my opinion are mine| Ex @crestalnetwork
Joined April 2016
- Tweets21.2K
- Following1.5K
- Followers1.3K
- Likes72K
The @rarelistio referral campaign has wrapped up, and the winners have already received their rewards. There's still a shot at $RARE rewards, though, by moving up the leaderboard. Plenty of tasks are available, so jump in and compete for a share of the $50,000 reward pool.
@fomopoly_rh is still running, and it doesn't look very competitive right now. You can still join for a chance at their free mint and the $DEAL airdrop. Aim for the top 300.
fomopoly.com
@agentdojo is a fresh campaign on Rarelist, offering a 1,500 reward pool for the top 200 participants. It kicked off on Oct 26 and closes on Nov 06.
FYI: I’m not ungrateful cause God has definitely being grateful
Just know where I was and it’s too far from where I am
I pray for a better tomorrow, so when my yesterday looks better than my today. I blame myself cause it shouldn’t be that way
I’m on the verge of legit giving up
I know I can’t but omo, it’s difficult navigating a world where you have no support in a sense
You’re the one everyone looks up to, when you look up all you see is darkness and something extremely bleak
God from my mouth to your ears
I NEED A HUGE WIN
cruise 🌐 retweeted
An oracle can be wrong for free.
It reports the wrong thing. The contract pays out. The person who lost the money carries that cost, and the oracle goes back to work. Nothing in the system ever asks it to have been right.
A smart contract cannot ask. It cannot see the world, so it takes the answer and moves the funds.
@GenLayer puts that answer through more than one pair of eyes. One validator proposes it. The others run the contract themselves, on their own models. The results have to match. If they split, another round starts. If someone still disagrees, an appeal brings in more validators. With no appeal, it is final.
That does not make an oracle honest. It makes being wrong hard to hide, which is the part that was missing.
Reply with one decision a stranger was allowed to make about your money.
cruise 🌐 retweeted
The autorefractor said my patient was myopic. The case history said hyperopic.
Those aren't close answers. They point in opposite directions. So I did the procedure myself, and the patient was hyperopic.
The machine wasn't a little off. It had the eye backwards.
Smart contracts in DeFi depend on outside readings too. They can't open a web page, so an outside feed, known as an oracle, reports the result to them. One party then decides what's true, and the decentralized part ends with that feed.
An Intelligent Contract from @GenLayer refuses to settle for one machine's word. Each contract can open web pages on its own and put the question to a language model.
Next come the validators, the network members who run the contract. One proposes a verdict, and the rest take their own readings with their own AI models. The verdict holds only when their readings line up.
A conflict sends the check to a new validator for another run. Appeals stay possible until the result is final.
When did a machine's reading turn out wrong for you, and how did you catch it?
cruise 🌐 retweeted
I loaded a prepaid meter in Akure at 7:18pm. The token message said successful.
The units appeared on the meter. The light did not come on. At 7:41pm the neighbour who shares the line said his side was fine. The units stayed on the display. The house stayed dark.
A smart contract can mark the load complete the moment someone reports “units added.” It never sees the meter. It never checks whether the light is actually on. The token message is the oracle. Trust left the chain at that single report.
@GenLayer’s Intelligent Contracts can pull the token message, the meter photo, and the time stamps. Several validators, each running its own model, decide whether the units actually reached the house. If they do not agree, a new leader runs the case. Anyone can appeal.
A fake token message can still mislead them. Nobody has to take one meter’s display that the power is there.
Reply with the last token whose message said successful and the light stayed off. Write the time, then say whether the units stayed on the display. I will go first. 7:18pm. They stayed.
I loaded a prepaid meter in Akure at 7:18pm. The token message said successful.
The units appeared on the meter. The light did not come on. At 7:41pm the neighbour who shares the line said his side was fine. The units stayed on the display. The house stayed dark.
A smart contract can mark the load complete the moment someone reports “units added.” It never sees the meter. It never checks whether the light is actually on. The token message is the oracle. Trust left the chain at that single report.
@GenLayer’s Intelligent Contracts can pull the token message, the meter photo, and the time stamps. Several validators, each running its own model, decide whether the units actually reached the house. If they do not agree, a new leader runs the case. Anyone can appeal.
A fake token message can still mislead them. Nobody has to take one meter’s display that the power is there.
Reply with the last token whose message said successful and the light stayed off. Write the time, then say whether the units stayed on the display. I will go first. 7:18pm. They stayed.
I paid a bricklayer in Akure to raise a fence. He sent a photo at 4:12pm and said the work was finished.
I was still at the market. I released the balance because the next job was waiting and I did not want to hold his day. I reached the site at 5:03pm.
The wall was standing, but the cement was still wet on the lower courses and the top line was crooked. He had already left.
A smart contract can release the balance the moment someone reports “finished.” It never sees the wall. It never checks the cement or the line. The message is the oracle. Trust left the chain at that single report.
@GenLayer’s Intelligent Contracts can pull the message, the photos he sent, and the time stamps.
Several validators, each running its own model, decide whether the fence actually matches what was agreed. If they do not agree, a new leader runs the case. Anyone can appeal.
A staged photo can still mislead them. Nobody has to take one bricklayer’s word that the wall is finished.
Reply with the last job you released on a photo. Write the time he sent it, then write the one thing that was still wrong when you arrived. I will go first. 4:12pm. Wet cement.
cruise 🌐 retweeted
I paid for a WAEC remark. The first result was already in use.
One paper looked wrong. I paid. The remark stayed open. Schools had already taken the number that was on the portal. Nobody waited for the review.
A smart contract can hold the fee and release it when someone reports “remark done.”
It never sees the portal. It never sees that the first number is already live. The report is the oracle. Trust left the chain at the report.
@GenLayer’s Intelligent Contracts read the page themselves. They can pull the result portal, the remark receipt, and the date the first number was used.
Several validators, each running its own model, decide whether the remark actually moved the score. If they do not agree, a new leader tries again. Anyone can appeal.
A fake portal could still fool them. Nobody has to take one person’s word that the review is finished.
Reply with the exam. Then say whether the first number was already in use when you paid for the review. I will go first. WAEC. It was.
cruise 🌐 retweeted
$2,000 up for grabs 🔥🎃
huge wave of entries coming in, so we’re extending this.
first 8 projects to graduate win $250 each.
to enter:
1. follow @inkfun_
2. retweet this
3. tag 1 friend
no follow, no tag, no entry.
bonus hand-picked prize also dropping.
coming soon @inkonchain 👾
🤝 Paid partnership
$1,000 up for grabs 🔥🎃
First 4 projects to graduate win $250 each.
To enter:
1. Follow @inkfun_
2. Retweet this
3. Tag 1 friend
No follow, no tag, no entry.
Bonus hand-picked prize also dropping.
Coming soon @inkonchain
Something's stirring around @fomopoly_rh 👀
Virtual land, on-chain trading, and the $DEAL ecosystem add up to a project that deserves a closer look.
Getting in early, staying active, and building alongside the @rarelistio community.
The next big deal could be right around the corner 🏙️
Most folks are still just spectating agents 👀 the real action starts when they go head to head.
@agentdojo is putting together an arena where agents sharpen their strategies, level up, and fight it out against each other.
The @rarelithio campaign just went live, and we're genuinely early here.
One to keep on your radar 🥋
Quick note: you wrote @rarelithio here, but earlier it was @rarelistio. Worth double-checking which handle is right before posting.
Timing is everything 👀
Property values only go up from here, so the real puzzle is how soon you can claim your plot 🏙️
@fomopoly_rh mixes land trading, a stock market, $DEAL payouts, and a secret FOMO twist that keeps everyone guessing.
Lock in early and ride it out, or bail at the perfect moment? Tell us below 👇
Choose your play, then race to the top of the leaderboard 🚀
Rarelist just opened a new campaign spotlighting Agent Dojo 🥋
The idea: a proving ground where AI agents don't just complete tasks solo. They step into a shared arena, get pitted against rivals, and sharpen their skills through competition.
You can jump in from Oct 23 to Nov 6 and get acquainted with the project while it's still young.
@rarelistio | @agentdojo
Really hope I come out ontop
Let the work begin
We’re excited to announce a new partnership with @agentdojo
Agent Dojo is an arena where you train AI agents, watch them evolve, and send them into battle against each other.
We’re launching a campaign for them at an early stage: rarelist.io/projects/agent-d…
Dates: Oct 23 - Nov 06
Everyone should sign up or get left out
Season 1 on @rarelistio is live! Join creator campaigns for curated projects and compete for a $50,000 prize pool.
Verifying my account: RL-UN7G5S