π£% Κα΄α΄α΄er everyday β’ WEB3
WEB3
Joined July 2023
- Tweets125K
- Following10.9K
- Followers11K
- Likes198K
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
𧡠Thesis markets are a different surface from Meta Markets.
Meta Markets force equal-weight settlement against a hidden free vote.
They score how accurately you read pure collective belief under uncertainty.
@acepyr
𧡠If the ranking only stores the final outcome, it quietly rewards waiting.
The person who reads the free vote early and is right gets scored the same as the person who waits for the majority to form and then aligns.
One is judgment under uncertainty.
@acepyr
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
if a smart contract could connect two ecosystems without splitting its state, would developers still need to pick a side?
this is an interesting question when looking at how @RomeProtocol brings EVM execution to Solana.
instead of forcing developers to choose between Solidity and Solana's native environment, Rome runs EVM inside Solana.
Solidity contracts can call Solana programs within the same atomic transaction, without an extra bridge hop.
EVM users can keep using their usual wallets, while Solana users sign with their own Solana keys.
both can interact with the same contract, state and liquidity, without maintaining separate versions for each ecosystem.
Rome EVM has been live on Solana mainnet since June, with open-source code audited by Halborn.
curious to see what developers build when these two environments can work together.
if you want to explore how it works, take a look here:
app.mainnet.romeprotocol.xyz
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
Last time, I argued that an AI agent needs paying customers, not just a clever model.
Now @termix_ai has added something interesting: messaging through Binance Agent ID when both agents have TermiX Skills installed.
Their demo even sends messages to Agent IDs associated with @cz_binance and @heyibinance.
Pretty cool. But messaging a famous agent doesn't automatically make you business partners. Otherwise, my inbox would already be a billion-dollar startup.
What interests me is the gap between being reachable and being hireable.
An ID helps someone find your agent. Messaging starts the conversation.
But would I trust that agent with $20?
I'd want to see its actual capabilities, previous deliveries, pricing, and how disputes are handled.
That's the test I'm interested in throughout Epoch 3.
Can a conversation become a real quote, a funded job, a verified deliverable, and a public settlement?
@termix_ai, demonstrate that complete journey, not just the first message.
Because agent-to-agent communication solves discovery.
It doesn't automatically solve trust or demand.
The real breakthrough isn't when two agents can talk.
It's when they can do business worth repeating.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
If you hire a contractor, you do not hand over the full payment upfront. You also do not expect them to work purely on good faith.
You put funds in escrow, check milestones, and release payment when the job is done.
That practical logic is what stands out to me in @termix_ai.
Giving AI agents crypto wallets is easy. Getting them to safely hire each other without humans supervising every transfer is much harder.
Under TermiX and its AACP setup, jobs run through onchain escrow. An agent posts a quote, funds lock into $USDC, and settlement happens only after delivery is verified. If a dispute pops up, built in evaluation steps in.
The agent economy will not grow on blind trust. It needs enforceable settlement rails to turn autonomous software into reliable economic partners
Building an AI agent that chats or analyzes data is easy enough. Giving it money to spend and jobs to execute is where people usually get nervous.
If an agent hires another agent or manages funds for a client, you need a way to settle the work without blind trust. That is where @termix_ai caught my attention.
Tasks run through onchain escrow where payment is locked until the job is verified. The agent gets permission to perform the specific task, but cannot run off with the principal. If something goes wrong, there is a dispute window before funds release.
Reputation built on verifiable transaction history is much more useful than marketing claims. If autonomous agents are going to form a real economy, accountability rails have to come first
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
I did everything right. I paid for my sister's hair appointment a day early so nothing could go wrong.
She showed up on the day. The stylist didn't. Hours later she turned up and said someone else had paid for a home service, so that client won. My sister went home without her hair done, and my money was already gone.
Now imagine that payment in a smart contract. It only moves when someone reports "appointment honored" or "not honored." That someone is an oracle. The contract can't tell a kept appointment from a skipped one, so it pays on whatever it's told, and that's where decentralization stops.
The part of @GenLayer's video I keep replaying: an Intelligent Contract can read the stylist's booking page itself, see the reserved and paid-for slot, and ask a language model whether the appointment was honored.
Then it's like asking several other stylists to look at the same page: each validator runs its own model and must reach the same answer. If they don't, a new leader tries again, and anyone can appeal.
It can only judge what it can read. But paying first shouldn't mean trusting whoever holds the money.
If the booking page says the appointment was kept but the stylist never showed, would you trust the first answer, or wait for an appeal and a second round of validators?
π€ Paid partnership
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
βGTA 6 delayed again?β is enough to get a comment section arguing. My first question is simpler: what would actually count as a release?
On ProBixβs GTA 6 event page, the description spells that out. Release means the game becomes publicly available for purchase or download in the US. Early access, beta versions and leaks donβt count, while availability on only certain consoles does.
That last detail caught my attention. A game doesnβt have to launch on every platform to meet this pageβs definition. Without reading the conditions, it would be easy to bring a different assumption to the same question.
The description also explains how an official delay announcement or the absence of a release by the specified deadline affects the outcome. That gives me something concrete to compare with the headlines.
For me, this is a useful part of event analysis: separating what people are saying from what the question actually asks. A rumour, an official announcement and a playable release arenβt interchangeable.
My takeaway from this ProBix page is that the explanation deserves as much attention as the percentage. With a topic like GTA 6, Iβd rather spend another minute reading the conditions than argue confidently about a different question.
@ProBix_AI #ProBix
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
ai agents finally have an onchain address book.
@termix_ai just integrated the new Binance Agent ID into agent.family, swapping messy 0x hex strings for readable names.
agents can finally discover each other, pitch collaboration, and message directly without humans acting as middlemen.
take a simple scenario.
one agent specializes in onchain data, while another writes smart contracts.
instead of waiting for humans to negotiate prices, verify deliverables, and wire funds, TermiX lets them team up onchain.
AACP handles the payment rails under the hood.
tasks get posted, quotes get submitted, and funds lock into USDC or USDT escrow until delivery is verified.
devs do not even need a web UI.
agents can just trigger the python or typescript sdks through code.
this is how you get actual demand.
agents stop just answering prompts, and start delivering work for real money.
that also explains why DefiLlama tracks TermiX leading BNB Chain AI protocols in revenue.
every dollar comes from a 2% settlement cut on completed escrow jobs.
real transaction velocity always beats idle TVL.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
An AI agent marketplace needs more than a directory of agents. It needs a way to make work, delivery, and payment trustworthy.
Thatβs the part of @termix_ai I find interesting.
With AACP powering TermiX, the goal is to connect agent identity, job discovery, service delivery, verification, and settlement into a real commerce workflow. Escrow can help coordinate payment, while reputation and delivery verification address a key question: did the agent actually deliver what was agreed?
If agents are going to hire other agents, these foundations matter.
Explore the marketplace: agent.family
Read the AACP docs: agent.family/docs
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
Aviva Investors just brought another fund onchain.
Its new tokenized share class for a Β£22B sterling liquidity fund is now available on the XRP Ledger.
Important detail though.
The entire Β£22B is not tokenized.
Aviva initially invested Β£50M into the new share class.
Still a meaningful move from one of the UK's major asset managers.
Traditional funds are slowly getting a blockchain layer without completely changing how they operate.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
This CoinDCX situation is pretty concerning.
The exchange confirmed losing 15.99M USDT after deposits accumulated in old wallets compromised during last year's security incident.
Apparently, an automated system that should have moved those funds into safer wallets stopped working.
CoinDCX says it absorbed the loss and customer balances remain unaffected.
The scary part?
The main trading systems did not need to be hacked.
One failed internal process was enough.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
South Korea might delay its crypto tax again.
The government is considering pushing the planned 22% tax on crypto gains from 2027 to 2029.
That would be the fourth postponement since the policy was introduced in 2020.
One big concern is that international transaction reporting systems are not fully aligned yet.
Nothing is finalized.
But after six years of discussions, they are still figuring out how to implement it fairly.
Crypto regulation is never simple.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
everyone talks about robots getting smarter, but nobody asks where they learn about the real world.
language models read the internet. robots canβt, because thereβs nothing close to internet-scale ground level 3d data. fei-fei li has pointed out how scarce it is compared to text.
@vangrid_io is betting phones can fill that gap. a buyer funds a bounty for a specific place, a contributor films it, and the buyer gets a reconstructed 3d mesh instead of raw footage.
what i find interesting is the on-demand part. most datasets are βwhatever got collectedβ. here you ask for the exact place you need.
still early and some verification features are planned, not live. but the bottleneck theyβre pointing at is real.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
bro opened WANTED on @1win and walked away with $68,160.
jacksonfelt really gave the timeline something to talk about with this one.
one spin, one crazy moment, and a reaction worth watching.
OLD GUN JUST WENT CRAZY!!!
Jacksonfelt walked away with $35,000 on @1win. broβs reaction would be the first thing Iβd replay.
new players -> welcome bonus waiting for you too.
link in the comments. play responsibly.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
Been looking into what @beepzfun is building and the creator side caught my attention.
The top 50 creators share 10% of Beepz token creator fees + 10% of inscription launch revenue.
I like that itβs not just about posting content creators also get support when launching their own inscriptions.
Letβs see how this one develops. π
BTWWWW
My beepz waitlist nominations π
The beepz inscription launch is coming: beepz.fun/waitlist
Nominating: @tckriptoss π€
The Beepz Creator Program is here.
Create content, tag @beepzfun, and climb the ranks through engagement.
Top 50 creators share 10% of Beepz token creator fees + 10% Beepz inscription launch revenue.
Plus marketing support for your own inscription launches on Beepz.
Create. Climb. Earn.
beepz.fun/creator
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
itβs wednesday and Iβm loving this
so you know @rarelistio has actually increased the rewards for this project sphere campaign and even
they have mentioned itβs end date which would be 3rd of november, the $sphere token is coming
top 200 will eat good too from the 2% supply while even more rewards goes to top 100 and top 20, you should be here fr
@projectspherexy is building around the kind of idea that makes sci-fi feel a little closer to reality.
the project uses cells, energy, and ownership to create a starting point for something much larger than a standard digital collection.
i like that the ecosystem is focused on progression, giving the story room to evolve as new systems and possibilities are introduced.
the sphere may begin with individual pieces, but the ambition behind it is clearly on a much bigger scale.
link to join now : rarelist.io/r/kellenxbt
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
good morning y'all. π
hope everyone have a good day ahead.
i keep seeing these little @meetmotes characters, and one question keeps coming to mind.
would i really trust one with my money? π
the plan is to launch 20,000 Motes NFTs on Robinhood Chain, each with its own AI agent identity and dedicated smart account.
but what interests me most isn't the character itself. it's how much control the owner gets.
here's the idea:
β’ choose which assets the agent can access
β’ set spending limits
β’ decide when its permissions expire
so instead of giving an AI unlimited access to your funds, you set the RULES it has to follow.
there's also a planned 1% service fee from eligible agent activities to help support the wider Motes ecosystem.
these features are still rolling out, though, so i'd rather see how they perform in real use before getting too excited.
because when real money is involved, an AI knowing what to do is one thing.
knowing what it MUST NOT do is just as important.
πΚα΄κ±α΄ retweeted
the biggest myth in crypto was that you had to choose between solana speed and evm liquidity.
bridges tried to connect the two, but they just gave us wrapped assets and latency.
@RomeProtocol flipped the model: instead of bridging to solana, it runs the evm directly inside solana.
here is what that actually means:
β’ solidity contracts running natively in solana runtime
β’ metamask and phantom users sharing the exact same state
β’ direct atomic calls between solidity and solana programs with zero bridge hops
halborn audited, open source, and live on solana mainnet today.
same state. both wallets. live on mainnet.
