Pinned Tweet
If you want to revitalize a Roman Catholic parish, here’s what you have to do:
Priests (and when applicable, deacons):
1) Offer frequent times for Confession, and no, not just “by appointment”.
“But why would I offer more confession times when people barely come to our Saturday half hour slot?” Just offer it. I can’t tell you how many times I’ve seen priests increase the opportunities for Confession even when it wasn’t in response to a demand, and somehow, people not only started filling up the Saturday time slot, but the others, as well!
2) Offer the traditional Latin Mass, if possible. If not, offer the Novus Ordo as reverently as possible, by following the GIRM and infusing within it any traditional elements, as allowed. The Mass is the most important part of a priest’s life, and its worthy celebration will pay dividends for the life of your local parish. Move away from the 4-hymn sandwich. Prioritize a schola cantorum and the organ. If you can’t yet sing the Propers in Latin, sing them in English!
3) Offer perpetual Eucharistic adoration, if possible. If not, offer Eucharistic adoration frequently. Many people think that the key to fixing a parish is by implementing programs, doing all sorts of activities. There is no pastoral plan greater than the worship and praise of the LORD in the Blessed Sacrament. Put that first, and watch everything fall into place.
4) Preach brief, often, and well. The brevity of homilies allows for people to grasp 1-2 concepts clearly. Info-dumping everything you learned in seminary is not going to result in a successful take-home message. But preach whenever possible: at baptisms, funerals, daily Mass, parish Vespers. Work on your Sunday homily throughout the week. Pray on it. Consult secondary literature, such as biblical commentaries. Don’t avoid preaching on controversial topics.
5) Offer opportunities for parish fellowship. In between Sunday Masses, have coffee and social time. Be present for it. Promote it! In an era dominated by the digital, these sorts of in-person experiences allow authentic community to develop. Young adult (18-30) groups are great. Think also of marriage & family apostolates.
For laity:
1) Show up. Obviously, go to Sunday Mass. But as your schedule allows, attend parish lectures, Bible study, Lauds/Vespers, bazaars and festivals, etc. The American Catholic’s social life was once dominated by the parish. I think it’s time we bring that back.
2) Tithe, donate money, time, and your talents. As appropriate to your current situation, make financial sacrifices to allow the parish to continue its work. Don’t just throw $5 in the basket if you’re driving a Tesla Model X. A good rule of thumb: if you’re spending more money on fast food every month than you are in the collection basket, it’s time to reevaluate your discretionary income.
3) Join parish organizations, like the Knights of Columbus, choir, CCD/Faith formation. Many of the Millennial generation grew up thinking “eh that’s the stuff for the older people.” That’s how these things die (also, we’re starting to become those “older people”). Ask your pastor where your talents meet the parish’s needs.
4) Love your priest (even if you don’t like him!) Do not treat your priest like a sacramental dispenser. Find out his birthday, interests, favorite food. Invite him over for a family dinner or take him out to lunch. While respecting proper boundaries, invite him into your life as an important person. Thank him, and pray for him!
5) Invite someone to Mass with you: a friend, coworker, or even a stranger. You are the primary agent by which the parish engages the world. “Come and see”
___
Certainly, there are more ways to revitalize a Roman Catholic parish, so feel free to list them below. But in every healthy parish I’ve seen, these elements were present. As our Western culture continues to decline and fragment, the parish might be one of the few places we can rebuild it.
📍 Mission San Rafael Arcángel, California
I expect a few responses to this:
First, you’ll have the Fr. Ripperger fanbase saying “LIBERAL bishop silences FAITHFUL PRIEST but the hierarchy does nothing about JAMES MARTIN SJ!”
Second, you’ll have the anti-Ripperger crowd say “Thank GOD the good, pastoral bishop is taking action over this lunatic, anti-Francis renegade exorcist!”
I’d like to offer a better way to read this.
I’m wary of “celebrity priests” in general, and think exorcism-talk requires prudence and reservation. Talking about the intimate details of an exorcism might lead one to the vice of curiositas, an unregulated, disordered appetite for spectacle and “hidden secrets “. But that said, Fr. Ripperger’s ministry has helped tons of people come to knowledge of the Catholic faith, especially on topics not frequently discussed by most public teachers of the Faith.
This “one-year fast from public speaking and interviews” might be a good thing for him and his Society of the Most Sorrowful Mother, insofar as it reminds us that the Christian life is a combination of contemplation and action. Perhaps the bishop has noted that Ripperger’s run on the podcast circuit has distracted the Society from its main goals. Perhaps he wants to test Fr. Ripperger’s obedience and see if he’s truly docile to episcopal authority.
I think Fr. Ripperger is virtuous enough to obey this directive, even if we bystanders might see it as unjust. I would like to see some other bishops or religious superiors ask for a “one year fast” (or in some cases, perpetual) for other popular personalities with an audience, but that’s a tweet for another day.
🚨FATHER CHAD RIPPERGER SILENCED BY HIS BISHOP
"Denver Archbishop James Golka has ordered Fr. Chad Ripperger to cease all public ministry — no talks, no preaching, no writing — for one year."
🎩 @LifeSite @CatholicSOTC
lifesitenews.com/news/breaki…
John A. Monaco retweeted
It’s probably a bad idea to respond to this. But these kind of tweets bother me because they’re designed to create outrage.
There are 137+ Masses per week at Notre Dame, scattered across campus. Steubenville has a single chapel and around 20 Masses per week.
Likewise, there are 1,000 theology majors and minors at Notre Dame. The University President had ND consecrated to the Sacred Heart.
Further, how can you assess the catholicity of a university without engaging in dialogue with students who are more often than not the kind of people that inspire me to be a better Catholic professor, to seek truth together?
Go to Franciscan. Go to ND or Marquette or Incarnate Word or Gonzaga or Loras College. You’ll find vital cultures where faith and reason, intellect and devotion are flourishing.
But don’t trust Bree.
This quoted post is unavailable.
Please join me in praying for Pope Leo XIV, as well as for those who suffer from cancer and who have no one to pray for them.
St. Peregrine, pray for us.
If it is true that the bishop is the “moderator, promoter, and guardian” of the Sacred Liturgy (Traditionis Custodes, Art. 2), then videos like these should cause serious alarm.
The idea of “sacred music” is that it is music set apart and ordered towards divine worship. The fact that a Millennial on TikTok can obnoxiously sing the most common Catholic hymns from 1990 - 2010 as “bangers” shows that the songs were never fit for worship to begin with.
You don’t hear people singing Byzantine troparions or the Latin Kyriale as if they were pop hits to be blasted on the radio (with the accompanying “this song slaps 🤣” commentary). Traditional Catholic chant and hymns evoke a sense of the transcendent and sacred. While the original intentions of Marty Haugen, the St. Louis Jesuits, and other “pastoral musicians” might have been noble, it is clear that the songs were too rooted in the profane, in their rhythms, melodies, accompaniment, to ever be considered “untouchable” from worldly usage.
Catholic liturgy is not your karaoke.
John A. Monaco retweeted
Intelligence must draw on memory. The mind must not simply compile data — as an algorithm now does more quickly than we can — but recall lived experiences, which contain depths of meaning that only the human soul can recognize, and connect more deeply with the goodness of these experiences. Everything that is good begins “with the Spirit” and thus possesses a breath, a dynamism and a sense of communion that, once experienced, are engraved upon the heart. vatican.va/content/leo-xiv/e…
While some people in San Francisco are training voice models instead of reading to their children, others in this city are forming children in truth, goodness, and beauty.
While the world teaches children to scroll, swipe, and prompt, Catholic classical education teaches our children to read, reason, write, debate, sing, and pray.
This is the greatest jewel in a city known for its gold, and it’s not even close.
I'm not big on signing public pledges or petitions. But I did sign this one. Let me briefly explain why.
First of all, I am not "anti-AI". Nor am I "pro-AI". I am a Millennial who grew up in the "in-between" era of having access to Google and having that access get interrupted when my dad accepted a phone call on the landline. Technology has always been a tool, and I've long-realized the danger in embracing technological advancement without discernment.
I use AI for various tasks. As a headmaster, for example, I get tons of emails. Sometimes, I use AI to triage my emails to see which ones contain the most time-sensitive and urgent action items. I also will use AI to create grocery lists based on my finances, which fruits and vegetables are in season, or for Byzantine fasting requirements. Most of the time, I use it for random things I would normally 'Google': "Why were the Eagles so bad in 2012?"; "How can I do [this or that] on iOS vs Android?"; and so forth. AI is a very useful tool.
But as a writer, especially someone who writes on theology, I am very cautious about AI. Sure, AI can “write” a polished essay that sounds intelligent. But writing is more than about putting together sentences based on mathematical probability. Writing a uniquely human activity, one that expresses a depth that a LLM could never, because AI lacks a soul (as @Pontifex reminds us.)
Can AI “write better” than me? Sure. I can be logorrheic, clumsy, and florid. But at the same time, my writing is an authentic, human attempt to grasp what is true, good, and beautiful. My writing—despite its flaws—is a participation in God’s act of creation. Human writing is a fragmented, temporal, and material attempt to do what God does perfectly, eternally, and immaterially in the generation of the Son.
When I publish an essay, the text serves as a sort of image or manifestation of what is in my mind. Although analogies limp here, there is a connection between a person sitting down to write, and the Triune God’s relations among the three Divine Persons. Human writing can serve as an image of the divine at work within us. Prompts and tokens can’t do that.
For me, the "Pledge Against AI Catholic Content and Text" (PAACCT) is less about labeling AI as "bad", and more about ensuring that my participation in God's act of continual creation is undoubtedly mine, an authentic human producing an authentically human act. I want people to know that, when I write essays, they aren't getting some sort of slop mathematically-produced from a prompt, but rather see my own fumbling and wrestling of questions and ideas bigger than myself.
As I see it, the Pledge asks content creators (a term I loathe and cringe to use) to do the following: 1) never use AI to do the writing for them; 2) label anything used as AI; and 3) ban AI's use for sacred images (for this third one, I have greatly appreciated @hmkherman's comments about AI-generated "art" and AI use in general.) Nothing here seems offensive or Luddite in the slightest.
In closing, I am happy that @EamonnClark and @CatholicPods came together to produce this Pledge. I do not look down on anyone who doesn't sign it. But I think it is important for people to know that everything I write on the Church, on God, on theology, is profoundly mine, as a gift I offer back to God (though He has no need for it) and to the Church... even if She contains members who preferred I did not write, at all!
Catholic Culture has just launched the Pledge Against AI Catholic Content and Text (PAACCT)! This statement was signed by a number of Catholic institutions, thinkers, writers, and media producers, standing together to uphold the essential human activities of thought and communication against the ongoing attempt to replace them with AI.
Read the document and see the list of signatories below.
Regarding AI "art"
xitter.cf/hmkherman/status/20705…
Byzantine Catholicism and Eastern Orthodoxy share a tradition with a very high theology of the icon and of human art and creativity in general. It’s therefore ironic to see how frequently representatives of this tradition have recourse to LLMs to produce simulacra of human art.
Such simulacra are incongruent with our understanding of why it’s possible for Christians to paint depictions of Christ and the saints in the first place: because God became man, and so has ennobled our flesh, our eyes, our work (cf. 1 John 1:1–3 and Psalm 89/90:17).
Real icons are painted (or carved or whatever) by human beings created in God’s image (that is, God’s “icon”) and who have physical and spiritual eyes to see and (however dimly) understand the significance of what they’re depicting, eyes that can meet the gaze of the eyes in the icon and commune with the person revealed in those eyes.
Of course, we must make a sharp distinction (because some will try to blur this distinction in response to this tweet) between, on the one hand, photographs and prints and jpegs of real icons, and, on the other, images whose “creators” know nothing of God or man—whose “creators” in fact know nothing at all.
Even in catechetical materials, AI pseudo-iconography has no place. Its presence there militates against the foundations of any true catechesis: what it means to be human, to be creative, and to have a relationship with God and the saints.
(Image: Christ Pantocrator from Hilandar Monastery, Mt. Athos)
John A. Monaco retweeted
In an age dominated by technology, in which efficiency and profit often take precedence, it is so important that we continue to cultivate a spirit of contemplation and allow time and space for beauty. Such an attitude will greatly help humanity, especially young people, to discover the ability of art to uplift and reveal the depths of the human spirit and our openness to the divine. Contemplation presents a marvelous opportunity to encounter the God who is Beauty.
John A. Monaco retweeted
In this era of artificial intelligence, it is becoming urgent to distinguish human art from what machines produce. There is an ontological difference, even before an aesthetic one, between art and what a machine can generate through statistical calculation based on millions of images created by others. Algorithms lack the spark of humanity. For this reason, the Church wishes to renew an alliance with artists and cultural institutions to safeguard our humanity.
Two images of France, less than a week apart.
One rejects her Christian inheritance and the civilization it helped build. The other recalls France as the Church’s eldest daughter—defending human dignity, order, beauty, and peace.
Two visions. One nation. Which way, French man?
Every few months, this curriculum pops up on the TL and the reactions are always the same:
The defenders of classical education champion it as the best thing ever.
The defenders of social efficiency, curriculum fragmentation, and vocationalism think it’s a scandal.
In reality, while there might be some legitimate critiques of TAC’s curriculum—such as moving from a history of ideas in science to treating advancements like evolutionary biology —most of the criticism is rooted in contempt for the past, and a prideful assumption that everything modern is somehow better than the past.
Part of the controversy here is that we’ve completely forgotten the purpose of education and why educational institutions exist. Thomas Aquinas College is an attempt to recover an integrated, rigorous, primary source/Socratic/Great Books approach to the curriculum. “LOL they don’t have an elective in lesbian underwater basket-weaving!” is actually a strength of TAC, not one of its flaws.
Whatever its potential flaws, Thomas Aquinas College regularly produces far more intelligent, well-read, virtuous, integrated, and whole persons than whatever you see coming out of Harvard, Cornell, NYU, state schools, and others.
Modern colleges bear a far greater burden of proof to defend a product being rendered obsolete by AI than Thomas Aquinas College does to defend an integrated, classical study of Western civilization.
I’ve said before and I’ll say it again: Pope Leo XIV is a man of deep prayer and love for Christ and His Church. He is also a man who understands the dignity proper to the papal office, and embraces it as a gift to be shared with the universal Church.
May God protect our pope!
John A. Monaco retweeted
"It seemed certain that at the moment when the Kingdom of heaven would come to touch the earth, it would immediately burst the fragile envelope of time, dissipate sorrow, cast out death, “make all things new,” (Rev. 21:5) and transfigure the universe. Indeed, should it descend for anything other than this? But, behold, on the contrary, that its power is covered with signs of weakness and its grandeur with signs of humility. Behold that its eternity slips silently under the unchanged bark of time. Behold that its felicity is immersed in the very ocean of our trials. It was made so as to disperse suffering, temptations, and death, and behold that it chooses to live in the midst of them so as to tame them, seeking not—alas!—to eliminate them but only to illuminate them. The law of its radiation ought to be a law of the glorious transfiguration and behold that it wishes to be first of all and for long centuries only a law of sorrowful sanctification. We expected it in its radiance as the heavenly kingdom in paradise, and behold that it has come to us with the traits of a pilgrim and crucified kingdom."
- Journet, Church of the Word Incarnate, vol. 4, p. 979
Important here to note: this took place during a Mass attended by students from the original Chesterton Academy.
The Sacred Liturgy is essential to a Catholic school. How beautiful it is that these students witnessed the devotion of a priest who truly loves our Eucharistic Lord.
Welcome to America, where the juror who votes to convict a woman of child murder is more severely criticized than than the mother who commits the crime.
EXCLUSIVE: The holdout juror in the Lindsay Clancy trial had a history of domestic violence allegations, the @NBC10Boston Investigators have learned through court documents and interviews with family members.
Watch at 4p, 5p, and 6p and on our digital platforms.
nbcboston.com
Here are the facts: 5 of 268 active U.S. Catholic bishops are black— about 1.9%. Only between 2 and 5% of U.S. Catholics are black (depending if you count the full diaspora). The ratio isn’t too far off.
Moreover, the Catholic laity aren’t in charge of choosing bishops! So he’s essentially accusing his brother bishops, the nuncio, and maybe even the pope (!) of “racism.” That’s extremely irresponsible.
I think the vast majority of practicing Catholics care less about what race their bishop is, and more about how Catholic they truly are.
Why are there so few Black bishops in America?
“The short answer is racism.”
America’s youngest bishop, Robert Boxie (@WashArchdiocese), speaks candidly about a Confederate flag in seminary, tokenism, DEI, what white Catholics often miss ... and why the Church cannot be afraid of hard conversations about race.
Full episode in reply.
Unpopular opinion, but the ubiquity of dogs everywhere in our society—restaurants, schools, stores, and airplanes—is a sign of a decaying society.
I don’t care about your “fur baby.”
We need to bring back excluding pets from most social situations, and telling these people “no.”
For those keeping score at home:
You can be an Austrian Catholic theologian and argue for women’s ordination, contraception, and same-sex “blessings”
—but if you criticize liberalism, you lose your teaching position.
I’m not even an integralist, but this is absurd.
This quoted post is unavailable.
In some ways, “travel” has become an idol for our age.
While I think it’s good to visit and learn about other cultures, many Millennials/Gen Z have turned it into a personality trait, when in reality, all of their “travel” is simply a manifestation of consumeristic narcissism.
modern travel is increasingly flying 10 hours to experience a slightly different version of the same globally optimized lifestyle.
same third wave coffee. same natural wine bar. same brutalist menu. same sourdough. same beige hotel. same tasteful ceramics. same instagram lighting.
what a ridiculous convergence.




















