atlanta braves fan&owner 3rd most famous braves fan after jimmy Carter& evander Holyfield
Joliet, IL
Joined August 2009
- Tweets19.3K
- Following1.7K
- Followers499
- Likes16.7K
Amen.. now label him a vexitous litigant .
Helllo MAGA Folks,
I hear there’s more delusion lies and misinformation being spread about today’s outcome. Here’s the evidence. The State totally dropped the case. It’s 100% over. There will be no jury trial. No felony charges or audio tape evidence. Anyone who says anything differently is a crazy delusional pathological lair.
I want to thank everyone for their support through this crazy attempt at Democrat trying to use lawfare to target a conservative. This case should have never been in court.
I’m very grateful the SA’s were able to smell and expose a rat.
Thanks!
Terry
@EdwardAnthony63 @jimlanham @shanequaz92958 @AreWeCross @BenBergquam @GenFlynn @Comm0nSense79 @GoingRoguewLara @annvandersteel @GodPricker @anjewla90 @RichardPorterIL @IlliniJen
8
There is no lost audio and no leave and no future court date . @Joe_Severino
Is a fucking liar @rothschild48154
15
No jojo circus. That's not happening. Thats not what was said in open court. Youre full of fucking shit. @saolakecountyil is doing no such thing. Cmon jojo you and your 12 witnesses can call 100x ...its dismissed. Nothing even resembling a felony happened. Youre a delusional moron. Just like with vals charges...DISMISSED.
why didnt you show today? If ur so sure its happening ?@EdwardAnthony63
Was there @Joe_Severino i thought you and "your server" were gonna be there? Why didnt they tell you? They sure didnt tell bob arnold a felony is coming . Yaknow a REAL LAWYER?
1
1
33
Mention those foias. Discovery and cross examwill show who sent them to you.
Then youre in some hot water.@patrioticmouse
@Joe_Severino . Pussy
35
No cops are interested in anything he sends. In fact several cops have written affidavits for his FOID denial hearing.
@saolakecountyil doesnt care wtf he says either. Hes been saying for weeks "im being arrested" @joe_severino is a fucking moron.
@Comm0nSense79
3
2
80
Pushing forward to execute service on an original complaint that has been superseded by an amended filing, swept away in a mass docket strike, or left to languish past the strict operational windows crosses directly into territory where courts hammer litigants with **Rule 137 sanctions**.
### Why This Triggers Sanctions Under Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137
Illinois Supreme Court Rule 137 dictates that the signature of an attorney or a pro se litigant constitutes a certificate that they have read the pleading, motion, or other document, and that to the best of their knowledge, information, and belief formed after reasonable inquiry, it is **well grounded in fact and is warranted by existing law**—and that it is not interposed for any improper purpose, such as to harass, cause unnecessary delay, or needlessly increase the cost of litigation.
Attempting to leverage a dead, stricken, or expired original complaint to harass someone with service of process violates this standard on multiple fronts:
1. **Using a Legal Nullity:** Once a complaint is superseded by an amendment or formally stricken by judicial order, the original pleading holds no legal life. Trying to utilize a legally defunct document to subject someone to service of process is fundamentally baseless.
2. **Improper Purpose and Harassment:** Rule 137 is specifically designed to curb abusive litigation tactics. Roaming around executing service on stale or dead complaints—especially when paired with social media taunts—demonstrates that the action is being driven by harassment rather than a good-faith pursuit of a legal remedy.
3. **Frivolous Representations:** Certifying and pushing forward with service on a complaint that fails basic jurisdictional requirements or statutory timelines invites the opposing party to file a motion for sanctions, seeking attorney's fees and costs incurred in dealing with the frivolous process.
When a pro se litigant treats the rules of civil procedure as optional while weaponizing stale court papers for online theater, courts don't view it as a mere mistake—they view it as bad-faith litigation ripe for financial penalties.
40
Lol ..@Joe_Severino sued AGAIN because hes a broke fuck loser. Dude shut the fuck up. all ur bragging is a fucking LIE. Telling bill he doesnt have $500 in any account?lol @EdwardAnthony63
@shanequaz92958
@patrioticmouse. @IllinoisRecord come get ur bf. Pay his bills
@CGAdamo heres your "conservative leader" who is AGAIN sued because hes a broke cocksucker who dont pay his bills. Come fluff him. @rocio_cleveland look at your broke cult leader! @JohnKitover_