Shallon

Prof women *don't* display giant fetish-wear prosthetic boobs in the workplace, though. While the man has specific protection for this. It’s the nature of that protection that needs addressing. (A woman *could* be disciplined by her employer as she doesn’t have that protection)

‘Transphobia’ simply means the rejection of the doctrinal beliefs and political agenda of ‘trans’ ideology, which is a hyper-authoritarian and hyper-aggressive, absolutist and unhinged pseudo-religion, and surely one of the greatest evils of modern society.

Oddly, it’s claimed only ‘transwomen’ are at sky-high risk of violent assault in men’s loos (incl rape and murder), on account of them being ‘trans’, but never ‘transmen’, who are every bit as ‘trans’, who are encouraged to use them. Makes yer think: just where did that risk go?

No, I'm not ‘parts’. And I'm not a social construct. (My god, this is tiresome.)

Blocked! These people are idiotic. So I'm sending my reply to SS here. ‘Trans’ and ‘non-binary the conceptual inventions of a particular and recent ideology.* It cannot be imposed on history and people who lived their lives through a completely different conceptual framework.

Fine, sir. That’s your choice. Everyone (of sound mind) has the right to refuse the offer of medical treatment and admittance to hospital. What no one has is the right of accommodation on hospital wards provided for the opposite sex or the use of their lavatories and bathrooms.

Men seeing young women as female organ harvesting opportunities. Watch them circling female cadaver w/ hungry, covetous eyes. They’re drooling at the crazed thought of ripping female organs out of dead women and stuffing them up inside themselves, as if that turns them into women

Tell it as it is.

An image showing lots of dots that represent women and one dot that represents men. Specifically, the man dot is meant to represent female impersonators. There are fewer female impersonators than there are women. Not sure why a visual aid is needed to communicate that, but okay.

And with that, he turned off replies! Anyone might think that this blithering halfwit isn't even interested in proof.

A woman isn't a castrated man with a fuckhole. But I see that, having asked your asinine question, you’ve turned off replies!

Another reminder that third-person singular pronouns are motivated by the sex of the subject, not affection.

It doesn't. You're welcome.

Being born a chipmunk doesn’t preclude you from being an orangutan.

Here’s the ‘easiest way’ to expunge the recognition of female humans [aka women] written by a man [aka a male human]:

It's not ‘detransition’; it's cult faith belief deconstruction and cult desistance The basis of the ideological ‘transition’ belief was and is factitious – a delusion – and therefore it doesn't ‘work’ for anyone. That's a false belief.

And still, ‘transwomen’ are male. That's a necessary condition for that linguistic categorisation.

And the difference is… there isn't one. There are men pretending to be women. None of them are some sort of magical manifestation of the opposite sex. There’s no secret higher knowledge that reveals men as ‘truly’ women. They're all just men. Just men pretending to be women.

“How does this affect you?” “No one is erasing women.” Also:

I mastered pronouns before I turned three, thanks.