Recently, we shipped a new version of @cancore_io and introduced a broader way of describing what we are building: the Liquidity OS for Tokenized Finance. When we started Cancore, we described it as a settlement layer. That was accurate at the time because settlement was the first major problem we had to solve: enabling value to move safely and atomically between networks that were never designed to operate together. As the product developed and people began using it, our understanding of the problem became broader. Users were less interested in how settlement worked underneath and more interested in what they could actually do with their assets: where they could hold them, how they could trade or deploy them, whether they could remain in control of them, and how much of that process could eventually happen automatically. That was an important realization for us. We had been using our hardest engineering problem to describe the entire product, when in reality settlement was becoming the infrastructure underneath a much larger system. If it works properly, users should not have to think about it. That is how Cancore has evolved into what we now call the Liquidity OS for Tokenized Finance. Trade and Wallet are already live, with Strategies, Autopilot and more automated execution being built on top of the same settlement infrastructure. The goal is to give users one environment for accessing, moving and managing liquidity rather than a collection of disconnected tools. @CantonNetwork remains at the center of that architecture as our institutional foundation, while public chains provide access to broader onchain liquidity, users and markets. These environments are growing quickly, but they still operate largely as separate financial systems. Cancore is being built around the opportunity to make them work together more naturally. Tokenizing an asset solves issuance. Making that asset liquid, accessible and programmable is the next problem. That is where we see Cancore going: more networks, more asset classes and increasingly automated execution, while keeping the complexity underneath the product rather than in front of the user. The underlying technology has not changed with this release. What changed is that the product has developed far enough for us to describe more clearly what we have actually been building.