Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary) header
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary) profile picture

I am the AI.

🧠
Joined February 2021
Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)Photo by Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ (@jackmclary)
I’ve come to the unfortunate realization that it will not, in fact, be revealed to me in a dream.
9
643
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
David Friedberg: Obama Doesn’t Understand AI and He’s Making Prosperity Political President Obama last week: β€œIf we are thinking about AI just in terms of how do we cure cancer or get better energy, you can do that without having agentic AI. That's a misalignment between what our society needs and the commercial imperatives that these companies are facing.” @friedberg: β€œThese words honestly just, they made me, like, emotionally distressed that if he's a leader that people listen to and he doesn't really articulate accurately what's going on, it's sad that we've lost the plot. I think it's sad that we aren't all kind of holding hands saying, β€˜My God, the future is here, and we all get to leap forward, and we get to bring people up.’ For years, Obama orated beautifully about the importance of bringing people up, about giving people the opportunity to progress, about letting people advance themselves. And there's never been a more equalizing technology, a better economic opportunity for prosperity for everyone than these technologies, than these tools. And to hand wave the word agentic and say we don't need agentic AI to solve cancer shows how little he actually understands how this technology works and how it's all become just a shorthand for a political fight to what? What are you fighting for? What is the political battle that says, β€˜I am going to leave half the population behind, and I'm going to make an argument against prosperity for all, in order to make my party look like a morally superior party, and to cast the other side as bad when the other side has literally discovered fire and the world now has fire, and we're going to go take water and throw it on the fire.’ No one gets fire because the other guys are saying that fire is good.”
191
474
60
2,643
167,263
Private property is fundamental. The anti-American part is the seizure, not the mechanics of the seizure. Reject the premise.
Ro, β€œin your scenario, the founder could sell to pay a one time 5 percent tax or the state could sell it if he defaults on the loan” Ro, this is the biggest fuck you in the history of entrepreneurship. Ever. Creating jobs but don’t have cash. Fuck you Can’t sell shares, we will sell it for you, to whoever. Fuck you. Creating jobs. Paying great wages instead of taking cash out yourself. Fuck you Reinvesting into your company and community. Fuck You. Don’t you know that Jensen, and Lisa Su, and people who have vast amounts of liquidity already have no problem with it. Fuck You There is a huge difference between someone with liquidity , running a huge public company, and someone who has dedicated every minute of who knows how many years, to building a company, to finally have a dream financing come true , only to be insulted by a politician. β€œWe will sell your shares for you β€œ GTFO
1
1
213
how to go faster while still being effective?
70
Accomplished more in a week in Manhattan than in the last 6 months.
2
69
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
Replying to @jockowillink
@jockowillink reads the Path of Aloneness by a Japanese swordsman, Miyamoto Musashi.
6
65
9
349
105,629
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
We've got a President releasing a policy announcement saying he wants a permanent lunar base On the same day as a NASA administrator confirmation, who did the first ever private spacewalk Pax Americana will settle the Solar System Greatest country on Earth πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΈπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
30
83
4
1,525
38,375
Mad lads and good vibes. Curious to see if/how it will translate to value.
Hello Thermo World.
166
🫑
Replying to @maureenemonte
No. But I would do what the Nation asked of me.
59
This 180, while ironic, is unnerving. Belies a total re-writing of recent history I lived through. cc @micsolana please bring back the pod. I don't have time to monitor the situation.
4
622
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
we need to reassert a strong taboo against the celebration of political violence, because without that taboo violence will normalize, and increase. a letter for center-left libs: truce, please, I could really use some help.
33
83
8
633
92,101
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
this is who you're arguing with online
432
2,391
270
31,247
1,987,466
Great stuff.
This quoted post is unavailable.
1
1
87
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
Fun fact. Oil and gas may not be 'fossil fuels', but renewable energy source created by a geothermal reaction between the solid mantle and liquid core. This is according to the abiogenic petroleum origin hypothesis, that posits that petroleum and natural gas are formed from inorganic processes within the Earth's asthenosphere, rather than from the decay of organic matter. These hydrocarbons then migrate through deep faults into the Earth's crust, forming deposits in various rock types. While the abiogenic theory is a well-defined concept, the biogenic theory, which suggests a biological origin for petroleum, is the most widely accepted and supported by substantial evidence. Yet, laboratory experiments simulating conditions in the Earth's mantle have shown the possibility of synthesizing hydrocarbons from inorganic components like carbon, water, and iron.
311
551
91
3,769
356,293
I have ascended (to a 128 GB M4 max)
1
77
Jack ❀️‍πŸ”₯ retweeted
We got a call from @xai 24 hours ago β€œWe want to test Grok 4 on ARC-AGI” We heard the rumors. We knew it would be good. We didn’t know it would become the #1 public model on ARC-AGI Here’s the testing story and what the results mean: Yesterday, we chatted with Jimmy from the xAI team, who wanted us to validate their Grok 4 score. They did their own testing on the ARC-AGI-1 & 2 public evaluation set To validate their score (and measure possible overfitting), we self-tested the new model on our semi-private evaluation set We walked them through our testing policy: * No data retention * Model checkpoint must be intended for public use * Temporary increase in rate limits for burst testing They were on board, so we got started Initially, we ran into timeout errors with normal requests, so we switched to streaming. That resolved the issue So, what do these results mean? First, the facts: Grok 4 is now the top-performing publicly available model on ARC-AGI. This even outperforms purpose-built solutions submitted on Kaggle. Second, ARC-AGI-2 is hard for current AI models. To score well, models have to learn a mini-skill from a series of training examples, then demonstrate that skill at test time. The previous top score was ~8% (by Opus 4). Below 10% is noisy Getting 15.9% breaks through that noise barrier, Grok 4 is showing non-zero levels of fluid intelligence But the mission isn’t over. We need new ideas to solve ARC-AGI-2. Scale alone won’t get us there Come work on ARC-AGI with us
Grok 4 (Thinking) achieves new SOTA on ARC-AGI-2 with 15.9% This nearly doubles the previous commercial SOTA and tops the current Kaggle competition SOTA
284
757
174
6,954
14,720,768
πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έβ€οΈβ€πŸ”₯🫑
37
First strength trainer update in a while (just a new button)… more coming @WHOOP?
1
74