
SEO enabler @webstaurant. Strong tech SEO bent. Musician & printmaker as time permits.
Lititz PA
Joined September 2008
- Tweets533
- Following338
- Followers137
- Likes2.1K
Good counterpoint.
My take on the leaked docs.
We don’t know if this is for production or for testing. My guess is it’s mostly for testing potential changes.
We don’t know what’s used for web or for other verticals. Some things might only be used for a Google home or news etc.
We don’t know what’s an input to a ML algo and what’s used to train against. My guess is clicks aren’t a direct input but used to train a model how to predict clickability. (Outside of trending boosts)
I’m also guessing that some of these fields only apply to training data sets and not all sites.
Am I saying Google didn’t lie? Not at all. But let’s examine this leak objectionably and not with any preconceived bias.
Shaping up to be a busy week for SEOs.
Ok, let's get this party started!
A couple weeks ago I said I was publishing the most important thing I ever wrote. I was wrong.
Documentation related to the Google Search algorithm leaked and I spent the weekend tearing it apart.
ipullrank.com/google-algo-le…
✌🏾
ianschaefer retweeted
It here! The DOJ finally released "Life of a Click" - explaining how Google used clicks for ranking
3 Pillars of Ranking:
• On-page
• Links+Anchors
• User-interaction
1/5 🧵
"bug"
Google working on fixing a bug where some searchers are seeing five search ads in the Google search results seroundtable.com/google-ads-… via @ShalomGood and @adsliaison
ianschaefer retweeted
If anyone can see this, Sistrix reports Twitter's search visibility down 32% in 24 hours
Google site: search returns 100s of MILLIONS fewer URLs than the previous week
We are witnessing—in real time—the greatest self-inflicted SEO f-up the world has ever seen
Move over, LLMs.
We are releasing a whole-brain connectome of the fruit fly, including ~130k annotated neurons and tens of millions of typed synapses!
Explore the connectome: codex.flywire.ai/
Reconstruction paper: biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
Annotation paper: biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/…
1/6
Fact.
Replying to @SimoAhava
I think that if Google were a challenger, not the incumbent, they would have huge difficulties introducing GA4 as a viable analytics platform to the market.
ianschaefer retweeted
SEOs can be *really good at SEO,* but not really good at SEO for *all types of sites.*
There is so much specific subject matter expertise within the field and different types of sites require totally different strategies.
One of many reasons I love working on a big SEO team.
ianschaefer retweeted
Somewhat ironic that SEOs were all into using AI to mass produce content, now that Google and Bing announce their AI content efforts, it is unfair. I like to just sit back and watch...
NORA queries (No One Right Answer) are target of Google’s AI.
ianschaefer retweeted
I still think about them both all the time. I hope they are never forgotten by the SEO industry. They gave us so much. 💔 – at Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Respect to two SEO legends. Both @bill_slawski and @hamletbatista were innovators and trailblazers in the SEO industry. Can anyone guess the insights they would've have had about ChatGPT? Imagine the mind-blowing use cases from Hamlet, the eye-opening patents from Bill.


























