6-D object transposed into 2-D. Reason #4 (even if all the above is true): Your exact context will be different and something the framework author probably does not have firsthand experience of. The world’s best instructions on how to get from the train station to Town Hall in London would simply not apply in Barcelona. -- That said, playbooks and frameworks are not entirely useless! They are incredibly powerful tools, for 3 reasons (and not necessarily the ones you think.) 1) A playbook / framework is an effective way of distilling complex knowledge for the author and their collaborators. The process of creating a framework forces reflection. The process of following a framework forces evaluation and iteration. 2) A playbook / framework is valuable as a handy reminder for others who have similar knowledge. Those folks have the depth of knowledge, and can rely on an elegant encapsulation in a simple 2x2 for easy recall. 3) A playbook / framework is useful is as persuasive evidence for action. If you need to convince others of something you already know but can’t explain well, you can use the framework as social proof. Alas, there are no shortcuts; the way to cross the chasm of expertise is not by applying someone else's formula, but by doing the the hard work of doing.
9
18
3
93
20,550
Attracting attention and attracting customers/clients are two different things.
7
5
52
3,899
My preferred software stack for running a creative studio. A fairly comprehensive, but simple list: 🧵
8
8
1
71
12,505
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
Neil Postman's questions for any new technology: - What problem does it solve? - Whose problem is it? - What new problems does it create? - Which people will be most impacted by it? - Which shifts in economic and political power will result? - What unintended uses will it have?
27
1
83
9,224
3 years later… i decided to remove all the fun caps for the numbers. LOL good run in mistyping them all the time. see more in thread below #keychron
1
3
351
When will designers be recognized for brains vs hands? We bring more to the table than craft. Our value is more than proficiency in a tool, but critical thinking. Innovation requires multiple vantage points. Yet majority of designers are not ready to accept that yet.
103
What do you do every Friday? Read here's what I do at the end of the week. faangboss.com/key-to-growth/
2
107
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
🎨 new technologies necessitate new interfaces with real-time latent consistency models, here’s a different kind of drawing app:
100
589
129
6,108
1,470,946
Me pumping up the dev team before I show them all of the animations
11
29
8
319
59,550
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
Anyone can now use DALL-E 3 to generate stunning product photos! Here are my top 3 Product photography compositions: 1. Front angle 2.Profile shot 3. Flat lay Prompt formula: (composition) (subject) (props) (background style) For this demo, I've chosen a Halloween-themed style! Let's fill in the blanks: 1/ front angle product shot of lipstick with pumpkin props, on a simple background 2/ profile product shot of perfume with pumpkin props, on a simple background 3/ flatlay product shot of lipstick with pumpkin props, on a simple background I hope you found this helpful! For more practical use cases and real-life applications, follow @Salmaaboukarr for more Next up, how to generate themed backdrops with DALL-E 3
46
76
3
726
318,226
Sunday read. This is hilarious. Engineers are competing who creates the worst UI on Reddit. I think the winners are: 1/ Enter your phone number
459
12,623
1,770
62,555
14,662,955
☻ CΛT ☻ retweeted
Can I suggest this little change?
1,167
122,763
3,120
522,095
20,340,557