The eQuality Project retweeted
“Perhaps consuming a few dozen book pages a day should become the new 10,000 daily steps — a basic foundation of activity to maintain cognitive fitness.”
nytimes.com/2026/03/27/opini…
The eQuality Project retweeted
What's wrong with writing with AI?
Alain deBotton says: "I don't just write to produce a certain numbers of words. I write in order to honor certain feelings, and AI can't know those feelings because it's not me.
It doesn't know what I want to say. And if I simply give my writing over to AI, it will crush my nascent sense about what it is I really want to say."
Alain de Botton has written ~17 books and runs the School of Life YouTube channel, which now has almost 10 million subscribers. And this is a rare interview for him.
Some highlights:
1. A clear night sky is a challenge to everything we think we know.
2. If we really took on board what that night sky is telling us, we'd have to lie down and just question absolutely everything.
3. Writer's block is a conflict between shame and the desire for honesty.
4. The effect of mass media is to industrialize and commercialize our thinking, which leaves no room for the free thinker, the honest thinker, and the authentic thinker.
5. You've got to be attentive to your own sensations and thoughts. That's the real work of writing.
6. Every person is an incredible library of sensations but so often, particularly in the academic world, people think: “Let’s ignore ourselves as a source of data and find out what Cicero said, or what Socrates said, or what Michel Foucault said."
7. Writing can be revenge for the silenced person, which is why so many writers are meek in person but fierce on the page.
8. A work of art is the best thing you can do with your dislocation and distress, and sometimes, it’s even an alternative to losing your mind.
9. Emerson said: "In the minds of geniuses, we find our own neglected thoughts."
10. The thoughts of geniuses aren’t fundamentally different from others. It’s just that they’re able to put words to sensations we’ve long felt but couldn’t articulate.
11. Writing prompt: If there were no rules, if you couldn't fail, if no one was going to laugh, if you were going to be dead tomorrow, what would you actually do and say? How would you write, let's say? That's the thing you should write.
I've shared the full conversation with Alain de Botton below. You can watch here or on YouTube, and listen on Apple or Spotify. You'll find the links in the reply tweets.
The eQuality Project retweeted
This might surprise younger people but in the ‘90s most of us knew how to read & were culturally literate. You could mention King Arthur or Citizen Kane and everyone knew what you meant. We were capable of writing essays. We had educational TV. We have lost so much, so quickly.
The eQuality Project retweeted
Penguin Random House sued OpenAI today for alleged copyright infringement.
They say ChatGPT generated text and images “virtually indistinguishable from” one of their children’s books.
The side by side comparison is quite something
theguardian.com/technology/2…
The eQuality Project retweeted
It's has been tested and shown now that "AI" is less than 1% - in fact less than 0.4% - on its way towards Human Level Intelligence (AGI).
Please share to help stop the AI industry hype and the lies that are damaging our societies.
This Post is from a suspended account. Learn more
The eQuality Project retweeted
45% of all AI answers had at least one significant issue.
31% of responses showed serious sourcing problems – missing, misleading, or incorrect attributions.
20% contained major accuracy issues, including hallucinated details and outdated information.
4 AI systems in this study.
The eQuality Project retweeted
Shout it from the rooftops!!! Research is thinking. Outlining is thinking. Writing is thinking. Any portion of that done by AI is less thinking done by you.
The eQuality Project retweeted
Literacy. If the oligarchs have their way, the children of the very rich will have human teachers, physical textbooks, handwritten assignments, phoneless schools. Everyone else will have chromebooks, malfunctioning AI tutors and screen addiction.
The eQuality Project retweeted
It "ONLY" took 20 years to hold social media companies liable for their harmful practices.
We don't have all that time in AI.
Jury finds Meta and YouTube liable in landmark social media trial that accused the tech giants of harming a woman's mental health cnn.it/47TlGqg
The eQuality Project retweeted
This website shows you how much money is being siphoned off from human artists by AI slop on Spotify.
Over $2.5 million lost by real people - and that's just from 50 AI ‘artists’.
Slop dilutes royalties. A major reason AI training on copyrighted work should not be considered fair use.
sloptracker.org
The eQuality Project retweeted
They’re trying to eliminate human teachers at a time when less than a third of students can read on a basic level. Students don’t need fancy tech, which has already made learning nearly impossible. We’re spending billions to produce a nation of illiterates.
The eQuality Project retweeted
Cause for celebrations - more evidence that the AI genie is being put back in the bottle.
Open AI's copyright theft and generative video slop machine SORA is shutting down - & Disney pulls out its planned $1 billion.
Maybe Disney didn't like the DEPT of WAR/ OPEN AI optics.
The eQuality Project retweeted
Powerful words from University of Pennsylvania students against their university's headlong rush to embrace of AI:
The eQuality Project retweeted
“AI l cannot coexist with education - it can only degrade it.”
Incredibly powerful piece from students at the University of Pennsylvania.
thedp.com/article/2026/03/pe…
The eQuality Project retweeted
Went down the rabbit hole on this. Your brain treats a physical book like a landscape. It builds a spatial map of the text, the same way it maps trails, rooms, and city blocks. When you scroll on a phone, that map breaks apart.
Seven large-scale research reviews and direct brain scans confirm what you already feel.
A 2023 study in PLOS ONE attached brain-activity sensors to children’s heads while they read the same text on paper and on screen. Paper reading produced fast brain waves, the pattern linked to focused attention. Screen reading shifted the brain into slow waves, the pattern linked to mind wandering and daydreaming. Same kids. Same words. Measurably different brain states.
A separate 2022 study from Showa University in Japan scanned the front of the brain, the area that manages focus and comprehension, during phone versus paper reading. Smartphones sent that region into overdrive, meaning the brain was straining just to keep up with basic processing. Paper reading produced a moderate load that triggered natural deep breathing, which helped regulate brain function and sustain focus. The phone suppressed that breathing pattern entirely.
Since 2017, researchers have published seven major reviews combining hundreds of individual studies. Six of seven reached the same conclusion: people understand less on screens. A 2018 review of 54 studies and 170,000+ participants, literally titled “Don’t throw away your printed books,” found paper outperformed screens across the board for non-fiction. A 2024 follow-up with 49 more studies confirmed it. The gap has grown steadily every year since 2001. Being a “digital native” doesn’t help.
The best explanation is how your brain tracks where you are. Your short-term memory can only juggle about 7 things at once. A physical book gives you constant location cues: the weight shifting from right hand to left, where a paragraph sits on the page, how thick the remaining pages feel. Your brain hands off the “where am I in this text?” job to those physical signals, leaving more room for actually understanding what you’re reading. On a phone, every screen looks identical. Your brain has to track position and process meaning at the same time, and something gives.
A Norwegian eye-tracking study analyzing 25,000+ individual eye movements found screen readers processed text more shallowly. The students had no idea they were reading differently.
In 2019, nearly 200 reading scientists from 30+ countries signed an open letter warning that screen reading was degrading deep comprehension. Since then, Scandinavian countries, among the most digitized school systems on Earth, have started putting physical books back in classrooms.































