Dridhaprahara

I'd rather live as an avarna with my dignity intact than beg some ponga gatekeepers to acknowledge me as a Kshatriya. Stop chasing their validation. Stop whining, “But muuh chhatri, saar!” Our self-respect shouldn't depend on their approval. Dignity over validation. Self-respect over status.

Māuryas of Magaḍha descended as Rājāputs in many parts of the Country but certainly not in Māharāṣṭra, no inscription found claims descend from Candrāgupta but instead they claim Descent from Vallabhī Māuryas. As for the Irrelevant Moré Claim, it has no substance whatsoever.

Maurya descendants are Maratha Morey/More today, Meanwhile why these contemporary horse and toilet cleaner Biharis are even allowed to utter their names, that is true blasphemy tbh.

I gone through 450+ inscriptions transcripts in last few years-clearly highlight Seunas of devagiri are pure kannada origin, kannadigas, They hold Pure Kannada names, Titles-ಕರ್ಣಾಟರಾಯವಂಶಾಭಿರಾಮಂ: (The pride/beauty of the Karnāṭa royal lineage)Share and Repost💛❤️ Follow for More

According to the 17th century Chronicles of Mewar report, the Guhilās Sisodiaya were originally Brāhmans who later, after receiving Kshatriyahood the power and brilliance of a Kshātriya from Rishi Hārita, began to establish themselves in the form of Kshatriyas. हारीतराशिमुनियुगवपादमयसेवाप्त सभ्यगप्रसादवरप्रसाद्रः However, until the 18th century they had not forgotten their Brāhman origin. Along with this, they also presented the view from Nāinsi si ki Khyat, but they reject this inferior claim because it narrates an identical story for both Bāppa Rawal and Guhadatta that both were adopted by Brahmins for which there is no authentic or contemporary evidence. The Brahmin origin of the Guhils was wellknown among the public until the 20th century. To refute this, G.H. Ojha was put forward, but he displayed gold coins belonging to someone else, linked them to Bappa Rawal, and by showing a sun engraved on the coins, declared him Suryavansha. He distorted the meaning of Vipra, turned Vipra into learned king and Mahideva into lord of the earth then in what way did he describe Guhadatta as a devotee of Brahmins? विप्रक्षिप्रतरप्रबोधमधुरानदैकतिष्ठः आनंदपुरविनिर्गतविप्रकुलानन्दो All his hollow claims were refuted by Banerji in his book, and Ojha himself also accepted it. Ojha accused Bhandarkar of mistranslating the lines of the inscription. But Ojha has never explained to this day on what basis he interpreted ब्रह्मक्षत्रन्वितो भतृमहो BrāhmaKshatra Rama to mean Dasharatha’s Rama, because in no text is Dasharatha’s Rama called BrāhmaKshatra. When the truth still could not be hidden even with all these hollow claims, then the kings of Mewar resorted to a new tactic to conceal their Brahmin origin. The Brāhman origin of Bappa was not forgotten as late as the reigning period of Rana Fateh Singh of the 20th century A.D. During his period Maulvi Abdul Farhati in his Tojai Rajasthan mentioned in clear terms that Ranas of Mewar were originally Brāhmans. Unfortunately the book was proscribed by the then Government of Mewar. Such attempts of suppressing the true facts suggest that the destruction of the 2nd slab was also a deliberate action of some body who did not like to see such records exist. However, from the above discussion and circumstances I reach to the conclusion that the fact of Brahman origin recorded in the slab may not be taken as a last word until some other contemporary evidence is made available; it at least keeps little space for the interpretation of the words Dvija or Vipra as attempted by Dr. Ojha.