Australian born doctor, specialist anaesthesiologist (retired). Proponent of Evidence Based Medicine, Covid Early Treatment & "Vax" safety.
Sydney, Bondi Beach
Joined September 2012
- Tweets14.6K
- Following1.8K
- Followers22.2K
- Likes19.8K
Pinned Tweet
DARPA knew Ivermectin and Hydroxychloroquine would cure Covid, and were safe and effective.
So did I.
The Australian regulators suspended my medical licence 3rd Sept 2021 for daring to inform my fellow Australians ( and defying their gag order on physicians )
@CShoemakerMD @PierreKory @PrisonPlanet @doctorcole @greggutfeld @TuckerCarlson @scientificecon @AMPS_RedUnion @nzdsos @joerogan @lexfridman @TopherField @therealrukshan @thecoastguy @KimDotcom @DrJohnCampbell3 @chrismartenson @Jikkyleaks @RWMaloneMD @lawrie_dr @KimDotcom @BretWeinstein @RealJamesWoods @P_McCulloughMD @TopherField @ScottAdamsSays
Are We Watching the Orchestrated Destruction of France? xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1oJMvNoVD…
Live now!
The COST OF THINKING DIFFERENTLY, Dr Mark and Sam Bailey. The Vaccine Skeptics xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1nxeLMgwD…
The COST OF THINKING DIFFERENTLY, Dr Mark and Sam Bailey. The Vaccine Skeptics xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1nxeLMgwD…
Join Brian Melder who is back in the Defiant Cafe, Cafe Locked Out xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1nGnRBDPO…
This is about the right to say No,
The Australian Immunisation Handbook requires that vaccination consent be voluntary and free from undue pressure, coercion or manipulation.
I believe No Jab, No Play ...
( take the full schedule or no childcare, or preschool for you ) is undue pressure, and coercion
and the No Jab, No Pay is a manipulation.
Thank you @JohnRuddick2 for bringing this Bill.
Conscientious Objection: Driven by conscience.
#BringBackConscientiousObjection
@RosieM1276203 @AaronSiriSG @stkirsch @chrismartenson @Jikkyleaks @MaryanneDemasi @TopherField @JohnLarter000 @cafelockedout @delbigtree
@JohnRuddick2 the rally to stop mandates for our children to attend childcare will be at 6 pm on 10/11/26 outside NSW parliament. Come and have your say.
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
He's right. The @AusFedPolice decided to put their resources into surveilling someone who was never a threat, for political reasons.
Well, it wasn't the AFP. It was one person at the AFP that decided the political points were worth it.
Then people died.
@TonyNikolic10
Wolstencroft The Third xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1yJAPwZvL…
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
NEWS/OPINION | The Helen Haines Attack Exposes a Political Pattern in Australia | The real danger exposed by the Haines attack isn’t online extremism — it’s political opportunism.
Massive uptick in breast cancer in younger women in starting in 2022 ..
I have been calling out culprit since 2021 :
Coincidence™
Brought to you by The $cience™
@jimmy_dore @AwakenWithJP @Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaks @DJSpeicher @chrismartenson
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
This is a bombshell.
Not because @GovCanHealth had to release these documents, but that they consider the public (you) such peasants that, when busted for covering up a cancer scandal, they continue to cover up.
The redactions here almost certainly document criminal malfeasance.
The people involved in the inaction here, the lack of communicating this to the public AND the FOI officer who continues to redact these documents, need prosecuting.
People died.
The public should have had a choice to know what was in these products.
#plasmidgate @Kevin_McKernan @MaryanneDemasi @SenRonJohnson @SecKennedy @P_McCulloughMD
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
Let me offer counterpoint to @rubin_allergy
If your first instinct after hearing about Jalen Hurts DVTs bilaterally in lungs ISN’T to blame the COVID shots, you are a dangerous excuse for a clinician.
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
In 1837, the US president, who had run on the ticket to abolish the central bank and won the election, actually did abolish the central bank. For a quarter century there were no regulations concerning banking. Thousands of banks were created. The economy delivered high economic growth for decades, overtaking the leading economic power, the UK, by 1900.
The freest banking era in American history also delivered the most stable prices Americans ever experienced, and the federal government had almost nothing to do with it.
Between 1837 and 1863, the United States operated without a central bank after Andrew Jackson killed the Second Bank of the United States. Jackson understood monetary economics better than every Federal Reserve chairman combined, despite his inability to read a balance sheet.
What actually happened? Hundreds of competing state-chartered banks issued their own notes. Suffolk Bank in Boston built a private clearinghouse network that disciplined reckless lenders without a single bureaucrat collecting a salary to do it. Banks that over-issued notes faced redemption pressure from competitors. Imagine that: accountability enforced by markets instead of congressional testimony nobody acts on.
The price level in 1863 sat roughly where it sat in 1837. This represents 26 years of near-zero inflation. The Fed has destroyed over 96% of the dollar's purchasing power since 1913.
Critics called free banking chaotic because bank runs happened. Bank runs also happen under central banking (IndyMac, 2008), except now you get to bail out the gamblers with your tax dollars. The chaos argument collapses the moment you ask who pays for the "stability." You pay. Every year. Through currency depreciation that never appears on any bill the government sends you.
YOU ARE HERE? The CLO QUIZ SHOW #26 xitter.cf/i/broadcasts/1dGYlarRX…
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
Hero @TracyBethHoeg calling out what many of us know. It’s pervasive now, yet proven and safe therapeutics remain out of consideration when it threatens established, less effective therapeutics manufactured by heavyweight-pharma, I can attest.
During her talk at Rutgers, @TracyBethHoeg highlighted a scandal that has received no media attention. The FDA approved Avacopan (Tavneos) based on manipulated clinical trial data. The drug has been linked to 8 deaths. Just 18 days after Høeg moved to withdraw its approval, she was fired and the drug remains on the market.
Paul Oosterhuis 🐭 retweeted
Europeans,
Seeing what is going on in France, I have just one question:
Do you get it now?
This isn’t going to get better on its own. Sign the @SaveEuropeAct
" The Basel Committee de-industrialised the countries that adopted its rules. It's that simple "
@LukeGromen @scientificecon @chrismartenson @DavidBCollum @TuckerCarlson
I spent 35 years building banking systems for banks worldwide, including central banks. I know how banks decide where their money goes.
When you build systems, you have to make them work, so you have to know how they work.
The Basel Committee de-industrialised the countries that adopted its rules. It's that simple: I explain the whole complicated mechanism in my essay. They simply regulated it away because that was the most profitable thing to do. It was implemented in such a systemic global way, and nobody seemed to notice
Capital is what a bank must hold before it can lend, the way a manufacturer or miner must hold supplies before it can sell. No miner doubles their costs to serve one group of customers. But that's what the banking system does to miners and manufacturers. Since 1988, the Basel rules have required banks to hold twice the capital against a factory loan as against a home loan, and under Basel III the gap reaches five times. So banks lend less to industry and more against houses. It should be stopped tomorrow.
Manufacturing's share of GDP fell in ten of the eleven countries I examined. In Australia it fell from 13.7% to 5.4%. Every other country that followed fell as well. The only truly crafty ones were the Koreans, who did a good job of offsetting it.
Regulators were warned in writing that the rule would steer credit, and they adopted it anyway. No parliament voted for it, and it's simply too dumb to keep doing, but we do . Not today; there is no justification. Yet from India, across Europe, across the US, including Australia, sanctions against industrial capacity. Financialization has gone too far it needs to be reviewed .
The charge is manslaughter by gross negligence. The mechanism is proven.
Same Rules, Different Ruins:ctindale.substack.com/p/same…