Veteran. E/acc. Owner in part - Green Bay Packers ๐Ÿง€

New York, USA
Joined July 2009
A hike in Iceland in 4 pics ๐Ÿฅพ๐Ÿ‡ฎ๐Ÿ‡ธ
35
11
1
152
29,078
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @TSLAFanMtl
My Mom is 76. After she bought her new Model Y in February 2026, 98% of her miles were self-driving. I know plenty of other older people too who have had no issues transitioning. No doubt there will be some hardheads, but there won't be as much resistance as most think. The hardest part is just getting people to try it that first time.
8
4
2
101
3,956
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Teslaโ€™s Optimus training regime leak. Workers in its Palo Alto R&D facility have been holding โ€œrobot universityโ€ for many months already. Press got it wrong when they said it just started up. Workers are wearing 24 lb suits with up to 40 cameras and grids of 3D sensors. To capture very detailed video and 3D fields of whatever the worker does. There are multiple configurations. They are given different tasks to do. They donโ€™t know where the tasks come from. Multiple squads are working on three shifts 24 hours a day. Similar efforts were seen at the Texas factory. The data collection effort is immense. A Tesla car only has nine cameras. This leads to a data flywheel that is orders of magnitude more data than the car captured. Separate teams are capturing home data, like making a sandwich, while other teams capture jobs on factory floor, like installing HVAC systems in cars. Elon isnโ€™t playing around. I canโ€™t tell you how I learned this.
69
53
11
729
30,587
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
It took Waymo ~3x longer to get to the same Robotaxi service area Tesla now offers only 16 months after starting driverless operations:
36
47
8
577
36,094
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Train Crossings seem to be an Achilles heel for FSD. Many examples of FSD not recognizing the gate arms, or traffic control arms of any sort. I think this is why we see the super long rides on Robotaxi to avoid train crossings.
6
2
17
1,409
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @TSLAFanMtl
If youโ€™re a robotaxi network operator and you donโ€™t manufacture your own vehicles, youโ€™re at an extreme disadvantage vs the ones who do. Waymoโ€™s Ojai Robotaxi costs half what the Jaguar I-Pace did, yet itโ€™s still ~3x more expensive than what it costs Tesla to build a Cybercab.
15
15
4
256
7,929
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
It never gets old meeting your Tesla halfway as itโ€™s being summoned to you in a parking lot. Walking in front of it to make it stop and jumping in, then looking around and seeing the stunned looks of shoppers around you. Itโ€™s priceless. ๐Ÿ˜†
8
2
36
974
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
I cannot believe that @X has taken away my monetization and has asked me to appeal on a broken link! โ›“๏ธโ€๐Ÿ’ฅ Who do I go to for help because this is unfair! I did nothing wrong.
13
3
1
24
2,415
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
The sheer fucking hypocrisy surrounding Elon Musk is breathtaking. For decades, billionaire-funded foundations have financed advocacy groups, political campaigns, legal organizations, and efforts to reshape public policy. George Soros is one of the most prominent examples. And somehow that influence is routinely presented as enlightened philanthropy. Then Elon Musk enters politics, spends openly, challenges powerful institutions, and suddenly the entire establishment discovers the dangers of billionaire influence. Give me a fucking break. The man has built companies that launch rockets, connect the world through satellites, manufacture vehicles, and advance technologies with enormous implications for humanity. His long-term ambition is to make civilization multiplanetary. He has a profound personal interest in a future where technological progress remains possible. You can disagree with his politics. But pretending heโ€™s just another billionaire looking for influence ignores the extraordinary scale of what heโ€™s actually trying to accomplish.
385
1,133
73
7,220
480,231
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
In free nations, we investigate crimes to see who is guilty of them. In communist tyrannies, they investigate men to see what they can be punished for.
310
2,781
85
28,647
717,399
Imagine plugging in your Roadster to charge, pressing the little button on the charge port handle, and instead of a little dinky charge door opening up, the Roadsterโ€™s wing raises & a carbon fiber door slides neatly inward. THAT would never get old to witness. @DMC_Ryan
8
572
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Why are Democrats going after Elon Musk with everything they have? It's not because he's a billionaire in politics. They've been perfectly comfortable with billionaires in politics for decades. They're going after him because he's the first one playing against them. Look at the numbers. Soros's Democracy PAC had put over $100 million into this midterm cycle before the summer was even over. Only a tiny fraction of it shows up under his own name. Then add the advocacy arm of his foundations, which doesn't have to disclose all of its political spending. And that's just the visible part. Over 40 years, tens of billions have gone into NGOs, universities, legal networks and media projects that shape what counts as an "acceptable" opinion. That's the real game. Billionaires have been buying politicians for decades, on every side. But the smartest ones figured something out: you don't buy a candidate, you buy the ecosystem. Universities, foundations, newsrooms, NGOs, regulators, courts. Once you control who writes the reports, who trains the lawyers and who decides what counts as "misinformation", elections become a detail. For 30 years that ecosystem leaned one way. Nobody called it oligarchy. They called it "civil society." Then Musk showed up. He bought the main public square, took the filters off, and started spending in the open, under his own name. Yes, he's the biggest donor of these midterms. Everyone can see exactly how much he gave and to whom. That's the difference. One plays in daylight, the other plays through a maze of structures. And suddenly, billionaire money in politics became a threat to democracy. This isn't really about left versus right. It's about an ideology that captured these institutions and leads straight into a wall. More regulation, less building. More process, less progress. Countries shutting down working nuclear plants. A decade to approve a power line. A system whose default answer to any ambition is "no." Musk is the opposite. Reusable rockets. Mass-market EVs. Satellite internet for the whole planet. Brain-computer interfaces. A serious plan to make humanity multiplanetary. You can hate his tweets. You can't deny that no one in the last 20 years has pushed the frontier of what humanity can build further than he has. That's why they need to break him. Not because of his money. Because he proves the system can be bypassed. If we leave the system as it is, we don't get a catastrophe. We get something worse: slow, comfortable stagnation. A civilization that manages its own decline instead of building its future.
Everyone in Europe argues about the symptoms. Almost nobody looks at the plumbing: who funds the people who write the norms, litigate before the courts and set the boundaries of the debate. Take the best-documented case: the Open Society Foundations, created by George Soros. Over a billion dollars a year. Roughly $32 billion given away since 1984. Not a single voter ever approved one of those dollars. The model is simple and ruthless. You don't need to win an election. You fund NGOs, think tanks, legal clinics, university programs. They produce reports, train lawyers, run strategic litigation. And some of those people end up inside the institutions. Concrete example: the European Court of Human Rights. A 2020 report found that at least 22 of the 100 permanent judges between 2009 and 2019 came from seven NGOs that are highly active before that same Court. Open Society is the main one, and it funds the other six. The worst part: in 88 cases, 18 judges sat on the bench while the NGO they came from was the applicant, the representative or an intervening party. In any listed company, that's called a conflict of interest. None of this is illegal. That's exactly the hack. These institutions were designed to protect themselves from governments and parties. Nobody planned for a private actor funding the entire chain: the plaintiff, the expert, the lawyer, and sometimes yesterday's colleague who is now the judge. Same logic in Brussels: a dedicated policy advocacy institute, tens of millions flowing to NGOs at the heart of the EU, and Open Society among the largest private donors to the Council of Europe. And the money? Soros made his fortune speculating, most famously against the British pound in 1992. But let's be precise: the foundation doesn't make money, it spends it. The return isn't financial, it's normative. Shaping the rules is worth more than any dividend. So stop shouting "Soros" like an incantation. It gets engagement and changes nothing. The problem is structural: any billionaire, left or right, could do exactly the same thing tomorrow. Many already do. What we should demand is rules. Full transparency on the funding of NGOs that litigate before European courts and institutions. Public declarations of interest for judges. Automatic recusal. Traceability of foreign money in lobbying. Stop staring at the puppets. Look at the plumbing. Whoever funds the infrastructure of the debate always ends up writing its conclusions.
46
719
40
2,065
34,698
Yes.
I will never forget the day that I watched Democrats refuse to stand for Iryna Zarutskaโ€™s mother at the State of the Union. It was so shockingly evil, that even while I watched it, I could barely believe it. Honestly, I still canโ€™t. It was so insanely radicalizing.
1
1
1
35
1,276
Another banger
SI: Slopcore Intelligence โœจClaudia: AI Keeps Getting Stronger Where Are We Going Genesis๐ŸŽž๏ธ @ๅฅฅๅˆฉๅฅฅๆณกๆณก
2
393
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Replying to @Tesla
@Tesla ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™ please fix Cybertruck control buttons overlapping issue on iPhone Duo in folded state. I normally open the tailgate with an app and already miss-clicked toneau cover buttons multiple times which never happened before. ๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™๐Ÿ™
1
1
7
401
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
Now that I've had the iPhone Duo for 24 hours, here are my thoughts: Adhesive on the case is a non-issue. The Apple case fits nicely, its hard plastic (I was expecting a more grippy silicone feel). You likely don't even need the adhesive. I don't miss Face ID. I do think that having a watch to unlock the Duo makes it infinitely better/quicker. Then you only need your finger for using Apple Pay or passwords. I find myself looking at the camera for a second to authorize something and then realizing. I imagine that'll muscle memory will change in a few weeks. I like the smaller folded form factor more than I thought I would. I find myself using the outside screen more than I thought I would. With non-optimized apps the screen area is kind of comically small. Unfolded it's a great size for two handed use. I don't find the phone to be too heavy. I do use the split keyboard as it's easier to type that way. I have a nano textured iPad, and the matte screen unfolded reminds me a lot of that. No complaints so far. Not too many apps optimized for the Duo yet. I imagine that will change quickly, I'm not too concerned. Coming from a 16 Pro Max I can already tell battery life is a huge step up. Seems like it'll easily last a full day. I hope Apple/third parties come out with a good Duo magsafe wallet. The wallet is just a bit too tall for the Duo but will still attach. Haven't taken many pictures yet but the camera seems perfectly fine. My daughter loves the Kid Cue screens. It is weird to take a picture with it unfolded as the camera orientation is 90 degrees off what you'd expect. Overall, I'm surprised a how much I like the Duo so far. Have any questions? Let me know!
With most cases I liked having adhesive, I decided to try out the Apple case as every other third party case won't ship till November or December.. I just can't go caseless on the iPhone Duo when it costs $2600
32
16
6
632
198,241
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
I donโ€™t think the @liberal_party realizes how much consumers will hold them accountable next time they vote due to this mistake. ie: BC.
28
31
3
614
22,652
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
1 month review: LG UltraGear 45GX950A 45" OLED After 9 years on a dual 27" LG setup, here's how the switch to a single ultrawide is going: โœ… Picture quality is top notch โœ… The OLED blacks are so good โœ… Way less head turning. Active windows stay front and center โœ… The 800R curve hasn't been disorienting for work at all โœ… Mac scaling works just fine (I was nervous about this one) โœ… Stand and power brick are absolute beasts, but build quality is great โš ๏ธ After powering on the display for the first time, I noticed lines down both sides. I did a bit of digging, decided to run image cleaning, and about 10 minutes later the lines were gone. They have not returned at all since! When it comes to window placement, I have been a longtime BetterSnapTool user and it just so happens to work great with the UltraGear display by allowing me to save my window layout. That means I'm just one keyboard shortcut away from snapping everything back into place after I connect my MacBook Pro back to the display. Really glad I upgraded. Gaming PC is the next thing coming for the full experience!
5
2
16
1,559
For whatever you think of the NY Times news service, their Cooking app is superb. Itโ€™s $50 /yr & well worth it. The recipes often teach me something new, theyโ€™re fresh & constantly evolving, the app is fantastic, and the user comments are useful & engaging. Highly recommend. ๐Ÿ‘ (But fuck the NYT for their news articles)
2
4
642
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
I left the Democrats a few months ago and somehow started aging backward. Iโ€™m 44, but people think Iโ€™m in my 30โ€™s. No more constant outrage, guilt, or doomscrolling. Stress ages you. My dermatologist asked what changed. I told her I stopped treating every Trump headline like a personal emergency. Friends keep asking if I got work done. Nope. I just stopped treating normal life like a human rights violation. Turns out, perpetual outrage is terrible for your complexion. Leaving the Democrats was the best decision I ever made. My skin agrees.
944
222
61
3,055
161,152
FSD Pilot (Unsupervised) ๐Ÿ›ฉ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ retweeted
If Democrats get power, they will: 1. Lawfare Trump officials; 2. Pack SCOTUS; 3. Go after Elon, SpaceX, and Tesla--then billionaires, then millionaires; 4. Crush free speech; 5. Make voter ID illegal; 6. Flood the country with illegals. It sounds insane. It *is* insane.
1,076
2,226
187
15,921
4,668,979