Mark Oakley describes life after 950 days of shielding, showing why we need Evusheld in the UK
youtube.com/watch?v=Vs623byo…
Martin Paul Eve is joining @CrossrefOrg ’s R&D group. I can't believe I actually got to type that. More here:
crossref.org/blog/martin-pau…
Feeling recursive? Come help @CrossrefOrg run the infrastructure that runs the infrastructure that ties scholarly publications together. We’re looking for a Site Reliability Engineer. Closing date: August 23rd.
crossref.org/jobs/2022-08-02…
. @AlfMalin (2012-2022) I cannot describe how much I miss him. He was such a sweet little man.
Tired of the academic grind, but still want to make a difference? Join @CrossrefOrg as a Principal R&D Developer where there is no REF and you don’t need to worry about your IF, but you’ll still make a big impact building Open Scholarly Infrastructure! crossref.org/jobs/
We’re looking for a new creature to join us at @CrossrefOrg as a Principal R&D Developer crossref.org/jobs/2022-06-17…
Come help @CrossrefOrg design and build a new generation of open scholarly infrastructure. We are hiring a Principal R&D Developer. crossref.org/jobs/
"Subsidized," "free to use," and "community-funded" are all vast improvements over "cost-free," for describing open scholarly infrastructure. but I wonder if we need to get the word "equitable" in there?
You’re unable to view this Post because this account owner limits who can view their Posts. Learn more
Cynics would claim that the "stakeholders" are the people who pay. But again, in POSI, we explicitly reject that view. openscholarlyinfrastructure.…
<rant>People who use the phrases "no-cost" or "cost-free" when talking about open infrastructure (scholarly or otherwise) are being either naïve or disingenuous.
And if I were a potential user of said service, I'd be wondering what happens after those four years of funding run out.
</rant>
Disclosure: I work for @CrossrefOrg. I am also a co-author of The Principles for Open Scholarly Infrastructure. And I am cranky. Bad takes are my own.




