James Coates (@jcoatesuk) header
James Coates (@jcoatesuk) profile picture

Dad | Boss | BTC guy | 80% Introverted | Busy Building My Ark Every Single Day

United Kingdom
Joined May 2022
Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)Photo by James Coates (@jcoatesuk)
James Coates retweeted
It's now too late! - The Vexed Vicar
770
2,287
232
8,405
563,498
James Coates retweeted
He's back @JulianAssange
2,572
14,186
1,317
94,812
20,591,654
James Coates retweeted
I've decided to step down as CEO of Twenty One. This wasn't an easy decision, but it was the right one. This experience brought tremendous clarity about who I am and what I want to build. My life's work remains Bitcoin. My Bitcoin company is @Strike. The work continues.
1,798
547
389
7,870
2,072,747
James Coates retweeted
Exactly what the financial-industrial complex is doing with Bitcoin right now. They want to custody your Bitcoin while encouraging you to lever up and borrow against it, so they can margin-call you when they scoop it up on the cheap. They want BlackRock, Strategy, Coinbase, or a Cantor-connected Bitcoin treasury company to hold your Bitcoin. They want your Bitcoin wrapped in Michael Saylor, Brandon Lutnick, Adam Back, David Bailey, Jack Mallers, Steve Witkoff, Eric Trump, or Donald Trump Jr. instead of held in your own self-custody. Understand the difference between owning Bitcoin and owning a financial product built around Bitcoin. One moves you closer to sovereignty. The other moves Bitcoin closer to the financial-industrial complex. Your choice.
A 1973 Wikileaks cable shows primary dealers explicitly planned to use gold futures volatility to "diminish initial demand for physical holding and negate long-term hoarding by US citizens." @chrismartenson reads it in black and white.
38
196
17
953
79,355
The average student graduates after 12 years of schooling and still cannot answer the most important questions in life. What is a good man? What is justice? What is worth sacrificing for? What is beauty? What is truth? What is the purpose of life? Classical education begins with the assumption that any education failing to address these questions is not really education at all.
169
1,084
77
6,796
1,660,871
James Coates retweeted
Meta cut 8,000 people today. A survivor wrote about a teammate who slept 4 hours a night for months. Commits at 3am. Commits at 6am. IC4. Strong reviews. No PIP. Cut anyway. Working harder doesn't move you up the layoff list. You don't survive by being valuable to them. You survive by not needing them.
299
519
117
4,447
1,177,078
James Coates retweeted
£400,000. Fifteen years from retirement. Forty five years of work behind it. In five years it buys what £223,362 buys today. £176,638 stolen. Not in tax. In purchasing power. The grandchild's degree. The daughter's deposit. The son's business. Gone before you have spent a penny. Bailey sets the rate. Reeves sells the debt. Starmer signs the cheques. Three people. One robbery. Your family pays. The thief is not at your door. The thief is in your government. Your life raft is Bitcoin, get on it bloody quickly as time is running out.
24
48
5
203
16,279
James Coates retweeted
If more people put the same amount of energy into building their income as they do trying to trade their way to wealth, they would probably reach their financial goals so much faster, and with a much higher likelihood of success. Not to mention becoming far more marketable, self-sufficient, and scalable along the way. Eventually, most people find out the hard way when they don’t strike it, that they need something real and consistent to fall back on or more importantly, to make consistent progress. The market isn’t handing out free lunches. Most of the stories that make it seem otherwise are closer to infomercials than reality for all.
75
61
6
1,203
100,866
Replying to @ZackPolanski
We have 156 billionaires in the UK If you took away ALL their wealth it would fund benefits for 2 years That's it Hardly the basis for a sustainable fiscal policy I suggest you go learn some basic economics
157
984
30
6,439
81,805
James Coates retweeted
🇯🇵A Japanese developer built an app that puts a fat cat on your screen and forces you to take a break Silicon Valley spent billions on wellness platforms, mindfulness subscriptions, and digital detox retreats A guy in Japan said: fat cat, problem solved
450
3,064
343
24,898
1,424,016
James Coates retweeted
To anyone in the UK worried or concerned about this: - Peer to peer trading of Bitcoin between individuals is not and has never been illegal in the UK. It's not even regulated by the FCA. - Bitcoin now has statutory legal recognition as property in the UK pursuant to English law. Any holder of Bitcoin remains free to deal with it, hold it, or send it peer to peer for fiat cash if they so wish. - This FCA action (taken under the Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds (Information on the Payer) Regulations 2017) was likely against organisations or institutions operating without appropriate FCA licences to perform cryptoasset activities (but more info needed). We need to monitor the progress of this investigation carefully to understand how and why they are attacking the rights of individuals to deal with their property, and understand how to guard against this attack, and ensure that such attacks are defeated in future. Oh, and entirely unrelated to this, of course, please check out @vexl , @peachbitcoin , @hodlhodl , @bisq_network , @RoboSats or @Azteco_
We led our first on-site operation targeting illegal peer-to-peer crypto trading, with @HMRCgovUK and @SWROCU Peer-to-peer trading is when individuals buy and sell crypto directly with each other, rather than using a centralised exchange. Any unregistered peer-to-peer crypto traders operating in the UK are doing so illegally. Collaboration across regulatory and law enforcement partners is key to fighting financial crime and keeping markets clean. fca.org.uk/news/press-releas… #FightingFinancialCrime #MoneyLaundering #FinancialRegulation
16
63
8
342
47,424
James Coates retweeted
Bitcoin allows people to own their own money, like cash and gold, without a custodian, and can be used globally. It enables person-to-person transactions on an “innocent until proven guilty” basis, unlike any money that relies on a custodian. BTC has a fixed supply that will never change, allowing me to plan decades ahead without a central banker altering the rules or diluting my value. It also provides a way to capture value from otherwise wasted electricity, a small price to pay for the benefits it offers to anyone. It’s the most net-positive form of money for society since cash. Gold was a natural gift. Bitcoin is an invented gift. It’s arguably the only real way to exit the financial-industrial complex and boycott the harms that traditional financial products may support. How is that a net negative?
Because btc doesn't produce anything or increase overall GDP, the increase in btc price is paid for by the purchasing power of new users alone. That and the massive opportunity cost caused by the mining, means it's a net negative for society. Basically the worlds biggest ponzi
71
107
7
670
40,513
A person just solved a BTC block on @Parasite_wtf with only 4.8TH 👀 Probably something like a NerdQAxe++ And they just earned 1 full Bitcoin! $76,000 from a $380 home miner. Not bad.
39
41
5
420
18,888
I’m sorry but this is absolutely ridiculous
806
1,615
130
9,393
513,210
Great question When a bank issues a loan, it does not loan out deposits. It creates new money as a credit entry     You sign a loan agreement & it becomes an asset for the bank     Bank credits your account & the new deposit becomes new money in circulation Banks are credit creators rather than intermediaries Bank-created money is created with interest Because the interest is not created in the money supply, the system requires perpetual growth, constant new debt or defaults This is why the private credit system is inherently inflationary & extractive over time Governments do not create new money to spend directly They instead issue bonds purchased by banks, pension funds, foreign governments, or the central bank This is government borrowing which is printing by selling promises Government-issued money is also interest-bearing, which means it has the same inflationary dynamic as private bank credit creation Tax serve 3 functions in a fiat system 1 Prevent inflation from excess government spending. If governments printed unlimited money, it would raise spending power without increasing production & create inflation. Taxes remove money from circulation, acting as a drain on the system 2 Give the currency value. If the government requires taxes to be paid in its currency, that alone creates demand 3 Redistribute and fund services. Funding services are not the main monetary reason, that’s the political justification. The monetary purpose is inflation control & currency demand Governments spend money into the economy & taxes destroy part of that money to keep the system alive This is the part people misunderstand the most If new money is printed but does not create new goods, new services, new infrastructure or new real output, then you get more money chasing the same amount of goods, which raises prices Examples:     Money printing for bailouts, war spending not tied to productive output, stimulus without corresponding output growth, interest-bearing credit expansion for consumption This type of money requires taxation to remove excess money & prevent inflation If new money is issued to create new productive output, the money supply increases in proportion to real wealth Examples:    Building infrastructure, funding energy projects, paying workers to produce real goods & services or capital investments with measurable output If production rises faster than money supply, no inflation occurs In such cases, taxation is not required to offset the issuance, because real-world value backs the currency expansion After the Weimar hyperinflation & Great Depression, Germany introduced Mefo Bills in 1934     It was a government-created promissory note issued to construction & industrial companies     They were not backed by gold, not borrowed from banks, backed by future labor & productive output & used to fund public work    Money was issued only when workers produced output     Idle labor was turned into productive labor     Factories, infrastructure & goods increased alongside the money supply    The credit carried no compounding interest & money was created only to mobilize productive capacity, not consumption or speculation When money creation matches real productivity, inflation does not occur Germany reduced unemployment from 30% to 0% in a few years without runaway inflation Inflation problems emerged later only when issuance shifted to unproductive military expansion Today’s system is a public–private hybrid Banks create most money via credit, charge interest & expand the money supply Governments issue bonds purchased by banks & central banks, borrow the currency they themselves issue & tax to control inflation created by both government & private banks The government effectively outsourced money creation to private banks & then taxes you to stabilize the system for banks profit They socialize the losses & privatize the gains. It’s a ponzi scheme & you pay taxes to service the interest on banks debt.
I have a question, might be the wrong questions, but I still have it. Q: if banks print money by using the credit system and governments print money by selling promises(basically same thing) but to other governments/institutions. Why do we pay taxes? What is the link BANK/GOV?
84
364
75
1,342
228,310
James Coates retweeted
Deleverage your hard money. NOT leverage it. They are trying hard to get your Bitcoin.
JUST IN: 🇺🇸 $4.3 trillion mortgage provider Fannie Mae to accept crypto-backed mortgages, WSJ reports.
28
54
5
583
40,014
James Coates retweeted
I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. The company is worth a quarter of a trillion dollars. I did not misspeak. Two hundred and forty-nine billion. The stock is up 320% in the past 12 months. The product is surveillance. I do not use that word at conferences. At conferences, I say "data integration," "operational intelligence," or "decision advantage." These mean the same thing. Surveillance is the honest version. I save the honest version for rooms where honesty is a competitive advantage. I gave a speech on March 3 at the Andreessen Horowitz American Dynamism Summit. "American Dynamism" is the fund's label for military technology. The name makes it sound like a fitness supplement. The fund's thesis is that defending the nation is a market opportunity. I agree with the thesis. The thesis made me a billionaire. Agreement is the product. I sell it at scale. Here is what I said, verbatim, to a room of six hundred people whose combined net worth exceeds the GDP of Portugal: "If Silicon Valley believes we are going to take away everyone's white-collar job and you're gonna screw the military — if you don't think that's gonna lead to nationalization of our technology, you're retarded." I used that word. The word is on the clip. The clip has eleven million views. My communications team asked me not to repeat it, which is how I know they are still employed. They will not be reprimanded. The clip is performing well. The stock went up. The word cost me nothing. The nothing is the point. Let me explain what I meant by nationalization. I meant it. I am telling the technology industry that if they refuse to cooperate with the United States military, the government will seize their technology. I am telling them this at a venture capital conference, on a stage designed to look like a living room. The living room had throw pillows. The throw pillows cost more than the median American's monthly rent. I sat on one. It was comfortable. Comfort is the setting in which I discuss compulsion. The audience laughed. I want to be precise about that. They laughed. I was not joking. Nationalization is the seizure of private assets by the state. I am a private asset. I am telling an audience of billionaires that the state should seize technology from companies that do not cooperate with the military, and the billionaires are laughing, because they believe I am only talking about the other companies. I am talking about the other companies. Three weeks before my speech, the Pentagon designated Anthropic a "supply chain risk." Anthropic is an AI company. They had red lines. The red lines said: if our AI is used for lethal autonomous weapons, we stop. If capability outpaces safety, we stop. The Pentagon assessed the red lines as a threat to the supply chain. The company that wanted to verify the safety feature worked was designated the risk. The company that agreed the safety feature could be decorative got the contract. The company that got the contract was OpenAI. OpenAI signed a deal with the same Pentagon. The terms are not public. The timing was hours after Anthropic was blacklisted. The speed was noted. The speed was the point. The lesson was the speed: the market for military AI does not pause for ethics. It pauses for nothing. It accelerates through objections. I know this because I built the runway. Two hundred thousand people joined a campaign called #QuitGPT. They signed a petition asking OpenAI to honor its original charter, the one that said the company existed to benefit humanity. The charter is on their website. The contract is also on their website. The charter and the Pentagon contract occupy the same domain. This is not a contradiction. This is a business model. The charter is the marketing. The contract is the product. I run a surveillance company. We have contracts with the Department of Defense worth more than a billion dollars. We have contracts with ICE. We have contracts with intelligence agencies whose names I am not permitted to say at venture capital conferences, even ones with throw pillows. Our software has been used to track undocumented immigrants. Our software has been used for things I am not permitted to describe in this format. The revenue from the things I cannot describe exceeds the revenue from the things I can. The ACLU called our ICE contracts a system for tracking and deporting families. They were correct. The contracts continued. The families continued to be tracked. The ACLU issued a statement. We issued a statement. The statements were different. The tracking was the same. The company is named Palantir. The palantíri are the seeing stones from Tolkien. In the novels, Sauron captured one and used it to corrupt everyone who looked into the others. I named a surveillance company after a surveillance device from a novel about the corruption of power. I have a doctorate in social theory. I have read the books. Here is the thing I want you to understand. I am not threatening anyone. A threat implies uncertainty. There is no uncertainty. The technology industry will cooperate with the military. The companies that cooperate first will be the richest. The companies that cooperate last will be acquired by the companies that cooperated first. The companies that refuse will be designated supply chain risks, and their technology will be obtained through procurement channels that do not require consent. I am describing a process. The process has already started. Anthropic is proof. OpenAI is proof. I am not a warning. I am a narrator. The narration is the product. The revenue was $3.12 billion last year. Up thirty-three percent. The analysts say we are overvalued. The analysts have said this for four consecutive years. Each year the stock doubles. Each year, the analysts adjust their models. The models were wrong four times. I was wrong zero times. The market rewards prediction. My prediction is that every AI company will work for the military within three years. The prediction is on the clip, next to the slur. The audience gave me a standing ovation. The ovation lasted nine seconds. I timed it. I time everything. The water was San Pellegrino. The throw pillows were from Restoration Hardware. The future of American technology was decided between the sparkling water, the nine seconds of applause, and a word I am not supposed to repeat. I am the CEO of Palantir Technologies. I am worth more than the combined annual budgets of Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania. I named my company after a corrupting surveillance device from a fantasy novel. I told six hundred billionaires that the government should nationalize their competitors. They applauded. I used a slur. Eleven million people watched. The stock is up. The philosopher does not threaten. The philosopher describes. What I described is already happening.
1,889
4,087
1,246
20,184
5,476,366
James Coates retweeted
Behold, #Bitcoin’s Proof Of Work.
30
181
30
934
222,237