Business/tech entrepreneur who believes deeply in the importance of more people learning about history and economics.
Near Boston
Joined October 2008
- Tweets4.1K
- Following356
- Followers512
- Likes21.5K
Lee Wright retweeted
This is a great illustration that a State is simply the holder of a monopoly on violence. If there is no monopoly holder, there is no State. The UN refused to assert a monopoly, so they were just another gang. The notion of human rights and due process comes after a State is established.
Lee Wright retweeted
The question to ask socialists is:
Would you still support feeding, housing, educating, and providing healthcare to everyone if doing so required slavery?
They'll say no, of course.
Then ask: If people refuse to provide these things voluntarily, do you abandon your promises or force them to comply?
At what point does someone else's need justify your use of force on someone else?
Lee Wright retweeted
Top 20 des sorties les plus abjectes de l'intelligentsia de gauche française. Ceux qui nous ont fait la morale pendant cinquante ans.
Aragon, 1931. Il écrit un poème à la gloire de la Guépéou, la police politique de Staline. La machine qui remplira le Goulag.
Sartre, 1954, de retour d'URSS : « La liberté de critique est totale en URSS. » Pendant que les camps tournent à plein régime.
Sartre, 1961 : « Tout anticommuniste est un chien. » Le ton du débat intellectuel français pour trente ans.
Simone de Beauvoir, 1957, La Longue Marche. Un portrait enchanté de la Chine de Mao, juste avant le Grand Bond en avant et ses dizaines de millions de morts de faim.
Paul Éluard, 1950. André Breton lui demande d'intervenir pour leur ami Záviš Kalandra, condamné à mort dans un procès stalinien à Prague. Éluard refuse publiquement. Kalandra est pendu.
Philippe Sollers et la revue Tel Quel, 1974. Voyage en Chine en pleine Révolution culturelle, retour en extase maoïste.
Sartre, préface des Damnés de la terre, 1961. Abattre un Européen, explique-t-il, c'est faire d'une pierre deux coups : un oppresseur et un opprimé disparaissent, il reste un homme mort et un homme libre.
Sartre, 1972, après la prise d'otages des JO de Munich et le massacre des athlètes israéliens : le terrorisme serait la seule arme des opprimés.
Sartre, 1974, rend visite à Andreas Baader en prison. Jean Genet, en 1977, publie dans Le Monde un texte de soutien à la Fraction Armée rouge.
Sartre, 1973, interview à Actuel : un régime révolutionnaire doit se débarrasser de ceux qui le menacent, et il ne voit pas d'autre moyen que la mort.
Alain Badiou, Le Monde, janvier 1979 : « Kampuchéa vaincra ! » Un texte de soutien aux Khmers rouges, qui viennent d'exterminer près d'un quart de la population cambodgienne.
Michel Foucault, 1978. Il part en Iran et s'enthousiasme dans la presse italienne pour la « spiritualité politique » de la révolution de Khomeini.
René Schérer, L'Émile perverti, 1974. Un philosophe de Paris VIII théorise la « libération » sexuelle de l'enfant contre l'éducation.
Schérer et Guy Hocquenghem, Co-ire, 1976. Une revue entière consacrée à l'enfant « désirant ». Publiée, diffusée, discutée comme de la pensée sérieuse.
Gabriel Matzneff, Les Moins de seize ans, 1974. Publié par un grand éditeur, chroniqué, célébré. En 1990 chez Pivot, il raconte, le plateau rit. Seule Denise Bombardier ose se lever.
Daniel Cohn-Bendit, Le Grand Bazar, 1975, puis à Apostrophes en 1982. Il décrit des jeux sexuels avec des enfants de crèche. Il dira plus tard que c'était de la provocation et que rien n'a eu lieu. Personne sur le plateau ne bronche.
Foucault, 1978, sur France Culture, dans un débat intitulé « La loi de la pudeur ». Il plaide contre la majorité sexuelle et refuse de présumer qu'un enfant ne peut pas consentir.
Mai 1977. Lettre ouverte à la commission de révision du Code pénal pour abroger les lois sur les relations sexuelles avec les moins de 15 ans. Signée notamment par Foucault, Deleuze, Barthes, Derrida, Althusser.
Janvier 1977. Le Monde, puis Libération, publient une tribune pour défendre trois hommes poursuivis pour relations sexuelles avec des mineurs de moins de 15 ans. Une soixantaine de signatures du gratin intellectuel de l'époque. Jack Lang, des décennies plus tard : « C'était une connerie. »
Libération, le journal cofondé par Sartre. Il ouvre ses colonnes aux militants pédophiles, publie des petites annonces d'adultes cherchant des enfants, et en 1979 une pétition pour défendre un homme arrêté pour des relations avec des fillettes de 6 à 12 ans.
Ces gens ont dirigé la vie intellectuelle française. Ils ont formé nos profs, écrit nos manuels, tenu nos rédactions. Et ils nous ont expliqué pendant cinquante ans où était le bien.
On vit dans un monde où presque toutes les valeurs ont été retournées. Ce n'est pas un accident. C'est le résultat d'un projet intellectuel précis, porté par une génération précise, avec des obsessions très particulières.
Pendant cinquante ans, une poignée d'intellectuels de gauche a façonné la France. L'école, l'université, les rédactions, l'édition, le cinéma, une partie de la magistrature. Tout est passé entre leurs mains. Ils ont formé les profs qui ont formé nos profs. Ils ont écrit les livres qu'on nous a fait lire. Ils ont décidé de ce qui était respectable et de ce qui ne l'était pas.
Et qu'y avait-il sous la surface ?
D'abord le communisme. Sartre qui revient de Moscou en expliquant que la liberté de critique y est totale. Des normaliens qui encensent Mao pendant que des millions de Chinois meurent. Une intelligentsia entière qui préfère avoir tort avec Sartre que raison avec Aron.
Ensuite, le projet de tout déconstruire. La famille, la nation, l'autorité, la transmission, la norme, la vérité elle-même. Tout devait être soupçonné, tout devait être renversé, puisque tout n'était que domination.
Et puis il y a ce que personne n'aime rappeler. En 1977, Le Monde et Libération publient une tribune pour défendre des hommes poursuivis pour des relations sexuelles avec des enfants de moins de 15 ans, signée par une partie du gratin intellectuel de l'époque. En 1979, Libération publie une nouvelle pétition pour défendre un homme arrêté pour des relations avec des fillettes de 6 à 12 ans. On parlait de « libérer » la sexualité des enfants. On invitait à la télévision des écrivains qui racontaient leurs actes dans leurs livres. Et on applaudissait.
Ce n'était pas une marge. C'était le centre. C'était le camp du bien.
Voilà le sous-jacent sur lequel on a construit l'Occident moderne. Une matrice qui a appris à des générations entières à mépriser ce qu'elles avaient reçu, à se haïr elles-mêmes, et à confondre la transgression avec le progrès.
Aujourd'hui, on vit encore sous cette coupe. Mais ça craque. Ça craque partout. Parce qu'une civilisation ne peut pas tenir indéfiniment sur une idéologie qui nie le réel. Les fondations ne tiennent plus, et tout le monde le sent, même ceux qui refusent encore de le dire.
Dans quelques décennies, on regardera cette période comme l'une des plus honteuses de l'histoire intellectuelle française. On se demandera comment des gens qui se croyaient l'avant-garde morale de l'humanité ont pu défendre le goulag, Mao et l'indéfendable sur les enfants, tout en donnant des leçons au reste du monde.
Et on se souviendra de ceux qui avaient raison trop tôt. Camus. Aron. Ceux qui ont payé leur lucidité de leur réputation.
L'histoire finit toujours par trier. Elle est en train de le faire.
Lee Wright retweeted
In 1968, teenage Red Guards were beating their professors to death with clubs in Beijing courtyards.
Meanwhile, Jean-Paul Sartre sat in Paris calling Mao's Cultural Revolution a model of revolutionary democracy. The most celebrated intellectual in France looked at a country burning its own libraries and saw liberation. He sold the Maoist newspaper La Cause du Peuple on French street corners himself, holding it aloft like a sacrament.
Between 1966 and 1976, the Cultural Revolution killed between 500,000 and two million people. Schools shut down across the entire country. Students dragged teachers onto stages, hung placards around their necks, forced them to kneel on broken glass, then murdered them. The historian Bian Zhongyun, vice-principal of a girls' school in Beijing, died on August 5, 1966, beaten by her own students with nail-studded clubs.
Sartre swooned at this, calling it the people governing themselves. Why did a man this intelligent get it this wrong? Sartre believed knowledge served power, that truth was whatever the revolution required, that the individual existed to be dissolved into the collective will.
So when Mao abolished the distinction between teacher and student, between expert and mob, Sartre cheered. He had spent decades arguing that bourgeois reason was a class weapon. Here was a regime taking him at his word and clubbing the reasoners to death. This is what economic illiteracy gets you.
Mises had already explained the calculation problem in 1920. Hayek explained dispersed knowledge in 1945. Sartre had access to both and chose the dunce cap of the collective instead, then handed out its propaganda on the Rue de Rennes.
He died in 1980, mourned by 50,000 followers, never having retracted a word about Mao. The professors of Beijing got no such funeral, only a philosopher in Paris explaining that their murder was freedom.
Lee Wright retweeted
Two years ago, 72% of you voted to let the State Auditor audit the Legislature. Beacon Hill has spent most of the time since fighting it.
This week, roughly 85% of you voted to put the Governor’s office and the Legislature under the same public records law that already applies to cities, towns, and state agencies.
That’s not a close call. That’s a mandate.
The question is simple: Will they honor it, or will we get the same result as the audit, resistance, delay, and a narrower rewrite that protects the status quo?
Gov. Healey has said she’ll comply and would veto an attempt to undercut it. Legislative leaders say there are still “details to be worked out,” while their own narrower version sits in conference.
We’ll see who means it.
Massachusetts has now spoken twice, loudly, for more transparency. Will anyone be surprised if Beacon Hill blocks it?
Lee Wright retweeted
What unites the Left and Islam as civilizations opposed to the West.
On the surface, almost nothing. One is atheist, the other theocratic. One preaches the liberation of the senses, the other their discipline. And yet they march together through Western capitals – the French even have a word for the alliance: islamo-gauchisme.
The obvious answer is that both define themselves against the West, and both have conquest in their history and in their doctrine: world revolution for one, the expansion of Islam for the other. Using conquest and the Lie – through all available means.
But beyond the envy, there is something deeper: the relation to reality.
The West rests on two convictions: the world is knowable, and the individual can act upon it. That the world was made by reason, and reason can read it. That is why science was born here.
Islam answered otherwise. One of its most influential theologians, al-Ghazali, taught that fire does not burn cotton: God burns it, directly, every time. If the world has no laws of its own, there is nothing for reason to discover – only a will to obey.
The Left arrived at the same place by another road. Marx put it plainly, teaching that it is not man's consciousness that determines his being, but his social being that determines his consciousness. You are your class – today, your race and your sex. History decides, the Party interprets, and two plus two is whatever the Party says. If History decides, there is no truth to discover – only a line to follow.
In both, the individual is not a cause. Things happen to him – by the will of God, or by the laws of History. And both ask the same thing of him: submission.
Two Civilizations of Submission. To God or to the State.
The West made man a cause. Sophocles sang that of all the wonders, none is more wonderful than man. The Bible made him in the image of God and gave him the task of naming the creatures. The Renaissance called him the free shaper of himself, and Michelangelo painted the finger of God and the finger of Adam almost touching. That is what the West is: the Civilization of the celebration of the Greatness, the Grandeur, the Magnificence of the individual human being, with his ability to act, know and shape the World around him.
Envy wants what we have. Submission cannot forgive what we are.
—
Poland stopped both at the gates of Europe – the Ottomans at Vienna in 1683, the Bolsheviks at Warsaw in 1920. Both times, the outcome seemed already decided, and free men chose to act. After Vienna, Sobieski wrote to the Pope: "We came, we saw, God conquered." Not submission – cooperation and Human Action. The finger of God and the finger of man, almost touching.
There is a term America will have to learn now, one the French know very well by now – islamo-leftism, or islamo-communism if you prefer.
Basically the alliance of forces set to destroy Western Civilization. That is pretty much their unique unifying point.
The alliance is older than the word. In 1979, Iran's left marched with Khomeini. A few years later he was jailing and executing them.
In France it works like this. The left lost the worker, so it went looking for a new people. It found the Muslims.
France already knows the consequences. Now it's America's turn to learn them.
The leftist is always the last to learn. In Tehran, it was the last thing he learned.
Lee Wright retweeted
Every Republican legislature in America should immediately pass legislation to:
1) Ban sanctuary cities
2) Ban Ranked Choice Voting
3) Ban ballot harvesting
4) Require citizenship to vote
5) Require photo ID to vote
6) Ban the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact
7) Ban foreign entities from buying property
8) Suspend any gas taxes
9) Institute school choice
10) Abolish property taxes
11) Open non-juror records to public inspection
12) Mandate secretaries of state to share complete voter registration rolls with DOJ
13) Mandate voter roll list maintenance
14) Offer rewards for convictions involving fraudulent use of Medicare, Medicaid, SNAP, Social Security, or other entitlements
15) Freeze rent increases
Republican governors would be wise to use this time to convene special sessions.
Lee Wright retweeted
Thinking about my friend and our @SaveEuropeAct co-founder @MartinSellner_ who is currently being kept in a cell tonight at the airport in Paris before they’ll deport him back to Austria tomorrow.
He did nothing wrong. Broke no law. This is purely because of who he is and what he stands for.
And mind you, he’s an Austrian citizen who travelled within the Schengen zone, meaning there shouldn’t even be border checks.
This is all premeditated. They knew he was flying into Paris this morning. They knew they wouldn’t let him in, but they let take the flight anyway to then stop him at the border and have him spend the night in a prison cell.
It’s all one big humiliation ritual. This is how they treat White patriots in Europe who are a little too successful at spreading the truth.
Lee Wright retweeted
Thanks for the great free publicity for @RestoreBritain and the @SaveEuropeAct, dear @Telegraph.
Xoxo
Europe’s most ✨EXTREME✨ activists
Just how close is Restore Britain to some of Europe’s most extreme activists?
Rupert Lowe's party wants to deport millions of people from the UK, but they are far from the only ones in Europe calling for “remigration”.
@JamesCrisp6 looks at Restore’s links to Europe’s far-Right ⤵️
telegraph.co.uk/world-news/2…
Lee Wright retweeted
In January the UK revoked my ETA days after I criticised Keir Starmer, declaring me “not conducive to the public good.”
I’ve now been invited by MP @RupertLowe10 to come speak at a @RestoreBritain and the Home Office is stalling my visa application, effectively denying me entry again.
France just banned our @SaveEuropeAct cofounder @MartinSellner_ indefinitely as a “genuine, present and sufficiently serious threat” to public order. Same thing: no conviction, no trial.
This is a dangerous trend of two-tier enforcement: restricting the movement of law-abiding European patriots who criticize mass migration, while third-world migrants enter, claim benefits, and even gain citizenship.
The British public deserves to know about it, and the only politician prepared to do something about it is Rupert Lowe.
Lee Wright retweeted
Thank you, @RupertLowe10, for raising awareness of this outrageous two-tier system.
The British public deserves to know exactly who this government is letting in and who it’s keeping out.
Let’s see if the @ukhomeoffice will grow a pair and care to comment.
I invited @EvaVlaar to Britain to attend a Restore Britain event - the Home Office has not allowed that to happen. My thoughts on a dark day for free speech in our country...
Lee Wright retweeted
Day 2 of “The Pursuit of History: The British Empire Strikes Back,” starting with author Friederike Baer on “Hessians in America” in @TheOldBarracks. Headed later to @NJStateMuseum and on to Washington Crossing on the NJ side, Princeton, and more.
Lee Wright retweeted
The men who wrote the Constitution owned guns, distrusted bankers, and believed taxation without consent was worth dying over. They would not recognize the country operating under their name today.
Federal spending crossed $7 trillion per year. The income tax, which the founders explicitly rejected, now reaches into every paycheck you earn before you touch a dollar of it. The Federal Reserve, a central bank of the exact type Jefferson warned would strip citizens of property through inflation, has spent the last two decades aggressively expanding the money supply and handing you the bill through rising prices.
The founders drew the federal government's powers in a short, specific list. Congress could coin money, raise an army, and regulate interstate trade. What it could not do is not in that list, because the founders assumed the limits were obvious. They were wrong to assume that.
Today the federal government licenses your profession, subsidizes your competitor, dictates your health plan, and surveils your financial transactions above $600. The administrative state, staffed by unelected bureaucrats at the FDA, SEC, EPA, and an estimated 430 other agencies, writes rules carrying the force of law without a single congressional vote. Madison called this precise arrangement tyranny in The Federalist Papers(No. 47).
The founders risked hanging to escape a government that taxed tea at 3%. You hand over 30 percent of your income and are supposed to thank the state for the privilege of keeping the rest.
Lee Wright retweeted
🎥"Will you comply with the public records law or work to overturn it?"🎤
That's the question we asked Senate President Karen Spilka and her colleagues at a State House Event. With 86% voting YES on Question 1 you'd think they'd honor the will of the voters.
But before Question 1 can even take effect, lawmakers already have legislation sitting in conference committee that could weaken what voters just approved. Essentially, overturning the election results.
Even before voters passed this question, lawmakers set to work trying to undermine it by passing their own versions of the law. H.5469 and S.3244 would create a completely new and separate public records system for the Legislature. Rather than simply subjecting the Legislature to the existing Public Records Law, we see the House and Senate bills limit disclosure to a defined list of “legislative records” and establish a separate process for challenging records that lawmakers refuse to release.
That distinction matters. Question 1 was intended to bring the Legislature under the same Public Records Law that already applies across much of state and local government. Creating a separate system for lawmakers risks preserving special treatment for Beacon Hill and limiting the transparency voters mandated on election day.
That is not what voters just approved.
Voters were asked a straightforward question: Should most records held by the Legislature and Governor’s Office be subject to the Massachusetts Public Records Law?
They said yes.
The Legislature should not use a lame duck session to substitute its own narrower version of the law voters just approved. Nor should lawmakers use a conference committee to accomplish something that voters rejected at the ballot box.
This is bigger than a disagreement over legislative procedure. It is about whether elected officials will respect a clear decision made directly by Massachusetts voters. Its about a legislature that overturns the election results.
Beacon Hill should not now rewrite that decision.
Lee Wright retweeted
🚨 Thierry, the only "technical difficulty" Elon ever had was spending years fighting people like you instead of building. 🚨
You're advising him to stay out of politics. But ask yourself the real question: why would a man who builds rockets, electric cars and satellites ever need to get into politics in the first place?
Because it was never a choice. Elon voted Democrat for years. He spent two decades avoiding politics so he could build. He didn't walk into politics. He was dragged into it.
What he discovered when he bought Twitter is that the institutions that manufacture consensus, universities, media, bureaucracies, NGOs, trust and safety teams, had been captured by a single ideological family: the left. Not influenced. Captured. The Twitter Files documented it in black and white: banned accounts, suppressed topics, government agencies sending lists of content to take down.
When you see that from the inside, you understand one thing: the West isn't sliding into totalitarianism through tanks. It's sliding into it through content moderation. And that slide had a European face. Yours. The commissioner who sent X a threatening letter hours before an interview with a US presidential candidate. The man who explained on television that "we did it in Romania" and would do it again in Germany if necessary.
Elon didn't enter politics out of a hunger for power. He entered because free speech is the precondition for everything else, and people like you were dismantling it.
And unlike you, he understands economics. He read Hayek. He understood what Hayek understood in 1944: no planner, no committee, no commission holds the knowledge scattered across millions of minds. The more you centralize decisions, the more you destroy collective intelligence. The road to serfdom doesn't start with camps. It starts with regulations.
That's exactly what Europe has become: advanced collectivism that refuses to say its name. Directives nobody voted for, written by officials nobody can fire. We regulated AI before we built any. We regulated tech without having a single tech giant. In 2008, the European economy was bigger than America's. Today it's far behind. That's not an accident. It's the direct result of your system.
And this system isn't dying alone. It found allies: a cynical left of millionaires preaching virtue from their nice neighborhoods, and the Islamist entryism of the Muslim Brotherhood, which the French state itself documented in an official report. A bureaucracy that forbids naming the problems, allied with those who exploit them: in the end, that cocktail is lethal for Western civilization.
Thierry, you live in a parallel reality. A reality built on lies: that censoring is protecting. That regulating is innovating. That Europe is doing fine. You've repeated them so many times you've started to believe them. But reality doesn't negotiate. A lie you end up mistaking for the truth always comes back to hit you in the face.
Yours is already on its way.
Lee Wright retweeted
“The Pursuit of History: The British Empire Strikes Back” is underway, with military historian Rick Herrera at the @TheOldBarracks. We always meet in a historic site and are very appreciative of Michelle and her staff at the Old Barracks welcoming us into this building, which has recently undergone extensive renovation. The Old Barracks was part of the Battle of Trenton, so it played a role in what we are exploring today and tomorrow, and people have come from across the country for this unique program, part of our series that continues through 2033, The Pursuit of History for America’s 250th.
Lee Wright retweeted
A man living under a forged identity stepped off an evening commuter bus in a dusty Buenos Aires suburb, carrying a bouquet of flowers for his wife, only for Israeli undercover agents to tackle him into a ditch, smuggle him past airport customs disguised in a flight attendant uniform, and put the logistical architect of the Holocaust inside a bulletproof glass booth in Jerusalem.
The reason might surprise you.
For fifteen years after World War II, SS-Obersturmbannführer Adolf Eichmann, the head of Gestapo Department IV B4 who organized the railway timetables, deportation trains, and logistical extermination of six million European Jews, evaded justice:
Using Nazi underground ratlines arranged by sympathetic clergy in Italy, Eichmann acquired a Red Cross passport under the alias Ricardo Klement and slipped across the Atlantic to Argentina in 1950.
He settled on Garibaldi Street in the remote, unpaved neighborhood of San Fernando outside Buenos Aires, working as a foreman at a local Mercedes-Benz assembly plant.
He lived a quiet, unassuming working-class life, convinced that distance and the passage of time had shielded him permanently from retribution.
The breakthrough came from an unexpected domestic romance:
A half-Jewish German immigrant named Lothar Hermann, who was blinded in Dachau and lived in Argentina, noticed his teenage daughter, Sylvia, had begun dating a young man named Klaus who openly boasted about his father's prominent Nazi past.
Recognizing the name, Hermann alerted Fritz Bauer, the fiercely dedicated German-Jewish state prosecutor in Hesse.
Distrusting former Nazi sympathizers embedded in the post-war West German judicial system, Bauer bypassed his own government and secretly passed the intelligence directly to the Mossad in Tel Aviv.
Israeli Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion ordered Mossad chief Isser Harel to launch Operation Garibaldi:
Operatives confirmed Klement's identity on March 21, 1960, when surveillance photographed him arriving home with a bouquet of flowers, coinciding exactly with the 25th silver wedding anniversary of Adolf and Vera Eichmann.
On the drizzling night of May 11, 1960, Eichmann stepped off the 203 bus at his usual stop around 8:05 PM.
As he walked down the dark roadside, Mossad operative Peter Malkin lunged from the shadows, whispering in Spanish: "Un momentito, señor", before tackling Eichmann to the ground and shoving him into the back of a waiting car.
He was held for nine days in a secure safe house, subjected to intense interrogation until he signed a voluntary statement admitting his real identity.
Smuggling him out of sovereign Argentine territory without triggering a diplomatic crisis required calculated deception:
An official El Al Bristol Britannia aircraft had flown an Israeli diplomatic delegation to Argentina for the country's 150th independence anniversary celebrations.
On the night of May 20, 1960, an Israeli doctor sedated Eichmann with an injection to induce semi-consciousness.
Operatives dressed Eichmann in an El Al crew uniform, forged a medical transfer certificate claiming he was an injured flight navigator recovering from an onboard concussion, and walked him past Argentine airport immigration and police checkpoints arm-in-arm.
The aircraft took off for Tel Aviv, landing safely on Israeli soil.
On May 23, 1960, Prime Minister Ben-Gurion shocked the Knesset and the world by announcing that Eichmann was in Israeli custody and would stand public trial.
The 1961 Jerusalem trial became a global watershed:
Broadcast across international networks, over 100 Holocaust survivors took the stand to recount the horrors of the death camps on global television.
Eichmann, seated inside a custom bulletproof glass booth for his protection, maintained a cold, bureaucrat defense: claiming he was merely a "cog in a machine" who followed legal orders, inspiring political philosopher Hannah Arendt's famous phrase, the "banality of evil."
On December 15, 1961, Eichmann was convicted on fifteen counts of crimes against the Jewish people, crimes against humanity, and war crimes.
He was executed by hanging just before midnight on May 31, 1962, the only civil judicial execution ever carried out by the state of Israel. His body was cremated, and his ashes were scattered by an Israeli naval vessel into the Mediterranean Sea beyond Israel's territorial waters, ensuring no nation would ever house a grave or memorial to his name.
Great group tonight and a great two and a half days to come at Washington Crossing, Trenton, Princeton, and more.
