I. retweeted
Las razones de la crítica son legítimas. Heidi no tendría que salir con alguien tan mayor, tiene que haber más diferencia de edad, por ejemplo la que hay entre ella y yo.
I. retweeted
A Muslim stole and burned the nearly 1,000-year-old bones of Saint Nicholas, better known as Santa Claus.
Are you kidding me
I. retweeted
Supremo Pontífice... está usted informado sobre la cuestión incel?
📺 TV EN DIRECTO | El Papa bendice a las parejas a punto de casarse y llama al matrimonio: “Si antes dije no tengáis miedo en pensar en una vocación, el matrimonio también es una vocación. No tengáis miedo del matrimonio y de formar una familia” social.elpais.com/icvh4f
I. retweeted
If you work at a white collar job, you stare at screens during the workday. And since there is down time at work, you look at social media for fun. It helps the time go by. You can't walk away from your desk without losing your livelihood.
People who are independently wealthy like Bryan Johnson don't get it. They don't work a job. They don't have to stare at a screen if they don't want to. They can meditate in a room all day. So they criticize social media. They call it a poison.
It's not a poison. It's something to do at work before you go home.
I. retweeted
Los de Nvidia gastando cifras impronunciables para tener la ciberseguridad blindada y su CEO cae por el truco más viejo del libro: una hoe.
Nadie es más grande que el programa, nadie.
I. retweeted
nacido para ser un gato marinero que sueña con sus novias, mecido por las olas; obligado a comprar una baliza V16.
I. retweeted
El debate de la inmigración masiva y el reemplazo demográfico se termina así:
o le ponemos fin ya, o nos ponen fin a nosotros.
Es así de simple, y de cruel. No hay grises.
I. retweeted
finalment
🗣️ Carles Puigdemont: "Jo vull deixar de ser espanyol. Sovint faig la comparació amb qui se sent dona atrapada al cos d'un home"
rac1.cat/politica/20261109/3…
I. retweeted
Uclés es como si a la IA le pidas que escriba como un niño repelente que sabe muchas cosas pero que no conecta ninguna con sentido porque sus padres le dijeron que era especial para esconderle su discapacidad
🤯 Repaso del escritor David Uclés a Santiago Abascal en Instagram en la previa del próximo polémico programa de @LaRevuelta_TVE
I. retweeted
🚨🇪🇸 2026: En Madrid, el 56,3% de la población menor de 45 años ya sería de origen extranjero.
🌐 EspanAtlas.es/origenes
#EspanAtlas
I. retweeted
No necesito ni entrar en la noticia para saberlo
Cuatro intoxicados, dos mujeres y dos niños, por inhalar monóxido de carbono tras hacer una barbacoa en el salón de su casa 20minutos.es/castilla-la-man…
I. retweeted
"In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape"
One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!"
And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent.
It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential.
Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn.
In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier.
So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight?
This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way.
If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them.
And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form.
This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing.
This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead.
Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want.
The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both.
And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately.
Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do.
In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time."
In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do".
Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill.
We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again.
What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense.
Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.



















































