1/5
“…focusing strictly on Bitcoin's dominance over an arbitrary pool of speculative altcoins is a dangerous distraction. It trains the community to look at fiat relative price performance instead of looking at whether anyone is actually building a parallel, sovereign economy.”
Michael Saylor clarifying his going to $1 million decree.🥳🤑
Bitcoin can go down to $1.00 first.😢
“Bitcoin can go to a dollar, a dollar a Bitcoin…we’re just gonna buy all the Bitcoin if it goes to a dollar a Bitcoin. Then it’s gonna go back up again.”
1/5
Bitcoin Power Law pundits say active addresses are a TRUSTWORTHY proxy for organic HUMAN adoption.
Addresses serve as the lynchpin of their Metcalfe’s Law equation.
I say “don’t trust, verify”.
Because the data reveals its algorithmic churn… not organic, natural scaling.
1/2
“Power Law modelers look at the floor holding for 17 years and see "immutable physics". The real-world data proves that the math has shifted: the lines on the paper are now being artificially maintained by Wall Street’s two-sided derivative games.” ~ Gemini
1/4
“Expecting Bitcoin to stay somewhere inside a massive, expanding corridor over a decade is the statistical equivalent of buying a lottery ticket and matching 2 or 3 numbers…Staying inside a wide band doesn’t prove a precise, unyielding natural law governs the asset” ~Gemini
1/4
“When institutional risk desks price distressed or non-productive alternative assets with severe operational vulnerabilities, they apply steep hair-cuts to the speculative market premium.”
~ Gemini
1/3
“The ultimate lesson of the Bitcoin experiment is that you cannot fix human greed with software code.
Bitcoin's protocol is a masterpiece of computer science, but its economic application was instantly captured by the very fiat dynamics it tried to escape.”
~ Gemini
1/4
“The development of railroads was a genuine technological revolution, much like the Bitcoin protocol.”
~ Gemini
2/4
“This mania featured a highly technical "debt swap" mechanism that functions remarkably like Michael Saylor's corporate ($MSTR) share-printing flywheel.”
~ Gemini
1/9
“The Bitcoin Power Law model claims that Bitcoin’s price behavior is governed by an immutable, "scale-invariant" physical law.”
~ Gemini
Wrapping an erratic real-world price history (blue) around an ENGINEERED Power Law “trend” (red) reinforces “up forever” fantasy
Without the “magic” of log-log to conceal the damage, the only TREND Bitcoin’s real-world price history reveals is VOLATILITY and INHERENT UNCERTAINTY
Wrapping an erratic real-world price history (blue) around an ENGINEERED Power Law “trend” (red) reinforces “up forever”🤑 fantasy.
Without the “magic” of log-log to conceal the damage… Bitcoin’s real-world data reveals a highly volatile and inherently uncertain price history.”
“despite the buzz online calling this a "bullish flip," JPMorgan is explicitly not recommending Bitcoin as a core portfolio allocation or a reliable diversifier … headline number comes with several major caveats that explain the bank’s ongoing institutional skepticism:” ~ Gemini
Trust me bro Saylor says $MSTR is just like an insurance company.
Insurance companies would go out of business if they sold policies with the understanding they could just suspend the policy if they needed to … and not process the claim.
JUST IN: Strategy's Michael Saylor just said that MSCI's decision on removing #Bitcoin treasury companies from its indexes "is not that important to us."
"Digital assets are smarter, faster, and stronger, they're the future. MSCI may not want to share in it, but investors and the nation will disagree."
"They're imposing prejudicial values on digital assets." 👀
MSCI understands Bitcoin and $MSTR “flywheel” model, IMO
Maybe they think Saylor has a lot to learn about… ethics and risk management?
“…we basically borrowed money that we never have to pay back. That we pay a dividend on, but we could suspend the dividend if we needed to.”
1/5
“Power Law model attempts to dress Bitcoin’s price history in a lab coat…when subjected to strict "don't trust, verify" cryptographic and econometric audit, the model relies on manipulated proxies, retroactively altered formulas and massive logical contradictions.”
~Gemini
1/4
“Yes, your focus on Granger causality requires a meaningful revision.” (of the Drivers of Bitcoin Price Pie Chart)
~ Gemini
1/5
“An institutional-grade econometric breakdown estimates the long-term price action attribution as follows:”
~ Gemini
1/3
“The core mistake made by almost all Bitcoin market commentators—both hyper-bullish "Maximalists" and hyper-bearish critics—is conflating a highly predictable, deterministic piece of software with a highly unpredictable, reflexive global financial market.”
~ Gemini
I don’t TRUST the causal relationship between number of addresses over time and price of Bitcoin.
Has anyone VERIFIED if “going up forever” price goes up and to the right just because…
“…If enough people think the same way, that becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.”
~ Satoshi
1/4
"Parlor trick" is an incredibly precise and accurate way to describe the optical illusion created by log-log graphing … It is a geometric certainty of the graph's design, not a discovery of natural physics.” ~ Gemini



































