🧲 🌊 🚀🌕

Joined March 2019
🇺🇸 US Senator Elizabeth Warren calls to investigate Elon Musk. While serving 10 years in Congress with an annual salary of $193,000, she managed to increase her net worth to $73,000,000.
4,648
10,360
1,330
60,248
25,133,039
MAD
This bill is a wolf in sheep’s clothing. What it would actually mean is that if you disagree with the other parent about sterilizing your child, you lose custody. Utter madness!
49
9,625
40,869
2,078
380,645
46,096,011
Doges ftw
14,510
64,394
3,922
655,034
60,585,976
Replying to @DrEliDavid
How much does it cost?
6,773
6,770
1,066
112,114
9,503,310
The SEC has just been granted an order to seize the assets of Binance pending trial, essentially closing their business down before any judgement is made. This obvious all out sucker-punch aimed at crypto this week by the US government, suing both Binance and Coinbase — after a long and public struggle by Coinbase to ascertain the SECs position to no avail — is a nail in the coffin, not for crypto as they hoped, but for the United States oversight of the fledgling industry. Once the bastion of free thought and enterprise, attracting talent and ventures from across the world, no right-minded business working in crypto will consider a US domicile again. What they fail to understand is the crypto movement is anti-nationalistic and global minded. An outdated generation of old men clinging to ideals long turned sour with the hypocrisy of avarice, the US cannot grasp that the now-generation see themselves as global citizens thanks to the internet, which has bought us together as a people rather than disparate tribe, race or nations. Other countries, especially in the East are throwing open their arms offering clear regulation and boundaries — providing fair-haven for innovation in an industry that is not going away. In a desperate attempt to stifle opposition to their current dominance as the global reserve currency, the US government will inadvertently push crypto's success into the hands of their traditional opponents. kitco.com/news/2023-06-07/SE…
10
19
2
71
5,462
Replying to @jack
Doge ftw
3,130
2,530
579
19,759
4,104,827
As promised
22,190
45,716
14,645
656,542
82,329,069
27,650
67,855
15,890
785,954
77,533,528
Replying to @BurgerKingUK
It's a dogecoin knock-off designed to capitalize on the hype created by Elon's support for $doge and the name of his Shiba Inu, Floki.
29
15
1
154
4,393
Replying to @cb_doge
Ok, but it will cost 3 Doge
2,083
2,164
303
42,488
9,318,473
Why aren’t we talking about Vaquitas? The world smallest Whale on the brink of extinction #whales #savethewhales
2
3
1
8
712
🚨BREAKING: Never before seen video of January 6 shows Jacob Chansley, the QAnon Shaman, being led through the Capitol by police the entire time that he was in the building.
10,853
62,833
9,599
220,571
102,083,037
This is the most bullish I have felt since May 2021 and I want you to RT the shit out of this post! - Twitter Doge integration (Doge did not pump when Elon bought Twitter for nothing) - Doge-1 (SpaceX) - Doge (Tesla acceptance, already been piloted) - Doge (Richest man in the world holds) - Doge (Richest man in the world's child holds) - Doge CEO of Twitter - Crypto becoming more widespread - We already broke out of the LT downtrend since May 2021 when we started to dump - Bull flag (depicted below) - Elon recently tweeted twice about Doge (last tweet was October before then) - Elon stated it was him who let the Doge out - The price is at a point where, if we go cheaper (say 3/4 cents), it would be very bad for Doge because it will enable very large holdings which Elon previously stated is bad for Doge and he will personally buy large holders out. For this reason, I do not think that lower prices are coming - Across 1M, 3M, 6M and 12M chart - we are looking upwards (LT chart is saying we are going to rise) - Arguably, there is blood on the streets at this point, we are already 90% down, how much worse can it get? What did I miss except to RT the shit outta this? #dogecoin
33
126
7
262
36,816
High time I confessed I let the Doge out
10,677
13,548
2,054
196,076
50,413,048
Replying to @washingtonpost
Your article is false and obviously so. Do you really do no research at all? I mean, like reading a few tweets, for example.
Several major media sources incorrectly reported that my Tweets were boosted above normal levels earlier this week. A review of my Tweet likes & views over the past 6 months, especially as a ratio of followers, shows this to be false. We did have a bug that briefly caused replies to have the same prominence as primary Tweets, but that has now been fixed.
3,701
4,478
339
60,984
10,580,163
And has 🔥🔥 style
12,578
21,581
2,393
445,527
68,263,213