Wadeed

Almost 73% of the websites cited across ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini and Perplexity appeared in just ONE of them. Only 2.2% were cited by all four. So if you are checking ChatGPT to see whether your company is “showing up in AI search,” you may be looking at a very incomplete picture. A new study gives us a useful look at just how differently the major AI platforms research and cite the web. Let’s go through it. And if you want to see where your business stands across ChatGPT, Claude, Google AI, Perplexity, Grok and broader AI search, start here. It’s free: seo-stuff.com/free-audit Prefer ran the same 80 questions through ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini and Claude. Each question was tested three times on each platform, and that produced 960 AI answers and 1,329 different cited websites. The results were pretty interesting. 966 of those websites appeared in only one AI engine. 205 appeared in two. 129 appeared in three. Just 29 appeared across all four. Basically, there really was no universal “AI search result.” Different systems can research the exact same topic and pull information from very different parts of the web. SEO Stuff's Done-for-you setup was created with this in mind: seo-stuff.com/gold-plan-pack… The number of sources they cited was dramatically different too. Perplexity averaged 19.48 sources per answer. Gemini averaged 8.64. Claude averaged 4.58. ChatGPT averaged just 3.05. Across the 240 answers generated by each platform, Perplexity cited 748 different websites, Gemini 580, Claude 333 and ChatGPT 218. That is why asking “How do I rank in AI?” is not as informative as it sounds. The questions that make a bit more sense (and will help you more long-term) are: How often do I appear in ChatGPT? What does Claude know about my company? Which sources does Perplexity trust in my category? What is Gemini surfacing for the questions my buyers ask? There was another important finding, by the way. The researchers asked the same questions three times within seconds of each other, yet the cited websites still changed. Average overlap between repeat runs was: 96% for Perplexity. 68% for Claude. 37% for ChatGPT. 35% for Gemini. Same question. That matters enormously for measurement because if you ask ChatGPT one question once and do not see your company, that does not necessarily mean you never appear. And if you do see your company once, that does not mean you reliably own that answer either. You need repeated measurements across multiple prompts and multiple platforms, otherwise you can end up building an entire AI strategy around a screenshot. So what about sources? Well, Reddit appeared in 207 of the 960 answers, making it the most frequently cited site in the study. Claude cited Reddit zero times. Gemini cited YouTube in 113 answers. ChatGPT, Claude and Perplexity cited YouTube zero times in this dataset. Perplexity cited LinkedIn in 73 answers. Claude cited it twice. ChatGPT and Gemini did not cite it at all. Again, the study focused on 80 questions about AI search, GEO and AEO. Healthcare, finance, ecommerce or local-service prompts could produce a very different source mix, but the larger point is difficult to ignore. Different AI systems have different retrieval behavior, different source ecosystems and different levels of citation consistency. That said, the biggest authoritative sources traveled much better across platforms. Among the 25 most-cited sites, 23 appeared across three or four engines. Five of the top 10 appeared across all four. So the fragmentation was much heavier in the long tail, and that may actually be the most useful takeaway for businesses. You want enough content breadth to appear across many relevant questions, but you also want enough authority that multiple systems repeatedly trust your website and the third-party sources validating your company. That is where traditional SEO and AI Search Optimization start overlapping again. Build useful content around the questions buyers actually ask. Make your company, products and category easy to understand. Earn credible third-party mentions and contextual backlinks. Create comparisons, alternatives, use cases and decision-stage content. That is exactly why SEO Stuff approaches AI visibility across multiple platforms rather than treating it as a ChatGPT-only exercise: seo-stuff.com/ A company can perform well in ChatGPT and poorly in Claude. If your company only measures one AI platform, you may be missing most of the picture. And if you want to see where your business stands across Google, ChatGPT, Claude and the major AI search platforms, start here: seo-stuff.com/free-audit

Okay I've been digging into this throughout the day. I have no idea what these crypto scammers did, but their fake T3 Code scam clone gets recommended by ChatGPT constantly. Can anyone help us figure out wtf is causing this?

Our teams are aware of reports of a potential security issue and are actively investigating. Our security teams are reviewing all relevant information with urgency, and we will provide updates through official Binance channels as soon as we have verified information. Users should remain cautious of scams and should not trust unofficial links, messages, or requests for account information.

with the voices in my head