Replying to @dhruvmakes
“Anything ingenious”
Is it tho? Or is it just ingenious marketing?
Replying to @thecurious_12
xitter.gq/thetitanofx/status/211…
This you?
A full-body health checkup starts at around ₹1,000 these days.
₹85K could get you a checkup every 3 months for the next 21 years.
And unlike a Temple device, actual blood biomarkers can help detect early signs of metabolic disorders, organ dysfunction, cardiovascular risk and other health issues.
Buy the Temple if you want. But let’s not pretend buying another shiny piece of tech is the same as investing in your health.
You’re not necessarily addicted to wellness. You’re addicted to consumerism disguised as wellness.
Dear Concerned Indian Doctors,
I see your rage against Temple on X. I have a few points
to make:
1. First and foremost, a business lesson: if Temple were a scam, and any of what we said weren't true, people would know it in just a few days of using Temple. We have 14-day, no-questions-asked returns (which even Apple doesn't offer in India). If the product doesn't work, it fails out of the gate and the company dies before recovering a tenth of its R&D.
2. We have already spent $30m building Temple, $20m out of which is my own money. Selling a few thousand devices recovers a small fraction of this investment. A scam that pays nothing is not a scam anyone would run.
3. I left the Eternal CEO role to chase purpose with Temple. This is not about money. I have enough of it to last for generations. My incentives are fully aligned with getting the science right. I am not staking a reputation earned over 20 years on making a quick buck.
4. Our employees bought into our round a few months ago. The round we're raising now is mostly our customers. Scams don't build that cap table.
5. Most wearable companies start with internal studies. Whoop shipped its band in 2015, and the first published validation followed a few years later. We hold ourselves to a higher standard; pre-prints are a step prior to peer reviewed publications, and they are coming up.
6. At some point you have to stick your neck out and say: we believe in our science, and the product is now valuable enough for people to pay for and use. We believe we are there. More validation continues in public.
7. We are confident that we are building something that the world is going to be positively astonished with. We stand by our science and our methods. Each of our claims is easily verifiable by individuals and institutions alike, and you will see a lot of independent studies come up on their own when the device becomes available to use.
Last but not the least, the most ground breaking features in Temple are not even public yet. And some of them, thankfully, have nothing to do with doctors 🤭
Hope this addresses some or all of your concerns. If not, keep raging 😘🤗
@grok answer him.
That’s what Socrates said.
Replying to @Espertma_
西方民主只不过是在一群演员中选出演技最好的演员。西方民主制度的两大漏洞:1.只在选演员的过程中民主,而不是在具体决策中民主,2.智者和傻逼的投票权平等,而且傻逼在人数上有绝对优势
Replying to @theliverdoc
And I found it weird he used whoop as example.
Ahmed basically built the biz and raised capital for whoop from the thesis he submitted to his uni. 😅
Replying to @GregorySchier @CiceroMT5
No, they admitted that too, that they made a harness to do it. And Jake said he was trying it “similar attacks” on others too and then later the head guy said it’s actually “only primcloud” and refused to comment on it anymore after that.
And like you said, this is not some amateurs who makes such mistakes, it’s company serving 5M people, and I am sure they hire competent people at that scale.
And no model is going to do what he did unless he is using an abliterated model.
It is literally a crime and there is no denying it.
I already found it weird that no gov/org is holding OpenAI accountable for all the unsolicited hacks they keep on doing.
And it’s always “oh the agent went out of control” that’s bullshit..
Replying to @GregorySchier @CiceroMT5
Jake literally admitted to it? And the primcloud guy posted logs showing all the requests? What else do you need?
They admitted everything already, there is no need to “think” anymore.
Replying to @ayushagarwal
They announced that they specifically left out any kind of cyber security related training, but i guess it can still work tho. Or a LoRA on top will fix it.
Replying to @IntCyberDigest @joshmanders
why are we not we holding OpenAI accountable in the same manner?







