MD, PhD Mammography-induced cancers Medical science whistleblower https://xitter.cf/t.co/OrggmGwu0r https://xitter.cf/t.co/pDaq6Oavuc

Paris
Joined April 2018
Daniel Corcos retweeted
When I received a message from a former Trump administration official in August, asking me to meet with his team at a prestigious think-tank, I never could have imagined I was conversing with an Iranian intelligence agent. It was the start of a two-month sting - described by ASIO chief Mike Burgess as "sophisticated and targeted" - that ended with the notorious Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps gaining access to my personal emails and details in a major security breach. The message from a former senior Trump administration contact I forged through my Wuhan reporting, who has a prominent profile with hundreds of thousands of followers, came on August 18 this year. I had worked with him on my investigation into the origins of Covid-19. I trusted him and had met him in person during one of his visits to Australia. Unbeknownst to either of us, his genuine X account had been infiltrated by an Iranian operative, using the ‘delegate feature’ on X, which gives a third party access to manage and operate your account. Full story here: news24.com.au/politics/austr…
183
489
83
1,596
226,913
The Mind-Boggling Story of the The Remdesivir Cartel and the Gilead Team Inside the NIH Hospital COVID Protocols mothersarms.substack.com/p/t…
1
146
I remember the time where the Science was under attack. Back then, the Science was Fauci. Do you wish to replace him in that role? In my view, science is under attack when scientists are censored and debates are prohibited. You have a long way to go before you can claim to be a defender of science. It is high time to open a debate on the cancers caused by mammographic screening. It is now clear that those who refuse to engage in debate have your favor. Links in the following post. Please share. 1/2
1
2
6
334
Replying to @daniel_corcos
@PGtzsche1 claims to be a truth seeker and yet refuses to address the Evidence that Screening Mammography programs are inducing Approx as many Breast cancers as they detect This is a field he is very familiar with @DrLizaMD has said she will has an X space for an open civil debate and discussion between you and @PGtzsche1
2
2
57
Daniel Corcos retweeted
Let's get it organized. We're happy to host it.
1
1
50
Daniel Corcos retweeted
. @AshleyRindsberg (writing for his @NPOVmedia) is back with another exposé of wiki-corruption. The 200-page report is damning. It proves in detail how despicably abusive one group of Wikipedia editors have been in pushing their revisionist propaganda. Thread 👀🧵
28
42
7
74
3,581
Daniel Corcos retweeted
Replying to @PGtzsche1
@PGtzsche1 @daniel_corcos What say you both??? Women need the facts Women need a safe screening test Why hasn't this debate and discussion on the evidence happened yet????? @DrJMarine @sethmhardy @LocasaleLab please publicize
I would like to hear a civil discussion about this topic & would be willing to host a space that covers both sides.
1
2
2
119
Daniel Corcos retweeted
I would like to hear a civil discussion about this topic & would be willing to host a space that covers both sides.
Replying to @daniel_corcos
@PGtzsche1 claims to be a truth seeker and yet refuses to address the Evidence that Screening Mammography programs are inducing Approx as many Breast cancers as they detect This is a field he is very familiar with @DrLizaMD has said she will has an X space for an open civil debate and discussion between you and @PGtzsche1
6
2
1
8
916
Daniel Corcos retweeted
Replying to @DrLizaMD
@DrLizaMD @camjenglish @daniel_corcos has agreed to a debate and discussion on your wonderful science X spaces on the topic of Screening mammography -ionizing radiation -the evidence that they are inducing approx as many breast cancers as they detect Open challenge to @PGtzsche1 -who knows this field well -and published about Overdiagnosis as the problem with mammograms
I am open to this debate. Please share widely. #mammographycausescancer
1
1
3
127
I am open to this debate. Please share widely. #mammographycausescancer
Replying to @daniel_corcos
@PGtzsche1 claims to be a truth seeker and yet refuses to address the Evidence that Screening Mammography programs are inducing Approx as many Breast cancers as they detect This is a field he is very familiar with @DrLizaMD has said she will has an X space for an open civil debate and discussion between you and @PGtzsche1
1
1
5
323
He does not want to debate. That makes him a liar.
Replying to @PGtzsche1
way past time to debate and discuss the solid and elegant work of @daniel_corcos on mammography( ionizing radiation -a potent and undisputed carcinogen) inducing approx as many breast cancers as it detects The tragedy ??? that safe screening modalities already exist we need you voice
1
2
4
366
Just a reminder that Peter Gotzsche @PGtzsche1 is a liar. xitter.cf/daniel_corcos/status/1…
The Fraud of Breast Cancer Overdiagnosis This thread is the most comprehensive and educational I've done on the subject. If you find it valuable, please RT. 🧵
1
1
321
Daniel Corcos retweeted
How Wikipedia Buried the Truth About Covid Inside Wikipedia’s six-year editorial battle to frame lab leak as a partisan ‘conspiracy,’ and to manufacture consensus about one of the most important scientific questions of our time piratewires.com/p/how-wikipe…
3
43
3
134
4,161
Incredibly, creditors of China Evergrande Company are now coming after Harvard to claw back the donation. The FT reported on Friday liquidators are attempting to recoup $2m of the $14m donation made by Evergrande to Harvard Medical School. I broke the story in May 2022 for @TheSpectator showing that, according to public disclosures, Harvard Medical School's dean, George Daley, approached Fauci at the very beginning of the pandemic. Daley requested that Fauci with Evergrande's CEO to discuss "pandemic response." Days later, Evergrande pledged $114 million to Harvard Medical School. Daley spent the following months praising China's pandemic efforts, including its transparency. Months later, Evergrande reneged on the donation. It then imploded amid China's real estate crash. Its founder, who is deeply connected to the CCP – and personally led the company's Party "cadre" – was imprisoned for life. Fauci appears to have taken the meeting with Evergrande's CEO on Feb 3, 2020 – just two days after the fateful conference call with leading virologists about the origin of COVID.
One of the most underreported stories of Covid corruption is how, at the outset of the pandemic, as Fauci was launching his origins cover up, the Chinese used the now bankrupt Evergrande Group as a vehicle to establish a secret backchannel to Fauci through a donation to Harvard. To this day, we still don't know what the Chinese wanted from Fauci, what he told them, or why nobody seems interested in finding out. It's a totally bizarre story.
5
58
4
202
14,731
Daniel Corcos retweeted
Replying to @AdinHaykin1
Yes, the CIA did secretly fund the American Friends of the Middle East (AFME), a pro-Arab anti-Zionist group founded in 1951 by CIA officer Kermit Roosevelt (with Aramco support). It aimed to counter pro-Israel influence and was exposed by Ramparts in 1967. Historians like Hugh Wilford document this, plus coordination with the anti-Zionist American Council for Judaism. State Department Arabists shared similar views and worked with such groups in the late 1940s, though direct State funding is less clear.
4
42
3
217
5,792
"la mortalité par cancer et l’incidence des cancers à un stade avancé, bien qu’elles soient influencées par des traitements toujours plus efficaces, sont moins sensibles aux changements de pratiques de détection." La détection précoce diminue la mortalité et l'incidence des cancers à un stade avancé. Si ça ne marche pas pour le cancer du sein, c'est parce que la mammographie cause des cancers. Lien ci-dessous RT SVP 1/
📰Épidémies apparentes de cancer : comment les pratiques de détection biaisent la surveillance (SPS 357) Un article d'Arnaud Chiolero, Frerik Smit, Axelle Braggion et Stefano Tancredi, accessible sur afis.org/Epidemies-apparente…
1
5
1
4
497
Ma présentation sur les cancers causés par les mammographies à l'Institut Cochin (Paris). 🧵 1/
1
1
83
Shi (Bat Woman) a inventé la séquence du coronavirus RaTG13 pour effacer les traces de l'origine du virus en laboratoire. Ce qui signifie qu'elle est directement à l'origine du virus. Cette chercheuse chinoise effectuait des expériences sur les coronavirus en collaboration avec des scientifiques américains (projet DEFUSE). 1/
Replying to @mattwridley
This is science. You don't have to believe or not believe in the possibility that the Chinese fabricated RaTG13. Like with most crime cases, at some point the lies just start to contradict each other. We have shown in our preprint the mutation frequency is highly suspicious. @gadboit2 just re-calculated the odds that these type IIs sites in RaTG13 evolved naturally. The rounded probability is 0.000000. The WIV fucked up an intended cover up operation so badly that we now know they were involved. Without that, just based on the SARS2 genome, it would have been impossible to know involved labs. xitter.cf/VBruttel/status/211227…
2
15
1
32
830
En Février 2020, une banque chinoise en faillite s'est engagée à verser 115 millions de dollars à l’université Harvard pour la recherche sur le Covid. En Mars 2020, Fauci (chef de la biodéfense US et ami d'Yves Lévy) et Farrar (Wellcome Trust) faisaient publier dans Nature Medicine une étude frauduleuse affirmant que SARS-CoV-2 ne provenait pas d'une fuite de laboratoire. xitter.cf/HansMahncke/status/211… @AshleyRindsberg 2/
One of the most underreported stories of Covid corruption is how, at the outset of the pandemic, as Fauci was launching his origins cover up, the Chinese used the now bankrupt Evergrande Group as a vehicle to establish a secret backchannel to Fauci through a donation to Harvard. To this day, we still don't know what the Chinese wanted from Fauci, what he told them, or why nobody seems interested in finding out. It's a totally bizarre story.
1
4
122