Pinned Tweet
很多反贼朋友喜欢说，毛打韩战是为了借刀杀人、消耗前国军旧部。此说符合人们想象，但与实情不符。我也反感毛，但阴谋论并不可取。长此以往，认知难免会出现偏差。其实以中共军队成分来看，根据周恩来传所载之周讲话稿，到1950年夏，中共军中前国军旧部，所谓解放战士，高达七八成，各军情况大体相同。
以这个人员构成，他送谁去死呢？
用常成教授@DavidChangCheng 的话来讲，他去朝鲜打仗，当然是为了打胜仗，肯定是精锐尽出。首批入朝的13兵团，38、39、40军是全军战略预备队，一等一的主力。紧接着第二批入朝的9兵团，本来是用来攻打台湾的华野精兵，各军都是四师制，兵强马壮。
显然，这个配置就是奔着打胜仗去的。能不能打胜他当然没把握，这是另外一个问题了。
分析问题，应该有一说一，脑洞大开的阴谋论对提升我们的认知并无任何益处，if not harmful. 这也是我为何再次讲这个车轱辘话 😂👇
美、以敲打伊朗神棍，正是围观AI时代最in军事作战方式的绝佳机会。
当然 News Facts 最重要，赶紧去你们县图书馆网站上看看，大概率都订阅了 WSJ 和 NYT 数据库。一般而言，需要定期，比如三天，renew一次。
房产税交都交了，资源还是要合理利用一下嘛。
Be ferociously independent and having the f**k u money.
以后就如此祝福别人了😁，sincerely
基于目前录像，这个分析可能最接近事实，a truly sad and unfortunate tragedy.
但最初那位凶猛推倒路旁女士的agent，简直恶意满满。
至于迫不急待地宣称受害者为 terrorist 的Miller 和 Noem 等政客嘛，距离成为美国公敌也就50米的距离，难逃被钉上历史耻辱柱的命运。
这可能是耻辱柱的最大耻辱🤷♂️
I've slowed this down.
In the huddle, one or more ICE officers shout 'GUN'. This caused another officer to draw his sidearm.
Another officer removed the man's sidearm, and then walked away, but it was discharged negligently (see for yourself).
The Sig P320 is notorious for NDing, but typically only when dropped.
That then triggered the other agents to think that the man on the ground, Alex Pretti, had begun shooting, so they neutralised the perceived threat.
If this is what happened, it's an incredibly unfortunate accident in Minneapolis.
毕竟光复汉城如摧枯拉朽，当腊圣觉得把联军赶入大海指日可待，那胃口不免更大一些。
及至百万大军溃退北逃，那可不得大喊慈父救我么，什么台湾和联合国席位，能当饭吃吗？提它做甚😂
#OTD
1951年1月14日周恩来致金日成的备忘录：
一、提议“在同意从朝鲜撤退一切外国军队后，朝鲜内政由朝鲜人民自己解决的基础上举行有关各国的谈判，以结束朝鲜战争”。
二、谈判内容必须包括美国武装力量从台湾海峡撤退及远东有关问题。
三、举行谈判的国家应包括中国、苏联、英国、法国、美国、印度和埃及七国。中国在联合国的合法地位，即从举行七国会议予以确定。
四、七国会议的地点提议选在中国。
五个月后
1951年6月13日毛电高岗和金日成（两人正急访苏联）转斯大林：
* 最好由苏联政府根据凯南的声明向美国政府试探停战问题。
*至于中国进入联合国的问题，我们认为，可以不提出这个问题作为条件，因为中国可以援引“联合国实际上已成为侵略工具”，所以中国现在不认为“进入联合国的问题”有特别意义。
*是否值得把台湾问题作为条件提出来？为了同他们讨价还价，我们认为应当提出这个问题。在美国坚持台湾问题单独解决的情况下，我们将做出相应的让步。
被吴战狼京弄得热血沸腾的老少爷们儿看了会不会沉默？真实的历史，就是这般残酷。
人们总在歌颂志愿军战士血洒沙场，那血流完之后呢，这些人魂归何处？
可怜长津湖边骨，是否还是春闺梦里人？
感谢阿毛大作。
Pinker 这么讲还是非常有勇气的。
I explain why the accusation that Israel is committing "genocide" is blood libel.
Me:
The application of the word genocide to refer to tens of thousands of war deaths is, I mean, I think it is a kind of blood libel. It's trying to import the moral opprobrium that we associate with genocide to a designated enemy, in this case, Israel. I think because I alluded to my side bias, the sides in this case being the sides that a lot of hard left critical theory has defined, namely white oppressors against everyone else's victims.
Moynihan:
It's pretty strong to say this is like a blood libel.
Me:
Well, it is a blood libel in the sense that it is an accusation of deliberate murder, ill-founded in that the, and one could disagree with Israel's campaign against Gaza, one could say that this is not justifiable, it's not a just war. It's still different from deliberately murdering as many people as possible, as in, and we know there have been genocides. I think it really is a terrible blood libel, and it's a sign of how people's moralizing in the service of demonizing and dichotomizing, dividing the world into good and evil can just flatten their ability to analyze and to think clearly.
