I. (@epee_boy) header
I. (@epee_boy) profile picture

🤺 🏋🏻‍♂️ 🦆. Dentro de un orden y, por tanto, en equilibrio.

Joined August 2021
Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)Photo by I. (@epee_boy)
Las razones de la crítica son legítimas. Heidi no tendría que salir con alguien tan mayor, tiene que haber más diferencia de edad, por ejemplo la que hay entre ella y yo.
Heidi Klum, 53, believes the age difference with husband Tom Kaulitz, 36, is criticized out of 'spitefulness' as both were spotted on board a luxury yacht in France.
6
5
102
6,102
A Muslim stole and burned the nearly 1,000-year-old bones of Saint Nicholas, better known as Santa Claus. Are you kidding me
616
3,597
354
24,822
792,112
men want one thing
If this doesn’t make you want to have children and start a family, nothing will.
10
135
1
3,154
61,285
I. retweeted
"¡Mira este vídeo! Si los gitanos no existieran habría que inventarlos" "Te voy a desmembrar lentamente mientras suena flamenquito"
1
18
78
1,432
Son todas unas hijas de puta
>Me contesta que estaba enferma >Me vuelve a ghostear >Cojo mis bártulos y retirada elegante vuelvo a mi humilde celibato
2
3
20
932
Como se siente ser un hombre sensitivo en un mundo de evil regañonas
2
4
147
5,897
In strong boomer fashion, Pope Leo thinks young people aren't getting married simply because they don't feel like it
“Dare to take the step of marrying and starting a family. Do not be afraid of ‘forever’!” - Pope Leo XIV A message this generation needs. ✝️
132
518
25
10,516
97,055
Supremo Pontífice... está usted informado sobre la cuestión incel?
📺 TV EN DIRECTO | El Papa bendice a las parejas a punto de casarse y llama al matrimonio: “Si antes dije no tengáis miedo en pensar en una vocación, el matrimonio también es una vocación. No tengáis miedo del matrimonio y de formar una familia” social.elpais.com/icvh4f
26
297
4
5,422
72,378
If you work at a white collar job, you stare at screens during the workday. And since there is down time at work, you look at social media for fun. It helps the time go by. You can't walk away from your desk without losing your livelihood. People who are independently wealthy like Bryan Johnson don't get it. They don't work a job. They don't have to stare at a screen if they don't want to. They can meditate in a room all day. So they criticize social media. They call it a poison. It's not a poison. It's something to do at work before you go home.
31
69
3
2,369
70,988
“En España puedes ser médico sin saber conjugar verbos que se enseñan en quinto de primaria”
De terror realmente los comentarios. Agradezco profundamente no encontrarme con gente así en estos años de mi formación en esta bella tierra que me acogido.
4
136
1,270
17,451
Los de Nvidia gastando cifras impronunciables para tener la ciberseguridad blindada y su CEO cae por el truco más viejo del libro: una hoe. Nadie es más grande que el programa, nadie.
1
11
84
1,364
nacido para ser un gato marinero que sueña con sus novias, mecido por las olas; obligado a comprar una baliza V16.
thomas the ship's cat, 1930s
1
23
121
2,935
“Sorry babe our life savings are gone. The CEO fucked a spy”
125
4,002
97
109,206
1,652,232
El debate de la inmigración masiva y el reemplazo demográfico se termina así: o le ponemos fin ya, o nos ponen fin a nosotros. Es así de simple, y de cruel. No hay grises.
11
127
3
857
9,657
Ridiculous that I now have to consider how Horny a CEO is when investing in a company
599
5,505
590
72,940
1,319,878
Uclés es como si a la IA le pidas que escriba como un niño repelente que sabe muchas cosas pero que no conecta ninguna con sentido porque sus padres le dijeron que era especial para esconderle su discapacidad
🤯 Repaso del escritor David Uclés a Santiago Abascal en Instagram en la previa del próximo polémico programa de @LaRevuelta_TVE
28
67
719
29,081
🚨🇪🇸 2026: En Madrid, el 56,3% de la población menor de 45 años ya sería de origen extranjero. 🌐 EspanAtlas.es/origenes #EspanAtlas
39
369
71
1,056
121,358
No necesito ni entrar en la noticia para saberlo
11
185
1
2,222
89,753
"In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape"
One of the amusing things about women is that one will walk past a conversation that isn't about her, has nothing to do with her, and immediately interrupt it to say "Hey everybody! This does not sexually arouse me! In fact quite the opposite!" And then she'll wonder why everyone seems to find that response incoherent. It's only funny, however, until you truly understand why it's happening. Then it's kinda... existential. Pick up a popular book, written by women, for women. At random. We all know that the odds are it's going to be porn. In fact, it's gonna be porn about the medium-height, slightly clumsy, brown-haired protagonist girl being kidnapped and ravished by a werewolf pirate billionaire warlord. And if you're wondering what "ravished" means, it's like rape, but sexier. So what's going on here? Why are modern women so porn-brained, and simultaneously so contemptuous of every actual male within their line of sight? This actually all fits together quite neatly. Women are not lying. They are telling us the truth. They are telling us exactly how they feel about all the things they see. They're just not very good at introspection. So they don't know why they feel that way. If we read their werewolf rape porn, we can immediately see what turns women on... men who have power over them. And the reason that women are reading werewolf rape porn is that actual men who have power over them are in short supply, and there's not enough to go around. Desperate for male dominance, they are mainlining a hypernormal stimulus in fictional form. This is also the reason women don't care about any harm they are doing to men with their newfound political and social power. To them, any man who doesn't have power over them, and especially a man who they have the power to hurt, is viscerally disgusting. He is an unperson, useless to them, and they don't care what he is experiencing. This is why they try to hurt men in the first place. Because they resent the fact that they can. They want us to be powerful, invincible, untouchable, and they lash out in frustration when we aren't, seeking to punish us for being vulnerable instead. Funny thing is, it's not even their fault. This is genetic programming, after all, not a choice. Ovaries want what they want. The bit they don't quite understand, however, the bit they haven't thought through, is that this doesn't work with the whole "equality" thing. A man can be more powerful than you, or he can be an equal. Can't be both. And, of course, men really do have power over women. Not only are they unable to defend themselves against us, they need us to feed, clothe, shelter and protect them. If we were collectively willing to take their civil rights away again, we could do so immediately. Women's rights exist only when and where men say they do. In the book 1984, which many women will be unfamiliar with because it doesn't contain any werewolf rape, George Orwell describes a process called "doublethink", which is defined as "sustaining two contradictory ideas by not ever thinking about both of them at the same time." In this case, the two ideas are "make me equal to you in power throughout society at large", and "have so much more power in our personal relationship that I am unable to hurt you no matter what I say or do". Eventually, men are simply going to have to come to a consensus over what to do about this, and decide which of these requests to fulfill. We can either be liberals, and accept perpetual female contempt as the price of that, or we can be vilified as reactionaries, but have women love us again. What is never going to happen is that you are never going to get a majority of women to see the contradiction here, and agree that this makes no sense. Which means we are going to have to make this decision on our own.
98
2,710
43
52,487
820,712