Pinned Tweet
1/ Product leaders are still making bets in planning, waiting 6–18 weeks, and hoping they were right.
That cadence breaks when AI starts building faster.
OMNI helps leadership make decisions and steer product in real time.
We’re opening 5 spots in our Phase 2 pilot.
DM me if you want one 👇
🤖 Made with AI
cyrus.fun retweeted
ai startups aren’t competing against other ai startups. They’re competing against:
- the tracker sheet their team’s used for years
- the 5 open tabs needed for a task
- the copy-and-paste workflow nobody documented
- the employee who “just does it”
- ignorance, fear of change, laziness
Horrible advice. Humans should never test their own code, same should apply to agents.
Anthropic engineer:
"At Anthropic, 90% of our engineers use loops and ‘dreaming’ to build self-improving agentic systems.
сlose the agent loop. give an agent a way to verify its own output."
in a 30-minute session, an Anthropic team member explains how to build an agent that improves itself.
Claude + loops + dreaming + CLAUDE.md - that’s the secret.
Watch the talk, then save the playbook below.
Also this is creating a bottleneck of decisions needed to be made by leadership. Enter @omni3_ai to help orgs make decisions at the speed of AI delivery
Q: How are job postings for software engineers rising rapidly despite AI agents automating coding?
A: Because there’s far more code to manage than ever before. We’re already seeing a 14x YoY increase in GitHub commits, and it’s accelerating.
AI has dramatically lowered the cost of writing code, so it’s now being used across far more businesses, applications, and use cases.
We’re at the beginning of a massive productivity boom driven by the proliferation of bespoke software throughout the entire economy.
Coding has been AI’s breakout use case this year. The fact that it’s increased demand for software engineers — rather than decreased it — should call into question the entire “AI will cause mass job loss” narrative.
cyrus.fun retweeted
Q: How are job postings for software engineers rising rapidly despite AI agents automating coding?
A: Because there’s far more code to manage than ever before. We’re already seeing a 14x YoY increase in GitHub commits, and it’s accelerating.
AI has dramatically lowered the cost of writing code, so it’s now being used across far more businesses, applications, and use cases.
We’re at the beginning of a massive productivity boom driven by the proliferation of bespoke software throughout the entire economy.
Coding has been AI’s breakout use case this year. The fact that it’s increased demand for software engineers — rather than decreased it — should call into question the entire “AI will cause mass job loss” narrative.
3/ When humans build, every decision costs weeks of rework.
So you lock in roadmaps, hold the line, and don’t find out you were wrong until the next QBR.
But when AI builds, the math changes.
Build-and-verify cycles drop from quarters to hours.
4/ That means leadership stops watching from the sidelines and starts steering in real time.
✂️ Cut a feature → AI capacity redirects today 📈 Raise the bar on a spec → agents rewrite it tonight 🔁 A bet’s not paying off → reroute before the quarter is over
Leaders steer. AI executes.
That’s what we built OMNI to do.
amen
The easiest job in tech is Head of Growth at a consumer company with PMF.
I did it at Rappi and thought I was a genius.
Everything you try works.
Tweak onboarding → conversion jumps.
Unlock referrals → growth explodes.
Turn on paid → infinite scale.
And if something fails… it was an “experiment.”
But that’s a fallacy. It’s like losing weight on GLP-1 and thinking you mastered discipline.
Because when you become a founder, you realize the only hard growth problem is building a product people actually want.
I’m a growth person, but I have infinitely more admiration for 0→1 product people than 1→100 growth people.
cyrus.fun retweeted
ai god mode + privacy
1. Claude Code
2. This github.com/musistudio/claude…
3. Venice API: api.venice.ai/api/v1
4. DIEM
Connect these four things together and you can access free and pseudonymous inference on Opus 4.5 or any other leading model.
Config for 2 is below.
Have fun!
cyrus.fun retweeted
Bullish on Starknet
Bullish on Bitcoin
Bullish on Ethereum
Bullish on Zcash
Bullish on Blockchain
Bullish on ZK
Bullish on Freedom-tech
I was bullish yesterday
I'm bullish today
I'll be bullish tomorrow
true. self funding as long as you can is better.
most venture-backed companies end up in the same place:
raised 3-4M seed (or 10-15M series A)
built real product
got to 300-500K ARR (or 2-3M ARR)
VCs stopped caring
founders stuck with high pref stack, can't raise more, can't exit, can't even shut down cleanly
these aren't bad businesses
they're just wrong cap tables
the companies could throw off 500K-1M in profit annually
hire 2-3 more people and grow to 2-3M ARR
actually build something valuable
but they're trapped in venture math that doesn't work anymore
the discourse only covers two outcomes: unicorn or failure
nobody talks about the third path: decent business, wrong structure
thousands of quality founders stuck running companies VCs wrote off
not because they're bad operators
because they picked wrong market size or wrong cofounder or raised too early
Here’s a quick overview of our first RWA collectible (APxKAWS) launched on ACES.fun and a glimpse into what’s next as we continue to evolve the tech and roll out future launches.
With several RWAs already in the pipeline and gearing up for release, the journey has only just begun.
We keep building — on $ACES / ACES.fun.
Look man, I know we all gotta get our bags and achieve success... but there are better ways than this.
If you're truly building and you know you have a winner, ignore the noise and keep on signal and lean into your supporters.
