hoffman (@hoffman2cb) profile picture
Joined May 2026
Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)Photo by hoffman (@hoffman2cb)
hoffman retweeted
I have been saying this since the moment they said crypto and UAE.
🚨 BREAKING : DID MUIZZU FALL FOR A FAKE SAUDI PRINCE SCAM? The man shaking hands with @MMuizzu is not the son of Saudi King Fahd. There is no record of him. No official documents. No credible information online. The name “Prince Fahad Saud al-Shalan” only appears on the President’s Office website. That’s it. This is either a pathetic scam or a disgraceful lie, and the Parliament of Maldives needs to speak up now. The people of this country deserve to know if their president got scammed. @AlArabiya_Eng @AJEnglish @Reuters @guardian
5
13
41
14,759
hoffman retweeted
Watching how all government bots are jumping ship to @MDPSecretariat like:
2
7
1
34
3,006
hoffman retweeted
ގައުމު އިނދަޖެހުނީއެއް ނޫން. ރޭވުންތެރިކަމާއި އެކު ރައްޔިތުން ނިކަމެތިކޮށް، އަމިއްލަވަންތަކަން ގެއްލުވާލީ ހީލަތްތެރި ރޭވުމެއްގެ ތެރެއިން. ނިކަމެތިވެ، ދަތިވެފައިތިބި ރައްޔިތެއް، ކިއްޕާ ދަށުންދޭ ޝެކަލް ގައި ހިފާނެކަން އެމީހުން ދަނޭ.
4
12
258
hoffman retweeted
We are releasing our politically exposed persons (PEP) database consisting of 15,000+ people. [🔴] DISCLAIMER: This has been an ongoing project for more than six months and we have now reached a point where we cannot expand further with only public data. This is not a comprehensive list of all PEPs in Maldives, and I believe compiling such a list without state/bank resources or unconventional methods is entirely impossible. There is a huge asterisk looming over the entire list, and that is because family records are not public. We assume a person is family (or extended family) of a direct PEP because they are in the same household. For some households this will NOT be accurate as sometimes non-family members are registered under the same household. However, this assumption we are making is a reasonable heuristic when we look at the broader picture. We determine affiliate PEPs through two ways: 1) household members, 2) business partners with unique names We believe this list is reasonably accurate. Being named here is not in any way shape or form an accusation of wrongdoing. If you think you should not be here, please feel free to contact me. SOURCES: Internet archive/wayback machine, @archivecurator, public documents, and RTIs. 🔗: drive.proton.me/urls/R25BY20…
3
22
1
69
11,225
Replying to @aaidhmaldives
@aaidhmaldives was right 💀
The harder those in power work to suppress information, the more likely it is to be exposed.
9
18
1,969
hoffman retweeted
ސަލަފު ޖަމީޔާގެ ރަސްމާލޭ ޝަރުތު ތައް. ރާ ބޯއިރު ބިސްމި ކިޔުން، އޫރުމަސް ކާއިރު ބިސްމި ކިޔުން، ލިވާތު ކުރާއިރު "ނޯ ހޯމޯ" ކިޔުން، ކެސީނޯ ތަކުން ގުރުއާނުގެ އަޑު އިއްވުން، ފައްޅިތަކުން އަޅުކަން ކުރަން ފަށާއިރު ބިސްމި ކިޔުން.
5
15
1
32
1,483
hoffman retweeted
Ehen verikamegga nama mi thaaeedhu nukuran ethah aayatheh kiyaane.
ޝަރުތުތަކަކާއެކު އެހެން ދީންތަކުގެ މީހުން ރާއްޖޭގައި ވަޒަންވެރިކުރުވަން ސަލަފު ޖަމިއްޔާއިން ތާއީދުކޮށްފި adhadhu.com/89144
3
14
32
1,022
hoffman retweeted
ޝަރުތުތަކަކާއެކު އެހެން ދީންތަކުގެ މީހުން ރާއްޖޭގައި ވަޒަންވެރިކުރުވަން ސަލަފު ޖަމިއްޔާއިން ތާއީދުކޮށްފި adhadhu.com/89144
43
43
62
55
22,136
hoffman retweeted
The world seems to be heading into complete chaos. Whatever may happen or not, just remember, that your Lord is not one eyed.
4
9
37
844
They can't live with their failure so they changed the rules for themselves
Today’s Asandha system is the product of nearly two decades of development under 5 Presidents. So why shouldn’t those same Presidents receive healthcare through the very system they built for the country? If former Presidents and MPs still require special healthcare privileges outside Asandha, what does that say about the healthcare system they’ve provided for ordinary citizens? If the system they built is good enough for the people, shouldn’t it be good enough for them too? Let that sink in.
6
16
606
Today’s Asandha system is the product of nearly two decades of development under 5 Presidents. So why shouldn’t those same Presidents receive healthcare through the very system they built for the country? If former Presidents and MPs still require special healthcare privileges outside Asandha, what does that say about the healthcare system they’ve provided for ordinary citizens? If the system they built is good enough for the people, shouldn’t it be good enough for them too? Let that sink in.
2
47
1
99
4,067
hoffman retweeted
ދަރިންނޭ ގައުމުގެ ދުވަސް ހިނގައްޖެ ދީ؟
4
17
2
27
1,006
Mi beethaa kairi bunebala MDP eh nooney verikamuga mihaaru othy
ދިވެހި تعليمي މުގައްރަރުގައި ޔަހުދީންގެ އަގީދާ އާއި ވައްޓަފާޅި ހިމެނުމަށް އެމްޑީޕީ ސަރުކާރުން އިޒްރޭލާއެކު އެއްބަސްވެފައިވާ ޙަބަރު sun.mv/3884 17 ޑިސެމްބަރ 2010 ގައި އެމްޑީޕީ ސަރުކާރުން ތައުލީމީ ނިޒާމަށް ޒަހަރުލީކަމުގެ ސާބިތު ހެކި.. @VaguthuOnline @MMTVmv
1
5
184
އަގު ލިސްޓު! ހެސްކިޔާފަ މައްޗަށް ! މުސާރަ ބޮޑުކޮށްގެން ނޫނީ ގަނެވޭކަށް ނެތް! ވަޒީފާ އަދާކޮށްގެން ލިބޭ އާމްދަނީ އިން ދެކޮޅު ނުޖެހޭކަމަަށް ވަޒީފާ އަދާކުރާ މީހުން އެބަ ބުނޭ! ސަރުކާރަށް ކޮށްދެވޭނެ ކަމެއް ނެތީތޯ؟
1
2
1
7
1,208
hoffman retweeted
🤡Charukeys vs major road block! #govmv priorities 🤦🏾‍♂️
6
15
1
47
5,564
Eagle Hills' link to Zionism cannot be erased, but Rasmale deal's commercial terms can be amended. Zio Naaif knows this. So he’s saying that Rasmale deal should not be debated on religious or anti-Zionist grounds. And that it should not be the central concern and that public debate should instead focus on the agreement's commercial terms, which, unlike Eagle Hills' ties to Zionism, can be renegotiated. In effect, he is trying to persuade the public that Zionism is not a legitimate basis for demanding the agreement's termination. Well, Naaif. Zio. Fuck you. Zionism is why we’re opposed to the deal. Everything else comes after that. Public interest test fails at Zionism. We’re not interested in the commercial terms nonsense. It’s irrelevant.
13
1
22
8,688
No. Maldives ZIONISM apologist era. Secularity would be surprisingly much better than “Muslim country” where criticizing one for their “religion” is illegal. They purposely left the wording vague and claim we can still criticize Zionism as it’s a movement. Too bad religious Zionism is a thing tho?
…sooo maldives secular era???
1
1
4
229
The reason many MPs are now soft launching that the citizens do not need to see the eagle hills rasmale agreement is because - the deal we are being presented is not what is being signed - we will not get to see the full contract terms - the financial terms we will be presented with are not truly accurate
1
4
1
15
1,238
How a political party governs itself as a party reflects how it will govern the country when in power.
5
2
31
1,576