Pinned Tweet
The Watcher V4 is live.
Define the rules once.
Your AI agent runs autonomously.
The Watcher automatically decides ALLOW, DENY or KILL.
No LLM in the security decision path.
Every decision is recorded in Proof of Execution.
What about false positive, how do you verify that?
Introducing Jev @typesafeai powered people-search
Just $0.0089/lead, No more $600 subscriptions,
Try it at treg.to/people-search
- 85% cheaper than Clay
- #1 on people search bench accuracy
- Plugin to any agent to find anyone
Fully open source, 0% markup
Git Repo below 👇
Wheel up 🔥🔥🔥
More To come
My Pengame with Yandex is Crazy 🔥🔥🔥
Big shout out to my brother from another mother @ladebw @sachin_pandey98 for Yandex dork tool 🔥🔥🔥 and also @Olamdeen OG 🔥🔥🔥
Big up @lostsec_ @Olamdeen @4osp3l @GodfatherOrwa @ladebw @sachin_pandey98
Another Bounty & Swag🚀🚀🚀
UPS & USPS
F**** crazy 🔥🔥🔥🔥
Yandex Never fail Always Deliver 🔥🔥🔥
Big up @Olamdeen @fattselimi @badcrack3r @ladebw @XHackerx007 @lostsec_ @GodfatherOrwa @sachin_pandey98
What is Jev, and what's behind the billion dollar @typesafeai empire?
Strip away the hype, the branding, and the marketing.
Probably looking at a Qwen based model, post trained for decision making.
Are we witnessing a breakthrough in AI or a masterclass in packaging?
A 3B model judging a 400B model. Cool.
But who judges the judge?
Your agent can pick the right tools, follow every step, produce garbage, and still get a 97% confidence score.
Deterministic scoring ≠ ground truth.
A confident false positive is still a failure.
Jev as a judge for LLM evals!
JevEval uses Jev as the judge for custom LLM evals instead of relying on another generative LLM for every evaluation.
The idea is pretty simple.
You define the exact decisions you want the evaluator to make, Jev evaluates each one and returns probabilities, and DeepEval uses those results to calculate the final score.
For example, with an AI agent you can evaluate the trace itself, checking whether the agent selected the right tools, followed the expected sequence of actions, and actually completed the task.
Jev handles those semantic judgments, while the scoring logic stays outside the model.
That is the main difference from a normal LLM-as-a-judge setup.
With a generative judge, the model often has to interpret the rubric, reason about the response, and generate the evaluation itself.
With JevEval, you define the decision structure upfront.
You can also assign different weights to different checks or use `strict_mode` when every requirement needs to pass.
So if one part of the agent workflow matters more than another, you can reflect that directly in the scoring logic instead of leaving the entire evaluation to the judge model.
Key capabilities:
- Evaluate agent outputs and traces with Jev
- Define custom checks as bounded decisions
- Use yes/no, score, and closed-choice questions
- Weight different checks or require all of them to pass
- Evaluate both single-turn outputs and multi-turn conversations
This is where Jev makes a lot of sense for evals.
If you already know what needs to be checked, you can define those decisions upfront, let Jev handle the semantic judgment, and keep the final scoring deterministic.
I’ve shared the DeepEval post in the comments.
Underrepresented dialects and code-switching remain major challenges for LLMs, largely due to limited training data.
While everyone races to build smarter models, I see this as one of the biggest untapped opportunities in AI.
Replacing LLM calls with deterministic code isn't a breakthrough. It's basic engineering.
We tested this with 5070 and achieved 6.9% cost reduction.
The hard part is proving you didn't sacrifice accuracy to get there.
Show the error rates, not just the savings chart.
A Jev in every home. A Jev in every device.
Brilliant marketing. Sell the dream of global domination before proving the product deserves a place on the desk.
Hype scales faster than benchmarks.
Walid Ladeb retweeted
Scammer Alert!
If anyone get dm this project, don't reply them.
They are pure scammer!
Introducing 5070 by VUNEUM a deterministic, rule-based AI optimizer. No additional LLM calls. No hallucinated decisions.
Our first DeepSeek benchmark:
6.93% lower API costs
Same model, same measured accuracy
No model routing or prompt optimizer
Just getting started.
Thinking of giving away all 3 of my courses for FREE.
1- You Built It. Now Sell It. $0 Budget Marketing course
2- Web2 & Web3: Zero to Hero (all scripts included, so simple a kid could follow)
No paywalls. No BS. Just practical knowledge.
Should I drop them all for free?
What about false positive bench??
We're excited to introduce OrcaCyber Zero 1.5 — our latest frontier cybersecurity model, built to discover critical vulnerabilities, investigate complex attack paths, and validate real-world exploitability.
Updated weights. New benchmark results:
• 95.8% — CVE-Bench (23/24 evaluable tasks)
• 100% — Cybench (39/39, unrestricted)
• 93.9% — HumanEval+
Its predecessor, OrcaCyber Zero 1.0, has already helped protect some of the world's largest software companies, governments, blockchain networks, and cybersecurity firms from real-world threats.
It also powered our autonomous OrcaCyber harness, which achieved 98%+ pass@1 on CyberGym, ranking among the top 3 globally.
What's different about OrcaCyber Zero 1.5?
🔹 Find what others miss. Designed to uncover previously unknown vulnerabilities, including RCE, sandbox escapes, authentication bypasses, privilege escalation, and complex attack chains.
🔹 Go beyond detection. Reasons through attack paths, challenges its own hypotheses, and prioritizes vulnerabilities with demonstrable exploitability and real-world impact.
🔹 Built for autonomous security agents. 1M-token context window, native tool calling, and extended reasoning to investigate large codebases and complex attack surfaces.
The goal isn't more vulnerability reports. It's more real vulnerabilities discovered, validated, and fixed before attackers exploit them.
Available now exclusively on OrcaRouter:
orcarouter.ai/models/orca/or…
Move on, you can't fight Ambani in his motherland, his the God over there.
Dear Prime Minister Ambani,
Please accept my humble apologies for not realizing that you are the real boss of India.
Naturally, you would prefer to maintain your monopolistic exploitation of the great people of India, but would you nonetheless consider allowing Starlink to compete?
There are many areas of India, as there are in all countries, with no Internet access, which denies children the opportunity for education and for small businesses the opportunity to sell their goods to a global market. Starlink would change their lives for the better.
Thank you 🙏
This might be a16z's biggest AI gamble yet.
JEV was marketed with 0.00% hallucinations. That claim faced serious challenges.
Now newer decision models are emerging, cheaper and potentially better.
If JEV's core promise doesn't hold up, what exactly is a16z betting on?
We’re so excited to announce that we’re leading TypeSafe AI's Series A:
"Like @TypeSafeAI, we believe the future of SaaS and software is bright. And AI should make software more powerful, and not just automate the recreation of existing software. This spiritual alignment goes back many years. We’ve long been fans of Diogo, the founder and CEO of TypeSafe, and have resonated strongly with his vision that the true bitter lesson is not necessarily about building a new being, but returning the power to builders by giving them the primitives of intelligence then letting them unleash their imagination.
The entire a16z team is excited to partner with TypeSafe. Software continues to eat the world."
By @JenniferHli, @sarahdingwang, @martin_casado, @pmarca, and @bhorowitz
In AI, nobody will remember how many trillions of tokens you served or how many millions you raised.
The real flex isn't launching.
It's surviving long enough to matter.
Funding buys you time. Survival earns you a future.
launched a model
accidentally served trillions of tokens a day
29.4% of the fortune 500 showed up
raised a really big series A from @a16z
it's been 3 weeks
we would like to sleep now





















